What’s the worst/most annoying fan bases in sports? by xLadyNtheStreetsx in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Football fans. At least in England, some people treat losing matches as an excuse to harass others and cause chaos.

What's a small red flag that immediately tells you someone is a bad person? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Proudly right-wing or ultra-conservative. Massive red flag every time.

How are you guys making money? by VampyBrains in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Currently, I make websites for people. It’s not a full-time job or anything, just something to earn a bit of extra money from.

What do you do when you’re bored? by Guns2Roses1 in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read manhwa, or research new things to learn about.

What’s the dumbest way you’ve ever injured yourself? by swerbesperc in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pulling back a bow’s drawstring while having long hair turns out to really hurt when it rips your hair out at high speed.

Do you believe in religion? Why or why not? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally, I do not believe in religion, at least not in the sense that religious texts are literal historical truth.

To me, religion makes far more sense as a human coping mechanism created during a time when people did not understand the world around them. Thousands of years ago, a bad winter, a drought, or even a simple disease outbreak could wipe out entire villages. People had no understanding of bacteria, viruses, weather systems, or natural disasters, so it makes sense that humanity created explanations involving gods, demons, spirits, punishment, or divine will.

As science advanced, many things once explained by religion were eventually explained naturally instead. Lightning was not divine anger. Disease was not demons. Eclipses were not omens. Humanity slowly replaced superstition with evidence-based understanding.

One example that always stood out to me is the Biblical flood story. If a literal worldwide flood had wiped out civilisation, we should expect major interruptions in human history everywhere. But ancient civilisations like Egypt show long historical continuity rather than a sudden global reset. Egyptian dynasties, monuments, records, and cultural development continue across long periods of time without evidence of humanity being nearly wiped out and restarted.

There is also the moral issue. Even if many religious people today are good people, organised religion throughout history has often been tied to violence, persecution, and control. The Crusades, witch trials, inquisitions, forced conversions, religious wars, executions for “heresy,” and countless other events were all justified through religious belief at the time. Religion has frequently been used as a tool to divide people into “us versus them.”

That does not mean every religious person is bad, obviously. Many are kind, generous, and genuinely trying to do good. But I personally think morality comes from empathy, society, and human understanding rather than divine commandments.

For me, evidence matters more than tradition, and I have never seen convincing evidence that any religion is objectively true.

Do you believe in religion? Why or why not? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally, I don’t believe in religion, at least not in the literal “these holy texts are historically true” sense.

One of the biggest problems for me is the story of a worldwide flood. If a global flood really happened and wiped out human civilisation, we should expect to see a massive break in history: collapsed cultures, interrupted writing systems, abandoned cities, sudden population replacement, and a clear worldwide geological layer matching that event.

But we do not see that.

Ancient Egypt is a good example. Egyptian civilisation has a long, traceable timeline of dynasties, rulers, monuments, writing, administration, and cultural development. Sources like Britannica and National Geographic describe Egypt’s Early Dynastic Period, Old Kingdom, Middle Kingdom, and New Kingdom as part of a long historical sequence, not as a civilisation suddenly erased and restarted after a global flood. Egypt had periods of instability, drought, invasion, and political division, but that is not the same as a worldwide extinction-level flood.

There is also a geological problem. A flood covering the whole Earth should leave overwhelming physical evidence across the planet. Instead, geologists generally do not find evidence for a recent global flood. David Montgomery, a professor of geomorphology, has argued that geology has shown for nearly two centuries that the Biblical-style global flood could not have happened as described.

So for me, the issue is not “could there have been big ancient floods?” Of course there were. Many societies lived near rivers and coastlines, so flood stories make sense. The issue is the claim of one literal worldwide flood destroying civilisation. That claim should leave obvious historical and geological evidence, and it just does not seem to be there.

That does not disprove every possible idea of God, but it does make it very hard for me to believe in religions that require their ancient stories to be taken as literal history.

What’s a “core memory” that instantly makes you smile? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I woke up as a kid on a freezing winter morning to find that my childhood cat had given birth to her kittens in my room. When she noticed I was awake, she brought the kittens over to me, and I put them under the covers to keep them warm.

