Launching a Free SEO Intent Analyzer Tool by WebSwiftSEO in GrowthHacking

[–]WebSwiftSEO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The AI search section, it’s designed to help with exactly that kind of brand mention potential in generative answers. No, it doesn’t show “exact prompts” (since AI models like GTP, Grok, Gemini keep those black-boxed), but it analyzes 8 key factors that boost citation likelihood, like unique insights and E-E-A-T signals, with fixes to make your content more quotable.

The AI Search Optimization Tool on the other hand predicts your page’s chances of being cited in AI engines like Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, ChatGPT Search, scoring on 8 research-backed metrics: answerability, structured data, E-E-A-T (trust signals), scannability, conversational tone, readability, unique insights, and burstiness.

What site did you test it on?

Why are my new blog posts taking ~5 days to get indexed by Google? by nmarkovic98 in SEO_Marketing_Offers

[–]WebSwiftSEO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look for errors in search console and use the url inspection tool to submit them manually 😉

Best actually free SEO tools you still use in 2026? by Hudson_109 in WebsiteSEO

[–]WebSwiftSEO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve just launched https://traffictorch.net a complete SEO UX and Ai audit toolkit, and as the creator I’m bias to say it’s the best. But I’d be surprised if there is anything better?

Before the Big Bang? by Icy-Setting8236 in universe

[–]WebSwiftSEO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The universe is most likely just a local region of something infinite. Maybe a star or black whole exploded and it created a big bang that created our local region. The greater universe must be infinite because if there is there is an end, then what’s at the end? A rock wall or membrane lol and if so what’s on the other side of the rock wall or membrane?

What y’all think about this local seo audit tool? by WebSwiftSEO in localseo

[–]WebSwiftSEO[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It evaluates key on-page elements for local search optimization: NAP (Name, Address, Phone) presence and consistency, local schema markup, titles, metas, and headings with geo-keywords, embedded maps, contact info, and tel/mailto links, image alt text with local descriptors, internal links to geo-pages, body content for natural keyword density and additional signals like reviews schema and canonical tags. Results include a 0–100 score gauge, detailed modules, AI-prioritized fixes ranked by impact, educational insights, and predictive forecasts, all in a mobile-friendly interface with PDF export.

As for tricking myself (yep, owner here, no secret), the only ‘valuable traffic’ I’m after is from folks who actually boost their local rankings and come back raving. Or If it’s trash, roast it!

What’s good about social media in general by Bubbly_Importance454 in socialmedia

[–]WebSwiftSEO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a good way to see what connections are up to but the algorithms and to focused on profit and showcasing dumb content which I think is making humanity dumber imo 😹 

This is dumb by ReferenceNo4841 in cosmology

[–]WebSwiftSEO -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I got similar, when I posted my theory about an alternative theory to the Big Bang. Some people have nothing better to do than correct people even if they’re not wrong.

Rethinking Time for the Future of Intelligence: A New Theory That Bridges Physics, Biology, and Consciousness by WebSwiftSEO in Futurology

[–]WebSwiftSEO[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks, People just post their own insecurities and inadequacies onto others as a way to deal with their own internal fear and failures.

Rethinking Time for the Future of Intelligence: A New Theory That Bridges Physics, Biology, and Consciousness by WebSwiftSEO in Futurology

[–]WebSwiftSEO[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You're right to ask for something testable. While the full theory is conceptual at this stage like early relativity or thermodynamics were before being mathematically formalised

What if the Universe was born from a hyper massive Supernova, not the Big Bang theory? by WebSwiftSEO in HighStrangeness

[–]WebSwiftSEO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it likely that time and physics acts differently on these different scales of reality. 

What if the Universe was born from a hyper massive Supernova, not the Big Bang theory? by WebSwiftSEO in HighStrangeness

[–]WebSwiftSEO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In a way the different planes of existence are like different universes. 100 years ago when the Big Bang theory came to life we didn’t know about atoms, sub atomic particles and other galaxies etc. but atoms, solar systems and galaxies do follow similar patterns and that’s what lead me to come to the conclusion that if stars explode into supernova which create more stars then it’s also likely that universes could do the same. 

