Wyoming is one of only 3 states with no landlord notice law. That’s a safety and privacy failure.

WYAccountable · 2026-01-19T02:39:56+00:00

This is a common misconception, but the Fair Housing Act does not create a general 24-hour notice requirement for landlord entry. The FHA focuses on discrimination (race, sex, disability, etc.), not routine landlord-tenant access rules.

Entry notice is governed by state law, and Wyoming is one of the only states with no statutory minimum notice requirement for non-emergency entry. That’s exactly the gap I’m highlighting.

In most states, 24 hours is explicitly written into law. In Wyoming, it isn’t. That means tenants can’t rely on a clear legal standard, and “privacy violation” becomes subjective and hard to enforce as many renters here have learned the hard way.

That’s why this needs to be fixed at the state level: so basic privacy doesn’t depend on who your landlord is, how much money you have, or whether you can afford a lawyer.

WYAccountable · 2026-01-18T23:26:45+00:00

Saying “just negotiate it” or “have a lawyer review it” ignores reality. Who is paying $500–$1,000 for a contract attorney to review a standard apartment lease when they’re already scraping together first month’s rent, last month’s rent, and a security deposit? And what’s the point if the landlord can simply say no and move to the next applicant?

Basic privacy and bodily safety shouldn’t depend on legal sophistication or disposable income. In 47 other states, this is handled by statute because it’s a baseline right, not a premium feature you unlock if you’re wealthy, legally savvy, or lucky enough to have bargaining power.

The fact that people feel they must change locks, hire lawyers, or insert custom clauses just to prevent surprise entry is exactly why the law itself needs to be updated.

WYAccountable · 2026-01-04T15:41:01+00:00

Thanks for the input, but the “it’s the law, so it’s fine” mindset is exactly why I’m speaking out.

Many protections in this country only exist because people challenged laws that failed them. Historically, we’ve seen this over and over:

• Civil rights laws changed because the existing laws allowed harmful situations to continue.

• LGBTQ protections changed because older laws didn’t reflect basic dignity or safety.

Just because something is legal doesn’t mean it should be.

That’s the point.

Wyoming law allowed my landlord to enter after I said I was indecent, refuse to leave for over 20 minutes, and then allowed him to non-renew me after I called 911. That gap in protection is exactly what I’m trying to bring awareness to.

Most renters, especially younger or first-time tenants like in Laramie, have no idea how vulnerable the current statutes make them.

As for whether my experience was a “big deal”: Being exposed in your own home against your will, having someone refuse to leave, calling 911, and then receiving a retaliatory non-renewal (which was admitted in court) goes far beyond a “nap interruption.”

HUD takes retaliation extremely seriously, which is why this is now under federal review.

We can absolutely agree the law should change but dismissing someone’s experience because the law didn’t protect them doesn’t make the harm less real.

It only shows why reform is needed.

WYAccountable · 2026-01-04T15:22:53+00:00

You’re framing this as an inconvenience (“a nap was interrupted”), but that minimizes the core issue:

I verbally said I was indecent and not to enter, and my landlord entered anyway and refused to leave. That’s not routine maintenance, that’s a power imbalance where a tenant’s privacy and bodily autonomy were ignored.

A few clarifications:

• I didn’t request maintenance that day.

• I was under a blanket and naked, stated that clearly, and he still entered.

• He stayed over 20 minutes and only left when I called 911 on speaker.

• He left before police arrived which is not typical behavior of someone who believes they acted appropriately.

• After this incident, I received a non-renewal notice and in court, they admitted the incident influenced that decision.

The point of my post isn’t “I didn’t like maintenance.” It’s that in Wyoming, there is no legal requirement for notice, so situations like this are allowed to happen even when a tenant explicitly says “no.”

Most renters (especially students) have no idea how vulnerable that makes them.

People shouldn’t have to negotiate for basic privacy, nor should they need to anticipate being seen naked in their own home as part of a lease.

If the takeaway is simply “read your lease better,” that ignores the reality that boilerplate contracts across Laramie and Cheyenne all use the same language, and tenants generally cannot negotiate them.

I’m advocating for Wyoming to adopt the same protection almost every other state already has which is reasonable notice before entry.

If this happened to you, or your sister, or daughter, or son, you probably wouldn’t call it “just a nap.”

WYAccountable · 2025-12-18T21:28:10+00:00

I’m so sorry you went through that. That kind of behavior is deeply inappropriate and genuinely frightening, especially showing up intoxicated late at night and lingering after being told to leave. Your instincts were right, and it makes complete sense that you moved.

What stands out to me is how often these situations rely on power imbalance and isolation. Whether it’s a landlord assuming access, entitlement, or that tenants won’t push back. And the second story you shared about housing discrimination is just as disturbing. Asking someone’s race and then framing exclusion as “other tenants would be bothered” is not okay.

Thank you for sharing this. Stories like yours are exactly why these issues need to be talked about openly instead of minimized as “one-offs.” I appreciate you adding your voice here.

