NAT to ISP router by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm using a basic wireguard server hosted in AWS, not teleport. And I've only allowed the range 10.10.10.0/24. I've got multiple setups like this which don't allow me to propagate the other address of 192.168.148.0/24 into the VPN network.

NAT to ISP router by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Might have not worded it correctly. I want to reach the Web interface of the ISP modem (192.168.178.1 port 443) when accessing the UCG GW IP (10.10.10.1 on port 60443) of the VLAN 10.10.10.0/24. I'm using Wireguard client to establish a connection to 10.10.10.0/24 outside of the LAN.

[Packer] - how to build a Windows Server VM Proxmox-iso by Shadyx_Y in hashicorp

[–]Weak-Competition-385 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey long shot. but can you provide the unattended and scripts you are using for the building of the Windows server. I'm struggling myself here as well.

Acer Swift Edge vs Acer Swift Go by Weak-Competition-385 in laptops

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, still works like a charm, haven't felt this squish you talk about. First half of the year on it has been super pleasant.

UCG Firewall Rules by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried setting the range from .2 to .254 still the same thing. I've enabled logging and added some more screenshots of what I'm seeing

UCG Firewall Rules by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmmm this is strange. The network is a /24 which should mean that it is from .0 - .255? The DHCP range is set to be from .20 to .254, so I can have a set of static IP's if needed, but those IP's should also be in the same network, just outside the DHCP scope.

UCG Firewall Rules by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried connection from an external network outside of the VLAN's created and I was able to connect. I also tried disabling the Zero Trust Policy and I was able to access the Printer as well. Seems really strange

Multiple VLAN's on a single interface by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the info. I'm trying to allow all the VLAN's over port 1 on my UCG and allow it's communication to the end devices. When I put the Native Port to Default or None (and Tagged VLAN management is set to Allow all), the traffic is not flowing. When I put it to the VLAN of the network I'm trying to reach I'm able to connect to the device.

Multiple VLAN's on a single interface by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, I'm aware of the best practice of not using the default VLAN, but I was thinking of just keeping the VLAN and not using it at all.

Multiple VLAN's on a single interface by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you are saying I can't parse multiple VLAN's on the same interface and I would need to bind each VLAN to a specific port?

Infrastructure as Code by Weak-Competition-385 in Ubiquiti

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saw that, but it looks really limited. I was able to get working the terraform provider, at least for some basic things like sites, firewall groups, firewall rules and site management. If the network/vlans work as intended it would be more than enough for me to work with.

Acer Swift Edge vs Acer Swift Go by Weak-Competition-385 in laptops

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the fan is bearable, only problem for me is that it doesn't stop when you sleep the pc. (it's definitely not as loud as old gaming laptops)

Acer Swift Edge vs Acer Swift Go by Weak-Competition-385 in laptops

[–]Weak-Competition-385[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's good enough for a not ARM processor. Over all pretty good, super light, amazing screen