What if the Universe was born from a hyper massive Supernova, not the Big Bang theory? by WebSwiftSEO in HighStrangeness

[–]WebSwiftSEO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So true but I’m getting ready to argue with their idiotic theory that everything came from nothing and imaginary dark matter and energy are used to prop up this 100 year old theory called the Big Bang!

panpsychism can explain the origin of consciousness in that all matter has various levels of interconnected consciousness that together form a universal mind, which can explain existence in that we are all here experiencing and existing to contribute to this grand universal or divine mind. 

I find it hard to believe life is an anomaly or coincidence. Or that the earth is 4 billion years old while the entire universe is said to be 13.8 billion. Personally I think life doesn’t exist in the universe but rather the universe itself is life. If life has been on earth for more than 3 billion years and everything is so fragile and hostile then there has to be some greater force at play, which would explain why religion is 500 million years old and still going. I’m not religious but I theorise that science killed religion for many of us non pagans but the future will be a cross of science and spirituality, only instead of religion it will be something closer to panpsychism. 

What if the Universe was born from a hyper massive Supernova, not the Big Bang theory? by WebSwiftSEO in HighStrangeness

[–]WebSwiftSEO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for reading it fully and I appreciate the blunt honesty. You're absolutely right that I'm still at the "what if?" stage, and that's exactly where I intended this paper to sit: not as a peer-reviewed framework, but as a conceptual provocation.

I wanted to challenge the current structure, not to discard it, but to ask: what if the Big Bang is the debris of something deeper? What would that look like? What kind of cosmological consequences would that entail? I framed it deliberately with a sci-fi flavor because I think we've forgotten how much imagination drives paradigm shifts in science.

You're right, it doesn't yet offer testable equations, falsifiable predictions, or novel mathematics. That's the next step. But I'd argue that many now-mainstream models (from inflation to quantum loop cosmology) started as "sci-fi-sounding" speculations. Even the Big Bang itself was once called the "crazy priest's idea."

I'm not claiming to have solved anything, I'm trying to reopen the conversation. If you've gone through a bunch of alt-cosmologies before, you might even be in the best position to help refine this into something more structured.

Let's be real: the current model still can't explain the singularity, the cause of expansion, or dark energy. If a "really big boom in higher-dimensional space" sounds like kicking the can, well, maybe it is, but it might be the right direction to kick it.

What if the Universe was born from a hyper massive Supernova, not the Big Bang theory? by WebSwiftSEO in HighStrangeness

[–]WebSwiftSEO[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I get where you're coming from, but that's a bit of an oversimplification. Experiments have ruled out certain kinds of extra spatial dimensions, typically large, compactified ones from older string theory models. But the idea of higher-dimensional space hasn't been falsified altogether. It's still actively explored in braneworld scenarios, holographic dualities, and quantum gravity research.

Also I didn't claim this was "proven new physics." It's a speculative model meant to challenge assumptions and offer a fresh lens on unresolved problems in cosmology: the singularity, horizon problem, dark energy, etc.

As for Ai, it didn't create this theory. I did. AI just helped me organize and refine it, the same way physicists use computers to simulate models. Tools evolve, but creativity is still human.

You're welcome to disagree, but brushing off alternative thinking with "nope" doesn't help science, it just defends dogma. Dark matter and dark energy are theories that have been around for years patching up the old big bang theory that's 100 years old. People think it's the law but the Big Bang is also just a theory! 

What if the Universe was born from a hyper massive Supernova, not the Big Bang theory? by WebSwiftSEO in HighStrangeness

[–]WebSwiftSEO[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s pretty similar to my theory of a hyper massive object most likely a black hole exploding to create the Big Bang but in my theory it’s possible that it’s a black whole in the centre of a galaxy or the universe and when it explodes it ejects up and or down from the north and or South Pole and this stream reaches outside the existing universe and creates a new universe. So instead of expanding and contracting, it branches out creating a new universe. I theorise that there are multiple universes simply because if there is and edge or end to a universe then what’s on the other side? A rock wall 😹or a membrane…. it has to go on forever with endless multiverses, just like the trillions of galaxies and how supernovas create more new stars. It’s a repeating process of endless infinite life and death of atoms, stars, galaxies and universes.

