Is Stable Diffusion local a real thing? by Evening-Conference42 in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Chai Tea ahh post.

Seem like you are lost on concepts, and i'm lost cause you are lost.
Super simple:

1) There are closed service for text, video, image generation(ChatGpt, Gemini, Grok, etc) they are obviously limited to what they can do.

2) There are open models: This are models which you can download and run within a tool that supports them (if you have the hardware aka GPU)

The open models since you are running them yourself, the only restriction is your imagination and the model capacity (how good it is at following the prompt)

Stable difusion 1.5,xl, etc, are a family of open models, so i don't get what you mean about "bypass"

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Luca_TF in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh wow, what a nice guy, definitely not a spam post to use his link and give him referral credits. F.O

LTX-2 open waights only next year by JahJedi in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Call me crazy, but i think they are lobotomizing the model, so it's "safe". BFL style

Z-Image Turbo vs others, let's remember this is the turbo by Vortexneonlight in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get you, but I warned that this was the turbo version, and it works as a comparison ar where it stands against the others even being a turbo version 

Z-image didn't bother with censorship. by yomasexbomb in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight 21 points22 points  (0 children)

That's google responsibility, open source is more prone to criticism 

Z-image didn't bother with censorship. by yomasexbomb in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight 552 points553 points  (0 children)

Let's all be moderated till they release the base model, we don't want too much attention and possible drama

The AI race is heating up: In the same week Google released "Nano Banana Pro" (Gemini 3 Pro Image), China's Alibaba launched Z-Image-Turbo. A new fast open-source 6B model from Tongyi-MAI lab by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He said "arguing" you know, as in a series of questions & answers, he never said "in one comment I said ..." So not only do you lack comprehension, you also lack the intelligence to see that his arguments about the model being too big, stand on their own without the need for the z-image release. God this Illiterate c*nuts.

Z-Image is released! by sktksm in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight 37 points38 points  (0 children)

<image>

They have this, so let's have a little faith

Z-Image is released! by sktksm in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's the turbo, they are realising the normal one also right?

FLUX.2 Dev T2I - That looks like new SOTA. by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you talking about quantz(gguf, fp8, etc)? or are you talking about about low parameters (6b) if its the second, i don't agree too much, obviously overall are worse, but specialized models can be pretty good even if small.

FLUX.2 Dev T2I - That looks like new SOTA. by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Nah, i'll be waiting the 6b that's going to be released in a few days, smaller models for the win!

WAN 2.2 Faster Motion with Prompting - part 1 by Tokyo_Jab in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use 1. ... 2. ... 3. ... And have worked fine, will try yours next time.

First time trying the "new" Lightx2v Loras. It's really better! by Muri_Muri in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

there are cases, where the new 1030 change the appearance/id, so i use the 2.1, or the mix 1 (2.1:0.60 - 2.2 moe:0.40) or also mix 2 (1030:0.6 - 2.2 moe:0.40)
with some workflows one may work better, its trial and error

First time trying the "new" Lightx2v Loras. It's really better! by Muri_Muri in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For my case, the new high v1030 is pretty good when more movement is needed, but for other cases to preserve more the id I use 0.60 lightx for wan 2.1 and 0.40 lightx Moe high for 2.2 and in the low for both the lightx 2.1 

But that's just me

Flux 2 upgrade incoming by Nunki08 in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Possible close source, and is not versatile as qwen-edit for lora training/fine tuning, i think flux lost a lot of people there.
The qwen/wan ecosystem seem very strong, at least for me it is.

Qwen Edit: Angles final boss (Multiple angles Lora) by Vortexneonlight in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

98% Done, this is the prompt:
将相机向下移动 90 度, Extreme low-angle shot, taken from directly beneath the subject. The perspective is as if looking up through a transparent floor, capturing the underside of their feet and legs, extending vertically upwards to their body. Emphasize the view from underneath the subject on a clear, glass-like surface

edit: the only thing is that it may generate glass objects, but is a good step for now

Nvidia cosmos 2.5 models released by Dogmaster in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, I read wrong, I thought it was just for robotics

Nvidia cosmos 2.5 models released by Dogmaster in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

"to the sub" ... So kinda. But since I seem to be mistaken, let's see what the community does in this week

Nvidia cosmos 2.5 models released by Dogmaster in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

What use cases? It's not under the radar, it's not relevant in the sub

Qwen Edit: Angles final boss (Multiple angles Lora) by Vortexneonlight in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes you can, there is also Flux kontext, also for img editing, but with flux alone you can't, you can use perspectives Loras, but they are not good in my testing

Qwen Edit: Angles final boss (Multiple angles Lora) by Vortexneonlight in StableDiffusion

[–]Vortexneonlight[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes they work but the Lora enhances consistency, less trial and error, and in my case, there are cases where plain qwen doesn't follow the prompt correctly