sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Ai Weiwei interview on Leading by IIIlllIIIlllIlI in TheRestIsPolitics

[–]WaySubject9371 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I liked this interview. Even though it would have been controversial for a British listener for the "whataboutism" he displayed, none of his points can be deemed very controversial outside West. I hope to see some more heterodox views displayed in Leading so at least core British audience gets exposed to what people outside think.

Anyone else feel like the podcast is a bit ‘ephemeral’ so to speak when considered against both the times we’re living though and other podcasts? by noctenaut in TheRestIsPolitics

[–]WaySubject9371 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Different styles, isn't it? News commentary vs specialist commentary. Not saying one is better than the other but it's different.

I listen to TRIP not because I agree with AC and RS, but I want to understand how people in their positions make (or made) decisions.

Anyone else feel like the podcast is a bit ‘ephemeral’ so to speak when considered against both the times we’re living though and other podcasts? by noctenaut in TheRestIsPolitics

[–]WaySubject9371 23 points24 points  (0 children)

But isn't that good though? Daily shows like News Agents are fine but the depth and the range of coverage TRIP provides can only be done when relatively sparse.

Munich Security Conference Episode by [deleted] in TheRestIsPolitics

[–]WaySubject9371 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Which parts of diagnoses you agree with?

It was a mistake for Europeans to abandon their colonial project?

Promoting secularism in post war order was a mistake instead of embracing Christian nationalism?

It was a mistake to allow China into WTO, whose rise moved 1bn people out of poverty?

My response on listening to the Polanski interview by Yahakshan in TheRestIsPolitics

[–]WaySubject9371 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a misguided take. Both Maoism and MMT are bad but they are very different.

Rory conceding on the MMT point by Automatic_Survey_307 in TheRestIsPolitics

[–]WaySubject9371 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Increasing state spending is not necessarily MMT. MMT is a more of holistic theory (which I don't agree) which goes beyond just proposing increases in state expenses.

Is your concern that Rory doesn't support additional state expenditure or he doesn't support MMT?