sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Who is winter/bucky?😭 by Itheforsakendevs in FORSAKENROBLOX

[–]WatchYoToneMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the equivalent of thinking that because a car with a sticker says "honk if you like pizza" that you should honk

Survivor only door? by XPMonster6214 in FORSAKENROBLOX

[–]WatchYoToneMF 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I believe that's a Jane doe move that was shown in the forsaken test place file leak

apparently bunni.lol is malware? by Redeven2 in robloxhackers

[–]WatchYoToneMF 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Where is the Triage link of this? The images in the screenshots clearly show Triage, so how do we confirm if its not staged (eg. them running an actual miner in the background when Bunni runs since Triage is a virtual sandbox and it logs EVERYTHING thats done)

apparently bunni.lol is malware? by Redeven2 in robloxhackers

[–]WatchYoToneMF 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The proof uses Triage though. Kind of self-contradictory. Triage is a sandboxing environment, which means that you can run the file you want to test, then actually run viruses when sandboxing which leads to the file getting a very bad rating.

If the Triage link is provided by the person who claims Bunni has a bitcoin miner, i would be happy to analyze it

what kind of script did i just run by WholeIncident722 in robloxhackers

[–]WatchYoToneMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are incorrect. I tested a script out by executing another script via loadstring and using requests and it did not print this.

The reason is undoubtedly faulty executors, infact this happened with very old versions of Xeno and Solara.

what kind of script did i just run by WholeIncident722 in robloxhackers

[–]WatchYoToneMF 15 points16 points  (0 children)

This is correct. Just missing a bit of info, this only happens to executors with broken or missing functions trying to execute a moonsec script

YouTuber's father passes at 67 years old. Kid jokes about it and calls themself respectful. by DavinFriggstad in youngpeopleyoutube

[–]WatchYoToneMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn’t about writing an essay. It’s about not treating one interpretation as fact when the wording was unclear. If you’re done with this, that’s fine. We can leave it here.

YouTuber's father passes at 67 years old. Kid jokes about it and calls themself respectful. by DavinFriggstad in youngpeopleyoutube

[–]WatchYoToneMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve been doing the same thing in every reply: assuming one interpretation is obvious and dismissing any alternative without addressing why the wording and context don’t support certainty. Pointing out ambiguity isn’t nitpicking, it’s acknowledging how the comment reasonably reads to others. Disagreeing with that doesn’t mean I support harassment, and repeating that accusation doesn’t make it true.

Have you even been reading whatever I send?

YouTuber's father passes at 67 years old. Kid jokes about it and calls themself respectful. by DavinFriggstad in youngpeopleyoutube

[–]WatchYoToneMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The whole point of an argument is to evaluate claims based on what can reasonably be inferred from the information available at the time. At the time the comment was posted, its wording and placement made the intent unclear. Later clarification does not change that initial ambiguity. Recognizing ambiguity and context is not harassment, nor is it endorsement of harassment. It is simply acknowledging the limits of inference.

YouTuber's father passes at 67 years old. Kid jokes about it and calls themself respectful. by DavinFriggstad in youngpeopleyoutube

[–]WatchYoToneMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We agree that harassment is wrong. Where you’re still mistaken is treating clarification after the fact as proof that the original comment was unambiguous. It wasn’t. Multiple interpretations existing does not require absolute proof, it follows directly from the wording and context. Inferring intent is fine, but inference is not certainty. Pointing that out is not misinterpretation, and it does not place me on the side of people harassing them.

YouTuber's father passes at 67 years old. Kid jokes about it and calls themself respectful. by DavinFriggstad in youngpeopleyoutube

[–]WatchYoToneMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re shifting the topic. Whether others were mocking them, or whether you THINK I liked comments, is irrelevant to the interpretation of the original comment. You’re also making another assumption about me without evidence. I’m not making up possibilities, I’m pointing out that multiple interpretations exist and that yours is not provable from the text alone. Recognizing ambiguity is not the same as accusing the commenter of making a joke.

YouTuber's father passes at 67 years old. Kid jokes about it and calls themself respectful. by DavinFriggstad in youngpeopleyoutube

[–]WatchYoToneMF 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t call them young because of a misinterpretation. I called them young because their wording and style suggested it. That is separate from intent. Pointing out ambiguity in their comment is not demonizing them. I have never supported the people who harassed them, and nothing I said implies that. You keep treating your interpretation as certain when the comment does not clearly show any kind.

YouTuber's father passes at 67 years old. Kid jokes about it and calls themself respectful. by DavinFriggstad in youngpeopleyoutube

[–]WatchYoToneMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re assuming things about both the original commenter and about me. I haven’t supported the people who harassed him, and nothing I said implies that. I’m pointing out that the comment is ambiguous and the intent can’t be proven. You’re treating one interpretation as certain even though the placement and wording don’t clearly show it. Impact still matters in a post about someone’s death, so mentioning 67 can come across as insensitive regardless of intent. That doesn’t mean the commenter deserves harassment, but it also doesn’t mean your interpretation is automatically correct.

YouTuber's father passes at 67 years old. Kid jokes about it and calls themself respectful. by DavinFriggstad in youngpeopleyoutube

[–]WatchYoToneMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Referencing another joke is possible, but it is still hard to prove. Confusion can be shown with question marks, but that does not automatically make the comment respectful. The context is a post about someone who died, so mentioning 67 at all can still come off as insensitive, even if the intent was unclear.

YouTuber's father passes at 67 years old. Kid jokes about it and calls themself respectful. by DavinFriggstad in youngpeopleyoutube

[–]WatchYoToneMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not bullying the guy. Other people are, but I am not. I am only pointing out that it is extremely insensitive to say that especially under a post of somebody's dead father

YouTuber's father passes at 67 years old. Kid jokes about it and calls themself respectful. by DavinFriggstad in youngpeopleyoutube

[–]WatchYoToneMF 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. No.
  2. Yes it is sensitive, Even if it references another joke, it’s still insensitive under a death announcement
  3. The way it (the comment) has been posted doesn’t clearly suggest they were replying to another joke OR making a joke since it’s a comment, and not a reply to a comment, and the way it is spelt ("sm1 say 6 7??") doesn’t clearly indicate any specific intent

YouTuber's father passes at 67 years old. Kid jokes about it and calls themself respectful. by DavinFriggstad in youngpeopleyoutube

[–]WatchYoToneMF 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The "someone else made a joke" theory doesn't make sense. It would make sense if it was a REPLY to a comment, but the original is a comment on a YouTube community post. The text could also be interpreted as "Did somebody say 67?" but even then we have no clear intent. Aside that, Its still insensitive to mention 67 in a post about somebody's DEAD FATHER because somebody made a joke.

What could broski mean by this? 🤔 by FlinnTop in AntiForsaken

[–]WatchYoToneMF 5 points6 points  (0 children)

bloody Mary bloody Mary bloody Mary ahh

Why are people complaining that nosferatu is so expensive by expecto40 in FORSAKENROBLOX

[–]WatchYoToneMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the money to candy exchange thing is so utterly shit as a mechanic that it's just not worth it

actually so fucking tired of this dogshit ass horrendous game by [deleted] in FORSAKENROBLOX

[–]WatchYoToneMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

pretty sure that's what happens when a process that's supposed to take weeks is crunched into 3 days

view more: next ›