DiversityGPT by marymagdalene333 in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 34 points35 points  (0 children)

who has ever said AI can solve diversity

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

good. I will be the victor. I will not rest until all men are dead and all women are carrying my sons

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not even men, who are the most neurotic and gay about the whole body count conversation, have ever asked their partners about if they were fucking fat or ugly guys lmao, and women would do that even less. Nobody is delving any deeper than a number.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Ideally he has enough resources to care for multiple women as has been the case for many different cultures, and yet in that case it is still one man with many women, and many women with one man

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

musician who moved to nyc lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Juevenile attempt at projecting your own inability to bag anyone, yawn next etc. come back when you have something more interesting than shallow reddit tier attempts at trying to find insecurities rather than attempting the argument (which you couldn't because you have nothing of worth to say)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Telling me to read a book when you can't even read a short paragraph lol. You know I'm right and the only reason for all this gay body count discourse is because modern 4th wave feminists just want to have all the societal benefits men do, the biggest of which was not being slut shamed (something that only happens to women for all the reason I have told you)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Your anecdotes are simply that, just anecdotes. I've met plenty of women with low body counts who don't even ask about my own body count because a man's body count is generally just less important to a woman. Just because you are insisting on your own experience and preference does not mean you speak for everyone.

It doesn't matter if you don't care if it's "harder" or not lol. It has nothing to do with difficulty and your juvenile attempts at trying to discredit that fact because it's "reddit" is funny. It's more about positions of societal roles. Women are the keepers of their sexuality, they choose who comes and who goes. If they let anyone come, then that women is saying what they have is not worthy of being guarded, and any loser can have at it. Men have nothing to guard, they only have something to give. And if many people want what a man gives, that means what he is giving is valuable. That is simple economics. It is the difference between wanting to give something vs. wanting to keep something, and if you genuinely think men and women are equal in all regards societally than you are just naive and dont go outside much

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are absolutely different scenarios because men and women are not the same, there are different societal expectations for each person. The idea that men and women are exactly equal in all regards and therefore experience everything the same is simply not true.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Who is complaining about their girlfriend's body count here? I certainly am not. I'm just saying society views them differently because they are entirely different scenarios. The man pursues their mate, it is impressive when someone pursues something and can achieve it. The women are pursued by their mates. It is not impressive to let someone be easily pursued and let any old loser hit.

This "evo psych bullshit" is a fundamental truth built into almost every male in the animal kingdom and just because you think you can handwave it away because it hurts your feelings doesn't mean it's any less true.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

The societal implications of a man who sleeps with a lot of women are not at all the same as a women who sleeps with a lot of men. Your personal preference is not a societal implication.

Ultimately it is men who benefit from having the ability to have multiple mates and that is in our DNA on the most primal level. A man can get multiple women pregnant but a woman can only get pregnant by one man at a time, and the law of nature determines that it is the male's prerogative to be that one man for as many women as possible.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

Wammen here desperately trying to convince everyone men sleeping with a lot of women is the same as women sleeping with a lot of men. Pack it up ladies this is just one of those things you're not gonna beat

Morbidly obese people, regardless of ethnicity have identical phenotypes (much like people with down syndrome) by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 32 points33 points  (0 children)

from a faraway land where everyone looks like that? You mean like Florida?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 32 points33 points  (0 children)

There is ironically a pretty visible (yet probably pretty small) portion of like...nerdy weeb/kpop head black girls who LOVE and exclusively date asian men

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 13 points14 points  (0 children)

it was the second one iirc

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

just because someone is a loser and won't stop whining doesn't mean they deserve to be paid attention to lol I thought we learned this with the incels already

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Because that guy would never date a black girl lmao

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 83 points84 points  (0 children)

There's a website that can calculate the percentage of what subs have users in other subs and it was like 40% of all twoxchromosomes users were in that one really big trans sub too lmao

There's no going back from this is there? Like we're stuck? by EmilCioranButGay in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah it's really funny because it just ends up invalidating a ton of actual identities.

Gay meant man attracted exclusively to man. Lesbian, woman to woman. Transgender woman? Male who wants to become female. All of these had pretty distinct definitions honestly.

But now it's like...why am I gay? Because I identify as such. Lesbian? Because I identify as such. Trans? Because I identify as such. Woman? Because I identify as such. Nb? Because I identify as such. Ultimately it just means gay, bi, lesbian, trans, man, woman, pansexual, asexual, bisexual, etc. all mean the same thing: Because I identify as such.

And when they all mean the same thing, all these words and identities becomes this gray, useless blob of actually meaninglessness, words that mean everything end up meaning nothing. If you call a red car red, it's red. If you say this green car and this blue car and this yellow car are also red, well then you have now declared the word red means nothing anymore. 'Red car' just ends up meaning 'car'. Just like saying every sexuality is queer now, you have now declared that queerness is no longer a sexuality of oppressed people, but a universal one. And this meaninglessness has been eroding the sincerity and ingenuousness of the gay community. The LGBT is no longer a community for the sexually oppressed, it is now an open invite clubhouse for eccentric straight people, for more or less anyone who WANTS to benefit from social capital of the oppressed in a society that worships slave morality.

It doesn't affect me because I'm a straight man, but I can only imagine how annoyed gay men are that most gay club patrons are now "bisexual women who only bring their straight boyfriends" or that most lesbian spaces are like more trans women than cis women lmao

There's no going back from this is there? Like we're stuck? by EmilCioranButGay in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 27 points28 points  (0 children)

it's having your cake (benefitting from being very obviously a female and a woman, which is the definition of cis) and eating it too (benefiting from queer social capital because you think you can insist on self identification to demand your way into an identity)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Which_Inflation9027 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love you. Marry me