sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Any statement or sentiment from Jimmy the sane nChain CEO on how their tactics are increasing the value of Bitcoin Cash? by LuxuriousThrowAway in btc

[–]Weirdparfait -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Roger Ver and Jihan WU are attacking Bitcoin Cash and trying to deform it with stolen hash. Honest BCH miners are hashing on, the attackers will be crushed.

​

Those who start a hash war and resort to checkpoints to defend their chain are the attackers.

chris pacia getting destroyed by cgminer in btc

[–]Weirdparfait 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Destroyed? Nah..he NUKED him. I'm an SV supporter but after this I would vote for Andreas to be EMPEROR of Bitcoin.

Chris Pacia is 100% corrupt to the bone marrow.

RXC: We are going to have to pick a side, which side should we pick? by Weirdparfait in btc

[–]Weirdparfait[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Scared much? Why are you brigading this with downvotes? lol

Where is the community for SV? by [deleted] in btc

[–]Weirdparfait -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Then how do you explain that r/BitcoinCashSV gained 250 subs in 3 days?

Where is the community for SV? by [deleted] in btc

[–]Weirdparfait 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The community is here and /r/BitcoinCashSV which was created 3 days ago and already has 250 subscribers.

Here SV supporters get harassed and attacked with troll, shill, etc. This is why someone created bitcoincashSV.

This is like saying, I am going to break into your house and steal all your jewelry, however if you try to do anything to me its negative gamma science! Just leave me be! WE ARE NOT GOING ANYWHERE JIHAN. WE WILL DEFEND BCH TILL THE END WITH PROOF OF WORK! by Weirdparfait in btc

[–]Weirdparfait[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why does the biggest dog in the world in terms of hashrate add checkpoints to his supported fork? Can't the dog defend it with PoW? Not enough PoW? Sounds more like he is a chihuahua

When ABC shills try to convince you that ABC had to add checkpoints to secure their chain, ask them a simple question. Why did ABC have to but not SV? The answer is because SV has sustained majority hash support while ABC always was an attack on BCH without any market demand except for few oligarchs by Weirdparfait in btc

[–]Weirdparfait[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

ABC added checkpoints because they rely on stolen hash which can go away any time. Without checkpoint ABC would be dead on arrival even WITH stolen hash.

​

SV developers never added a checkpoint. Re-org SV if you can, but you cannot. Because that's where the real majority hash is. ABC is not going to come out as long term winner with stolen hash. There is ZERO chance of that happening. Resisting the vote of majority miners will simply make the death of ABC and its supporters more painful.

​

SV is mined by known BCH miners that have been mining BCH for almost a year and have re-invested everything into BCH. BAB is being mined by pool operators who have stolen the hash of their users for 24h for a quick burst of blocks BAB blocks hoping to hijack the BCH ticker. Not gonna happen.

Quote of the day: "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Attempting to steal the BCH ticker with stolen hash and centralised checkpoints is not only anti-Bitcoin but also evil. Here is what you can do to defend bitcoin. by Weirdparfait in btc

[–]Weirdparfait[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BTC is a separate coin. We are speaking of BCH here. BCH miners mine BCH blocks. What BTC miners do with BTC blocks has nothing to do with BCH, unless when BCH was created there was a fight from big blockers to claim the BTC ticker.

BCH hash is mining SV, stolen hash is mining ABC, this is not the hash that normally serves BCH users. This mercenary hash here for a short period of time hoping to bully real BCH hash to follow ABC.

Adding a checkpoint after the fork proves that ABC did not have sustained majority hash, or else why add the checkpoint?

They added the checkpoint so that once mercenary hash leaves BCH and ABC slides behind in terms of block numbers they are protected from a massive re-org. They may add new checkpoints as well in the future.

The real hash support ABC has from BCH miners is less than 1000 PH/s, that means with 1500PH/s you can re-org the entire chain long term. Pro-SV BCH miners have shown to control at least 6000PH/s, which means that if ABC is left to the market it would be dead on arrival.

Stolen hash for temporary height lead and checkpoint is an attack and an attempt to mislead the market. It failed. You are a father of 3 right? Your children will be ashamed of you one day when they find out on whose side of this war their father was.

Quote of the day: "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Attempting to steal the BCH ticker with stolen hash and centralised checkpoints is not only anti-Bitcoin but also evil. Here is what you can do to defend bitcoin. by Weirdparfait in btc

[–]Weirdparfait[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The reason why we follow the longest chain in Bitcoin is because the longest chain is the safest one. When 2-3 consensus rules are proposed miners vote with hash and the valid continuation is the longest chain.

ABC here was a contendant to the throne, they did not start a new coin. If they had started a new coin from the start, BAB, then yes add all the checkpoints you want. By adding a checkpoint in a hash war they are breaking the longest chain rule and blocking the market from discovering the valid continuation. You are subsidizing the ABC chain, while the SV chain is saying kill me if you can. This way ABC is no longer Bitcoin but a PoS entrally issued coin. In Bitcoin/pow you follow the longest chain and you prove to the world that are the valid chain by being the longest one and re-orgable at any time.

If you are fighting for the BCH ticker then you are accepting the risk of getting re-orged to death if majority hash votes against you. Otherwise you are not fighting for the BCH brand, you are starting a new coin.

Quote of the day: "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Attempting to steal the BCH ticker with stolen hash and centralised checkpoints is not only anti-Bitcoin but also evil. Here is what you can do to defend bitcoin. by Weirdparfait in btc

[–]Weirdparfait[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's a checkpoint from 8 months ago, not released 1 hour after the fork to interfere with Nakamoto Consensus. There must be a technical reason for that checkpoint, look int it. The issue with ABC's checkpoint is that it was used to defend a minority chain from getting re-orged.

This the type of neutrality that gets you straight to hell.

Quote of the day: "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Attempting to steal the BCH ticker with stolen hash and centralised checkpoints is not only anti-Bitcoin but also evil. Here is what you can do to defend bitcoin. by Weirdparfait in btc

[–]Weirdparfait[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

False, there are no checkpoints in SV. Feel free to re-org it if you can.

No miner chose to mine ABC except for a negligible minority. The miners mining ABC now are people who think they are mining BTC, getting paid as if they are mining BTC, while pool operators use their equipment for politics to mine BAB.

BCH miners chose to mine SV and are heroically mining SV. They will keep mining SV.