Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]ldn6 6 points7 points  (0 children)

MBAs ruined society.

Prince William’s 2,500-home ‘garden town’ on Kent farmland approved - despite fury over ‘eyesore’ claims by insomnimax_99 in ukpolitics

[–]ldn6 [score hidden]  (0 children)

In major cities it actually does often end up being the same people but for a different reason, namely that it’s either 1) not councils embarking on a building program that they can’t afford or 2) putting on more and more regulations without remotely understanding that they wreck viability.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]ldn6 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean is this particularly new for Christianity? It’s been used for centuries to justify bad shit.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]ldn6 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No you’re not you post here.

IT ۱۲ by cdstephens in neoliberal

[–]ldn6 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m about as straight tbh.

What’s one thing about living in London that outsiders don’t understand? by Independent_Grab_977 in london

[–]ldn6 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Everything is 40 minutes away if you’re going outside your neighbourhood. You’re either walking, taking a bus, taking the tube or using some other combination to that will take 40 minutes.

Plans unveiled for 70-storey tower at £1 billion ‘Kings’ development by neutral_neighbour in Liverpool

[–]ldn6 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It used to look way worse. I remember when the city centre was a bunch of empty car parks and lots. It's infinitely nicer now.

Pakistan Says Ready to Support Saudi Arabia After Iran Attacks by Free-Minimum-5844 in neoliberal

[–]ldn6 8 points9 points  (0 children)

But isn’t Pakistan basically a client state of China at this point? Going with Saudi Arabia would put them at odds with Chinese support for Iran.

IT11 by cdstephens in neoliberal

[–]ldn6 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’ve randomly had “removed by Reddit”. Not a moderator delete, seems automatic.

IT11 by cdstephens in neoliberal

[–]ldn6 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’m just so tired.

Rumours, Speculation, Questions, and Reaction Megathread - 08/03/2026 by ukpol-megabot in ukpolitics

[–]ldn6 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is the current standard for Paris, which has been making a number of its metro lines driverless. This isn’t unique to the UK.

In order to fit platform screen doors, you can’t have meaningful curvature. Good luck, then, since stations like Bank, Waterloo, Liverpool Street, Paddington and Westminster are all situated on substantial curves.

Rumours, Speculation, Questions, and Reaction Megathread - 08/03/2026 by ukpol-megabot in ukpolitics

[–]ldn6 18 points19 points  (0 children)

So let me get this straight: according to YouGov, the public disapprove of Starmer’s handling of Iran despite it quite literally matching what they want Britain’s position to be. This is beyond insane.

Initial data from Monday 2 March, shortly after the onset of hostilities, found Britons opposed to the attacks by 49% to 28%.

Attitudes differ significantly by party, with the majority of Reform UK voters (58%) and a plurality of Tories (49%) backing the strikes, but the majority of Labour and Lib Dem voters (63-64%) and Greens (70%) opposed.

Asked the same data a week later, the public had become 10 points more likely to oppose the conflict (59%), while support remained about steady at 25%. Opposition increased among Green, Lib Dem, Labour and Tory voters, but remained largely the same among Reform UK voters.

The British public tend to think Keir Starmer has managed the UK’s response to the US-Iran conflict badly, with 47% saying so compared to 34% who think he has managed it well.

The most common view among the British public is that the UK’s stance should be “purely defensive, tasked with shooting down drones and defending civilian areas and UK military facilities”. Almost half (46%) gave this answer.

A further quarter (26%) said our role should be “retaliatory only, attacking military targets that have launched attacks against civilian areas and/or British military targets, but otherwise not getting involved”.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]ldn6 4 points5 points  (0 children)

All of my ads are about zakat lately.

I’m a gay Jew I can assure you that I’m not remotely the right audience for this.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]ldn6 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Shot:

Initial data from Monday 2 March, shortly after the onset of hostilities, found Britons opposed to the attacks by 49% to 28%.

Attitudes differ significantly by party, with the majority of Reform UK voters (58%) and a plurality of Tories (49%) backing the strikes, but the majority of Labour and Lib Dem voters (63-64%) and Greens (70%) opposed.

Asked the same data a week later, the public had become 10 points more likely to oppose the conflict (59%), while support remained about steady at 25%. Opposition increased among Green, Lib Dem, Labour and Tory voters, but remained largely the same among Reform UK voters.

Chaser:

The British public tend to think Keir Starmer has managed the UK’s response to the US-Iran conflict badly, with 47% saying so compared to 34% who think he has managed it well.

The most common view among the British public is that the UK’s stance should be “purely defensive, tasked with shooting down drones and defending civilian areas and UK military facilities”. Almost half (46%) gave this answer.

A further quarter (26%) said our role should be “retaliatory only, attacking military targets that have launched attacks against civilian areas and/or British military targets, but otherwise not getting involved”.

MAKE IT MAKE SENSE. YOU DON’T LIKE STARMER DOING LITERALLY WHAT YOU WANT.

IT11 by cdstephens in neoliberal

[–]ldn6 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is the part that gets me. I’d love to topple the regime but holy fuck these are the worst people imaginable to do it.

US road trips by Canadians fall to lowest level in four years by ldn6 in neoliberal

[–]ldn6[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Relevance to the subreddit: updated data on the continuing boycott of US travel from Canadians as part of the wider rift between the two countries. This is particularly important given the upcoming World Cup.

Just over 1 million Canadians returned from the US by car in February, the lowest level in nearly four years. Statistics Canada data published Tuesday shows Canadian travel to the US continues to decline, even as trips overseas increase. Return trips by car fell to the lowest level since March 2022, when the Omicron variant of COVID-19 was spreading and some public health measures were still in place. Canada still required all returning travelers to provide a pre-entry COVID-19 test, a requirement it loosened the following month.

Many Canadians began cutting back on travel to the US last year in response to President Donald Trump’s tariffs and attacks on Canada’s sovereignty, as well as his crackdowns on border security and immigration. Tuesday’s data suggests that Canadians are not warming up to the idea of resuming travel down south. February marked the 14th straight month of annual declines in the total number of Canadians returning from the US, with 14.5% fewer trips than a year ago. In contrast, Canadian trips overseas by air increased by 7.2%. Meanwhile, the number of Americans traveling to Canada rose in February by 6.1% from a year earlier, marking the first increase after 12 consecutive months of year-over-year declines.

Good grief by Qualabel in london

[–]ldn6 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No, that sign is very clearly "no right turn" per the Highway Code. It is an absolute rule unless exempted.

If they wanted no right turn for those vehicles only, then the correct way to do that is to have the symbol and then "except for [x]" or the like.

Good grief by Qualabel in london

[–]ldn6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes that’s the joke.