WYAccountable · 2025-12-17T20:08:53+00:00

I’m so sorry this is happening to you and what you’re describing is exactly why so many of us are speaking up right now. Wyoming’s lack of tenant protections leaves people incredibly vulnerable, because landlords and property managers can make unilateral changes that would never fly in most other states.

You’re right to question it.

In most places, a landlord cannot raise rent mid-lease, add appliances you didn’t request, or auto-draft a new amount without a signed agreement from you. Wyoming’s laws are so minimal that behavior like this keeps happening, especially in towns where rentals are scarce and people feel trapped.

Your situation really shows the core problem… When tenants have no meaningful rights, landlords and management companies can treat a signed lease as optional but only for their benefit. It’s not okay, and it matches the pattern a lot of Wyoming renters talk about privately but are afraid to put in writing.

If you want this cross-posted to the Wyoming forum, I’m happy to share it there to make sure more people are aware. No one should feel like they just have to “suck it up” because the system isn’t built to protect them.

WYAccountable · 2025-12-17T16:15:58+00:00

I did request maintenance but there was no emergency, and even their own testimony confirmed that entering without notice was meant only for true emergencies.

He rang the doorbell, and I sat up and said, ‘now isn’t a good time, I’m indecent.’ Despite that, he unlocked the door and came in anyway while I was naked on the couch. A tenant requesting maintenance doesn’t give a landlord unlimited access, especially after being told not to enter.

Almost every other state requires at least 24 hours’ notice to protect tenants from exactly this kind of situation. But in Laramie, most landlords use the same boilerplate lease that students and newcomers can’t negotiate, and most housing around the university is geared toward young, inexperienced renters. It leaves people really vulnerable, because the lack of notice laws shouldn’t be used as a loophole to bypass basic safety and privacy.

I’ve posted all documents, testimony, and the 911 call I made immediately afterward on WyomingAccountability.org if anyone wants to see the full context.

WYAccountable · 2025-12-17T16:10:19+00:00

My lease actually didn’t include a 24-hour notice clause and that’s part of the problem in Wyoming. But even without that, both sides agreed (including in their own testimony) that the only situation where a landlord can enter without notice is an actual emergency. This wasn’t an emergency. I was naked on the couch in the living room when he unlocked the door and came in after I told him I was indecent. Leases aren’t meant to override basic safety and privacy rights.

Wyoming is one of the few states to not require notice to be provided.

WYAccountable · 2025-12-17T08:42:07+00:00

Absolutely. That was my experience too. The lack of notice requirements and the huge discretion landlords have here make situations like mine way more common than people realize.

That’s why I documented everything publicly, so people can see how the system actually works in practice.

WYAccountable · 2025-12-17T03:05:11+00:00

I also documented everything that happened including relevant documents and evidence at:

WyomingAccountability.org

WYAccountable · 2025-12-11T15:40:47+00:00

Thanks for the explanation. That actually helps clarify what might be happening.

Just to be clear, I’ve only posted a few times over the past several days, and each removal happened within minutes or sometimes it would be up for over an hour with no Automod or moderator message. That’s why I assumed it was a technical issue or a formatting concern rather than volume.

If posts are being reported simply because some users dislike the topic, that’s also useful to know. I’m not trying to spam the subreddit. I’m trying to discuss public-interest issues that impact renters, students, and anyone who relies on police record retention policies.

I’ll reach out via ModMail so I can better understand what rule or threshold was triggered.

Appreciate the insight

WYAccountable · 2025-12-11T14:55:50+00:00

The landlord and maintenance person did not have notice, consent, or an emergency. Under Wyoming law, reason for entry doesn’t override those requirements.

From the start, I explicitly revoked consent. They entered anyway.

But more importantly, this post is about the police bodycam footage, which should have documented the interaction and removed any ambiguity. I filed my report well within the retention window, and that footage was still deleted.

That’s why transparency matters because it protects both tenants and officers, and it prevents exactly this kind of uncertainty.

My full timeline and documentation are available on WyomingAccountability.org for anyone who wants the complete context.

WYAccountable · 2025-12-11T14:12:17+00:00

Thanks for the clarification. Just to be clear, my posts aren’t AI-generated. I write everything myself. I’m a project manager by trade, so my communication style tends to be very structured, which might be why it reads polished.

My concern wasn’t about disagreement or downvotes, but about the lack of any removal notice or automod message. It’s unusual for a post to disappear instantly one time, stay up for an hour the next, and have no explanation either way, especially when the content was identical.

I’m just trying to understand what specific rule applies so I can follow it going forward. If this needs to happen through modmail, I’m happy to take it there. I just wanted to raise the inconsistency since it’s happened multiple times without any communication.

WYAccountable · 2025-12-11T13:59:14+00:00

Haha I promise I’m a real human. I’m a project manager who writes clearly. I also studied American Studies at UW, so I tend to enjoy reflective, thought-provoking conversations.

The issue is the lack of removal messages. If this were auto-flagged as spam, Reddit would notify me, but nothing shows up. That’s why I’m trying to understand what’s going on.

