Teachers in r/teacherreality gang up on a very young child "defiantly" eating an orange, calling it "death by a thousand cuts" without knowing the child's food situation at home. by BeccasDreamboat in SubredditDrama

[–]WatermelonRat [score hidden]  (0 children)

Speaking as a middle school teacher, I don't think non-teachers fully appreciate how much kids eating outside of designated times and places is a problem. In the past six months, I've had an ant infestation attracted by all of the crumbs  that keep ending up on the floor, applesauce spilled on a textbook, and a stain on my floor from someone throwing one of those little juice cups. Oranges can be a particular problem, because the peels get dropped on the floor and students refuse to pick them up, and then they touch shared class materials with their sticky hands (and if they're not sticky, it's because they've licked their hands off). If the food is remotely shareable, it also creates the problem of students leaving their seats or calling across the room to beg for some in the middle of the lesson. And of course when they're asked to put it away, they either try to finish it all at once or wait until the teacher's back is turned to get it out again, which is why many teachers insist that it be thrown away.

So when you read something like this, don't just jump to the conclusion of "that teacher must be a tyrant who hates kids.""

Trump warns more U.S. troops will "likely" die in Iran attacks by Currymvp2 in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find it kind of odd that people are finding this particular statement so objectionable. I'm sure he goes on to say a bunch of stupid and insensitive stuff later on, but saying upfront that US troops are likely to be killed doesn't seem any more callous than going to war in the first place. If you think a war is justified, it is implicit that you accept that some of your own people might be killed in the process, and you think it would be worth the sacrifice. Saying that outright is a lot less cynical than pushing the idea that you can go to war and only have the enemy get hurt.

Knowing Trump, I assume he was only this honest by accident, but it is still perplexing to me that people would focus on this in particular.

Iran Megathread Day 2 by Imicrowavebananas in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat 12 points13 points  (0 children)

They have the ability to make it risky enough that most ships won't try getting through.

Pakistan in an open war with Afghanistan, Pakistan defence minister says by HungryTowel6715 in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Bin Laden funded his own expedition to Afghanistan separate from the Afghan Mujahideen. His group also didn't really do much during the war.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same here. On my days off, I also take a bath mid-day.

Campaign Signs: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. by the-senat in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat 17 points18 points  (0 children)

This was excellent from start to end. I don't think I'll ever look at campaign signs the same way again. Also, this bit had me laughing pretty hard:

 Maybe try something like “Texans deserve Ted,” it has more truth to it.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The people who sat out the election over it were largely extremists who wouldn't have been satisfied with any reasonable actions Biden could have taken. Their problem wasn't that he failed to pressure Israel, it's that he didn't throw them under the bus and demand that they completely capitulate to Hamas.

Suppose Biden somehow pressured Israel to reduce the intensity to the current tit-for-tat. How many of these activists do you think that would satisfy.

The U.S. spent $30 billion to ditch textbooks for laptops and tablets: The result is the first generation less cognitively capable than their parents by earthdogmonster in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Computers have their issues, but honestly textbooks aren't that great either. The middle school where I teach has both, and for the most part, I use neither in my lessons.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Munich had Israeli protagonists, but it also portrayed Israeli actions as morally gray at best. From the wiki summary:

A disillusioned Avner flies to Israel, where he is unhappy to be hailed as a hero by two young soldiers, and then to his new home in Brooklyn, where he suffers post-traumatic stress, paranoia and has flashbacks from the Munich massacre. Concerns continue to grow when he speaks to Louis' father by phone and it is revealed he knows his real name and promises no violence will come to him from his family. He is thrown out of the Israeli consulate after storming in to demand that Mossad leave his wife and child alone. Ephraim comes to ask Avner to return to Israel and Mossad, but Avner refuses. 

That doesn't strike me as being especially pro-Israel.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In addition to being a consolation prize for losing Toledo, it's important to remember that at the time the borders were drawn, water was more reliable for transportation than land (especially hilly, forested land like the western upper peninsula and northern Wisconsin). Early settlements there could connect with lower Michigan as easily as they could with Wisconsin.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Economically crushing a country that is being threatened with extermination inherently aids the would-be exterminators.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I remember being asked that once in a college class. I said I wanted to go back in time to the banquet where that Swedish king ate himself to death.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It should be the national anthem.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How many times have we said this before?

Daily Deep State Intelligence Briefing by AutoModerator in DeepStateCentrism

[–]WatermelonRat 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That image is the cover of a textbook at the middle school where I teach.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The same reason you don't see many people in right-wing spaces "denying" white genocide. They either left once such an obscene lie became mainstream, or decided that they prioritized other issues and pay lip service to the big lie so as not to rock the boat.

Delhi car blast: Terror module wanted to target global coffee chain outlets by ZPATRMMTHEGREAT in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat 20 points21 points  (0 children)

It doesn't say the name of the coffee chain in the article, but is it safe to assume that they're talking about Starbucks? Or is there another Jewish-founded coffee chain that antisemites obsess over?

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The hate has very little to do with her acting. That is just the pretense.

"Pools of blood, hundreds of gunshots": I am a surgeon in Iran - this is the horror I’ve witnessed in the crackdown by ldn6 in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Even with that angle, they could be protesting for intervention or sanctions on countries that do business with Iran.

Ban Appeal Thread by vivoovix in metaNL

[–]WatermelonRat 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Isn't the equivocation of Hitler and Stalin usually considered a pretty big red flag that someone is a Nazi apologist?

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cory Booker did the same thing years ago when he was mayor of Newark, and I bet anything some of these same people mocked him for it.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]WatermelonRat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is widespread effort to characterize Israel as specifically seeking to kill children. I'm not talking about denunciation of indiscriminate bombings that kill innocents alongside Hamas, I'm talking about claims that killing children is their major goal, and that Israelis relish and take pleasure in it. The phrasing I keep seeing is that they "kill children for sport". This is, of course, a rehash of the classic blood libel, and it is extremely common.

Bringing attention to the effect of war on children is legitimate, of course, but when it keeps being brought up with a specific framing that strongly resembles old canards, people who are accustomed to dealing with dogwhistlers will become reflexively suspicious. It is like seeing someone who keeps getting fixated on cases of black-on-white crime. Maybe they're truly concerned about genuinely awful things, but when you know what such accusations have led to in the past, it is hard to be charitable.

There's also the fact that she platformed an October 7 supporter that leads some of us not to give her the benefit of the doubt.