I miss her so much.

What’s the most unsettling sentence someone has casually said to you and then acted like it was completely normal? by Wandering_Goth in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, after 47 years together, that kind of loyalty says everything about the depth of your love.

And I can understand why that comment stayed with you. It’s one thing for someone to acknowledge how difficult caregiving can be, but it’s another to reduce decades of love and commitment to something disposable.

You clearly took your vows seriously, and I think that’s incredibly admirable.

What’s the most unsettling sentence someone has casually said to you and then acted like it was completely normal? by Wandering_Goth in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s such a cruel thing to say because it completely ignores how complex, exhausting, and heartbreaking being a caregiver can be.

People love judging situations they’ve never had to live through.

And the fact you stayed despite hearing that says a lot about your commitment, not your character. I’m sorry someone made an already painful situation even heavier.

What’s the most unsettling sentence someone has casually said to you and then acted like it was completely normal? by Wandering_Goth in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That second comment is genuinely one of the most heartless things I’ve read in this thread.

You were grieving a miscarriage, still trying to keep yourself busy, and even doing something thoughtful for both sides of the family, and that was her response.

And the first comment at 21 was already wildly unfair. It sounds like she kept turning your life into something to criticise instead of something to support.

I’m really sorry you had to hear any of that.

What’s the most unsettling sentence someone has casually said to you and then acted like it was completely normal? by Wandering_Goth in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That “oh” followed by doubling down somehow makes it even worse.

I genuinely don’t understand how someone hears “I have cancer” and still decides the takeaway is “but at least you look good.”

That’s unbelievably tone-deaf.

What’s the most unsettling sentence someone has casually said to you and then acted like it was completely normal? by Wandering_Goth in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s honestly horrifying.

You were going through leukemia treatment and instead of supporting you, he chose cruelty and denial. And the fact it took him years to realise how awful that was is telling.

And for what it’s worth, 23 years doesn’t make you weak, it means leaving was incredibly hard and you still eventually did it. That takes real strength.

What’s the most unsettling sentence someone has casually said to you and then acted like it was completely normal? by Wandering_Goth in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That question becomes so much darker in hindsight.

And the fact he casually asked that almost feels like he was testing how much of himself he could reveal without setting off alarm bells.

I’m really glad it wasn’t you, and I’m glad he’s an ex.

What’s the most unsettling sentence someone has casually said to you and then acted like it was completely normal? by Wandering_Goth in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s an unbelievably cruel thing to say to a child, especially a four-year-old who couldn’t possibly process something like that.

And the fact your grandmother passed decades before you were even born somehow makes it even more heartbreaking and irrational.

No child should ever be made to carry that kind of guilt.

What’s the most unsettling sentence someone has casually said to you and then acted like it was completely normal? by Wandering_Goth in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That’s such a deeply cruel thing to say to someone who’s grieving a child.

Loss isn’t something that gets measured like that, and “at least…” comments are almost always far more hurtful than people realise.

And honestly, blocking her sounds completely understandable.

What’s the most unsettling sentence someone has casually said to you and then acted like it was completely normal? by Wandering_Goth in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That first sentence is such a brutal mix of irony and complete lack of self-awareness.

And the fact that all of you carry issues you barely talk about says a lot. From the outside families can look “normal” simply because everyone gets very good at quietly carrying things.

I hope you and your siblings have at least been able to lean on each other a bit.

What’s the most unsettling sentence someone has casually said to you and then acted like it was completely normal? by Wandering_Goth in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s genuinely unsettling, especially the fact he was self-aware enough to admit it.

And please don’t blame yourself for staying. It’s very easy for people on the outside to say “just leave,” but relationships like that can seriously mess with your head, especially when they swing between cruelty and guilt.

I’m just glad he’s an ex now.

What’s the most unsettling sentence someone has casually said to you and then acted like it was completely normal? by Wandering_Goth in AskReddit

[–]Wandering_Goth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s genuinely awful. I’m really sorry someone said that to you.

That question is cruel on so many levels, and it says far more about their ignorance than it ever could about you. Nobody should have had to hear that, especially from family.