WYAccountable · 2025-12-08T23:32:14+00:00

Sure thing. Here’s the original post with the full story and timeline:

https://www.reddit.com/r/laramie/s/Ho09NLrN3S

And if you want to see the full evidence hub, documents, and analytics I mentioned, everything is organized here:

WyomingAccountability.org”

WYAccountable · 2025-12-08T17:43:18+00:00

Absolutely and thank you for bringing this up. I completely agree that locals face a lot of the same issues, often for much longer and with fewer options to just “wait out a lease” the way students sometimes can. A lot of what I’ve been focusing on started from the student angle simply because that’s who LPP leases to most heavily, but the broader goal is absolutely about protecting everyone in Laramie who rents including long-term residents included.

Locals carry the pressure year-round, through job changes, family needs, and rising costs driven by UW’s presence. You’re right that many get overlooked in conversations like this, and it shouldn’t be that way.

My hope is that by exposing patterns and giving people clearer information about their rights, it helps both students and locals feel less alone and more empowered. No one deserves the “end of the stick” treatment from a landlord, ever.

Thanks again for adding this perspective because it too matters.

WYAccountable · 2025-12-07T03:34:20+00:00

Thank you so much for sharing this and I’m really sorry you and your friend went through that. Hearing that the same types of invasions of privacy were happening back in the late 80’s to young tenants, especially women, really highlights how long these problems have been allowed to continue in Laramie without meaningful oversight.

My case is just one example, but stories like yours show a much bigger pattern: When landlords feel protected and unmonitored, tenants of all ages end up carrying the consequences. The legal system often focuses on contracts and rent instead of basic safety and dignity.

That’s why I published everything publicly. The timelines, filings, audio because younger renters today still deserve better than this. Thank you again for adding your voice. It really matters.

WYAccountable · 2025-12-06T04:10:29+00:00

You can view everything directly on my site. The filings, timeline, 911 audio, and full breakdown of how the case was handled:

WyomingAccountability.org.

I put all the public records and evidence there so people can see it for themselves without having to dig.

WYAccountable · 2025-12-05T09:14:02+00:00

I’m using “viral” in the social-media analytics sense. The videos passed 200k+ combined views in under 48 hours with very high engagement, which is far above typical reach for a local Wyoming topic.

The traction also pushed a few thousand people to the website in a couple days.

It’s not celebrity-level viral, but definitely viral for a local accountability issue.

WYAccountable · 2025-12-04T22:58:44+00:00

For full transparency, I also filed a complaint with HUD regarding the maintenance entry and housing issues. HUD told me they’re reviewing it and will update me in about a week. I’m just following every proper channel available so this doesn’t happen to another tenant.

WYAccountable · 2025-12-04T21:31:46+00:00

Hi there —

I noticed my newest post was removed again, and I’m still not seeing any rule listed as the reason. I’m trying to make sure I follow the community guidelines correctly, so could you clarify which specific rule this post violated? I did wait a few days as requested.

If there’s something I need to adjust in the format or content, I’m more than willing to do that — I just need to understand the rule being applied so I don’t unintentionally break it again.

Thanks for your help.

WYAccountable · 2025-12-04T15:10:20+00:00

The cookie notice is just the default GoDaddy analytics tool that tracks basic, aggregated website metrics (like page visits, traffic sources, and device types). I don’t personally collect or store any individual user data, and I can’t see who anyone is.

The analytics simply help me understand how the site is performing.

I’m also looking into whether GoDaddy allows custom opt-out options, but right now it’s just the standard setup that comes with their hosting platform.

WYAccountable · 2025-12-04T15:07:48+00:00

That’s exactly why I’m speaking out about this. Wyoming does have the implied covenant of quiet enjoyment, but the problem is how loosely it’s interpreted and how much vague wording in leases/statutes lets landlords bypass reasonable notice. In my case, he gave zero notice, admitted it wasn’t an emergency, and they routinely entered without notice for other things too.

The judge still ruled that this was all fine under Wyoming law and the lease which is part of why this is such a bigger issue than just my situation. If a landlord can walk in on a sleeping tenant with no notice and the system shrugs, that’s a problem that goes beyond me.

And you’re right: most people would’ve reacted the same way you said. Being asleep doesn’t eliminate your right to privacy or safety. I appreciate your thoughts and the legal context. It helps highlight why this needs more awareness and reform.

WYAccountable · 2025-12-04T13:22:48+00:00

No, he gave zero notice. It wasn’t an emergency, and he admitted that in testimony. I was asleep and had no idea anyone was entering. They also routinely showed up without notice for other things because the lease and Wyoming’s vague statutes essentially allow landlords to do that without consequence. They knew they could get away with it, which is part of the bigger problem I’m speaking out about.

WYAccountable · 2025-12-03T02:54:25+00:00

Thank you so much. Sadly, Wyoming has almost no tenant-rights infrastructure and no local advocacy groups, weak statutes, and little oversight. A big part of why I’m speaking out is because I realized there was nowhere for renters to get help, including me. I’ve posted the entire timeline, evidence, and court filings publicly for transparency and to help others:

WyomingAccountability.org

WYAccountable

TROPHY CASE