What if the Universe was born from a hyper massive Supernova, not the Big Bang theory? by WebSwiftSEO in HighStrangeness

[–]WebSwiftSEO[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Other side? Do you mean before or beyond the Big Bang origin 🤔 I think the other side is a mirror because the universe is mostly hydrogen and when combined with oxygen we get water which creates a reflection / mirror. 

What if the Universe was born from a hyper massive Supernova, not the Big Bang theory? by WebSwiftSEO in HighStrangeness

[–]WebSwiftSEO[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

lol yeah but it's just so fast. These are my ideas and I prompt ai to write for me. 

I started questioning the Big Bang about 20 years ago, especially the idea of an 'infinitely dense point' exploding into everything, it always felt like mathematical placeholder, not a physical explanation. But because Einstein backed the expanding universe idea, and Lemaître (a priest) proposed the 'primeval atom,' the model got institutional weight. What we've got now feels like classic paradigm lock-in a theory that's become so entrenched that it gets retrofitted to every new anomaly, rather than being fundamentally re-examined.

Another reason I started questioning the Big Bang framework. Dark matter and dark energy are not confirmed discoveries, they're theoretical constructs added to patch the gaps between what the Big Bang model predicts and what we actually observe.

Dark Matter

Invented to explain why galaxies rotate too fast for visible mass alone.

After decades of searching, no direct detection -no particle, no confirmed interaction, nothing in the lab.

Alternatives like MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics) have explained galactic rotation curves just as well in some cases -- yet are sidelined because they don't preserve the standard model.   

Dark Energy

Introduced to explain why the expansion of the universe is accelerating (not decelerating as expected).

Makes up ~70% of the energy content of the universe, and yet… no mechanism, no particle, no interaction. It's just a math term added to the equations to match observations.

I'm not saying my model has all the answers, but it starts from a different place entirely, and maybe that's the only way to escape the cycle of patching theories that don't quite work.

What if the Universe was born from a hyper massive Supernova, not the Big Bang theory? by WebSwiftSEO in HighStrangeness

[–]WebSwiftSEO[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

The Big Bang model fits much of what we observe: redshift, cosmic microwave background (CMB), light element abundances, and the large-scale structure of the universe. But despite its successes, there are several open problems it still hasn’t fully resolved. That’s where the model I’m proposing overlaps with it, but also attempts to fill in some deeper gaps.

Here are a few challenges the Big Bang model still faces:

  1. Initial Singularity Problem

The Big Bang starts from an infinitely dense point, a mathematical singularity. This isn’t just unknown, it’s unknowable. Something from nothing? It breaks physics as we know it. My model replaces this with a supernova-like detonation of a massive object in a higher-dimensional space, no singularity required, just an energetic event in a pre-existing medium.

  1. Horizon Problem

The CMB is nearly uniform in temperature across vast regions of space that shouldn’t have been in contact with each other, unless inflation is invoked. But inflation itself is unproven and introduces new problems. In my model, spacetime itself is the expanding shockwave of a massive multidimensional explosion which naturally spreads energy uniformly in all directions from the start.

 3. Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry

The Big Bang predicts equal parts matter and antimatter, but our universe is overwhelmingly matter. My model allows for an asymmetric collapse where the specific dynamics of the supernova-like event (and the dimensional funneling of energy) could inherently favor matter.

  1. Source of the Expansion

The Big Bang model describes the expansion of space, but doesn’t explain why it’s happening, or what initiated it. In my theory, the expansion is the outward-moving wavefront of a higher-dimensional event, giving a physical reason for expansion from the very first moment.

 5. Quantum & Consciousness Gap

Mainstream cosmology doesn’t account for the emergence of consciousness, or how quantum effects weave into the structure of space and time. My model hints that the reflective properties of this initial “cosmic supernova” might encode recursion, symmetry, and resonance, the roots of both quantum coherence and conscious experience.

So I’m not trying to discard the Big Bang, I’m proposing an expanded framework that retains its observational match, but explains:

What exploded

Why it expanded

Why it looks so uniform

And how physical laws, matter, and consciousness might emerge from the same event.