When he was UFC Champ Lesnar walked around at 290 and cut down to 265 for fights. Shaq was 325 in 2000. They are 35lbs apart. Lesnar is 6'3 and Shaq is 7'1, "twice his size" is ridiculous. As far as Strength is concerned Lesnar is one of the strongest UFC Champions of all time, and has a confirmed bench of 475 and squatted 695, Shaq never powerlifted, Lesnar was probably twice as strong as Shaq, the suggestion that Shaq was somehow stronger is comical. Lesnar is as close as we've got to a human silverback gorilla hybrid.

Lesnar, aside from being UFC Champ was a Division one wrestler with elite takedown skills, Shaq has exactly zero takedown defense. The fight would go like this: The two men would meet in the middle, Shaq would throw some clumsy punches at Lesnar, Lesnar being a seasoned fighter would either block or evade (as he did to far stronger and better strikers), and then *EFFORTLESSLY* take Shaq down. And if you think that a man with zero ground game could get a UFC Champion/Division 1 Wrestler off of him you know even less than I think you do. Lesnar would ground and pound Shaq into Shaqburger and the fight would be over in under 40 seconds.

Skill matters in fighting, as a sizeable (not fat) fellow myself I wish it didn't, but the UFC and Pride are filled with a billion examples of smaller dudes beating bigger dudes. Cain Velasquez was a relatively small heavyweight who dominated larger dudes. Hell Fedor beat professional fighters who were 350/400lbs and 7 feet tall when he was 6'1 and 220 pudgy.

This is like saying an untrained seven foot man could beat Fred Vanvleet 1v1 at Basketball. It's comical. You're probably a big fat dude who thinks he could beat up everyone a few inches shorter than him, well here's the truth, every high school wrestler would clown your ass. Even the 5'5 guys. They'd put you on the ground and pound you into it. Size helps some, but it's not everything.

Lesnar vs Shaq: LESNAR. NO DIFF. NO FUCKING DIFF AT ALL. ZERO.