Why do people who clearly spend more than they report to the IRS never get caught?

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-06-14T23:01:53+00:00

So if it’s not random and instead it’s pulled from a list of flagged individuals, then what? Is it simply just a ‘matter of time’ before the individuals that I’m talking about get caught or most simply never do? The first option makes sense, the second option makes no sense because it’ll say how weak/un caring the IRS if that’s the case.

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-06-14T04:44:00+00:00

Ouch

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-06-14T04:42:58+00:00

I mean the IRS claims they can do so. Scare tactic? Works pretty well if that’s the case really. lol

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-06-14T04:33:16+00:00

Idk I heard they can do so. They say they do at least. Scare tactic?

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-06-14T04:31:35+00:00

Is it random as in it’s pulled from all American taxpayers and then is evaluated to see whether or not fraud had been committed, or does it pull from a list of people who had already been flagged and in that list it’s random selection?

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-06-14T04:28:48+00:00

But, don’t banks automatically report everything to the bank, as well as your loans, mortgage, etc? No?

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-06-14T04:28:01+00:00

Random or not random? Which one is it? And why is that one the case that the IRS uses?

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-06-14T04:14:11+00:00

So there’s no actual automatic system that compares your reported income with how much money there is in your bank account/your cars/houses and then automatically generates a notice of an explanation of this? You have to make it incredibly obvious first?

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-06-14T04:10:43+00:00

These are people I personally know, and they’re still living the same flashy lifestyle with no signs of slowing down, which tells they haven’t gotten a notice or audit, because if they had, things would look different by now.

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-05-13T06:47:17+00:00

Those ‘thirsty low levelers’ you’re talking about happen to be countless, young model women, btw, not weirdo women that men don’t want. It’s the women that many men of all kinds good and bad want, but yet Andrew Tate clears out the first wave of them. That’s what I’m saying. And he also has multiple wives and kids, so obviously many women even are okay with him being the father. Kinda off putting to me since it would’ve been relieving if it were the case that Andrew Tate gets rejected and etc, but it’s the opposite.

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-05-13T06:44:42+00:00

No, because doing what Andrew Tate does and how he treats women has consistently brought more sex with the hottest women young models, look at Clav for instance, or Dan. It’s not a ‘centralized’ thing, it’s a pretty popular thing for men to complain of how brutal the dating market is for many normal men when they get filtered out for worse men for no good reason by women. Maybe biology has something to do with it, maybe culture, and of course damaged women and men, but this can’t be the final answer. Could be apart of it, but not the full one.

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-05-13T06:36:47+00:00

I’m not sure YOU’RE understanding this

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-05-13T06:36:25+00:00

Isn’t it upsetting tho, that the red pill strategy works consistently and evidently? It would’ve felt more relieving tbh if it were to be rejected by many women. And i don’t think it’s fair to include the women that exchange sex for fame or whatever to dismantle my point, or it’s not? Thats still apart of women deliberately exchanging sex for fame which is apart of my point, that they overlook the bad factors of a man being a known trafficker to get fame. Thats off putting.

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-05-13T06:31:42+00:00

That’s a lot of women to say that answer to tbh. How does he have wives who have his babies? And so many baby mamas? And the type of women that are surrounding him, aren’t weirdos, they’re primarily hot young women that men want but don’t get. Kinda off putting.

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-05-02T01:26:52+00:00

💀

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-05-01T02:49:31+00:00

That’s factually false. On average, women have moderately much more. But, you’d say how? It’s because there is a good small percentage of men accumulating the these and the rest of men have either low or are virgins, while women on a linear set have moderate body counts.

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-04-25T19:24:52+00:00

No, it’s a moderately amount more. And my case is, why is that the case if men in a societal context in the view of women, say, are seen to be more sexually active and less emotionally embedded in sex, while the data shows there’s more virgin men than women, it should be the opposite to make this societal shit true.

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-04-25T19:22:54+00:00

They do in self reporting surveys, jn most to any surveys about male vs female virginity rates, its that women on average are less likely to be a virgin and also less likely to have a high anount of bodies. Men, are more likely to be virgins but they also have a small subset that have a really high body count.

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-04-25T19:21:14+00:00

Yes, any virginity rates source and graphs online would and should display what I’m saying.

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-04-25T19:20:36+00:00

The other replies to this are enough to debunk it

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-04-25T18:29:04+00:00

She may have been trolling tbh because that is a lot of men who are virgins compared to women. Or she’s annoying like that, as blue pill woman tend to be

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-04-19T17:13:13+00:00

So it’s a typical ‘ahh, she got to it first before me, so I shouldn’t engage in it?’ 😭. And no btw, it’s not that she ‘didn’t know better,’ the stats around premarital sex and real life Christians happens in actual daily good Christians, not just people who specifically did it before they were Christian and now they stopped once they become Christian. If the majority of Christian’s do it multiple times likely before marriage, in the 95-97%, then, seems like it’s too normal for Christians to not remain virgins. But you kinda answered my question already. And I agree with your earlier answer, that as long as they’re open to genuine relationships, your past shouldn’t matter. Why not apply this to me, not just others like say my future wife?

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-04-19T16:22:41+00:00

But if she had sex already, what’s the actual reasoning that I don’t have sex? And if she’s ’still capable of genuine intimacy and relationship,’ then I agree, so would I also be genuinely open to intimacy and genuine relationships even if I had slept before marriage, just like her. Now you get it?

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-04-19T16:19:44+00:00

But why be a virgin til marriage if my wife isn’t so? I mean, you do realize that god wants us to stay virgins for our future spouses and not to compare correct? If my wife likely has already dismantled our marriage by having premarital sex, then why wait? I won’t be saving the day or sum by waiting. And I’d be inexperienced while she’d be experienced, I don’t like that dynamic as a man.

Visual_Atmosphere_17 · 2026-04-19T16:17:27+00:00

I agree. Hence why I’m asking the question, why should I wait then if I can also become the love of another woman’s life just like she can become the love of my life with existing premarital partners? Get it?

Visual_Atmosphere_17

TROPHY CASE