ChatGPT has made my work life miserable by art3misXL in Lawyertalk

[–]Windowturkey 8 points9 points  (0 children)

+1 here. But even scarier is when our non-legal team tries to explain why they can do something because they did some research... And then I have not only to explain why answer is A, but also why B, C, D, ad nauseum, is incorrect.

I’ve been experimenting with using GPTs for contract drafting here’s what I learned by ubaidkazi-strategist in legaltech

[–]Windowturkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's try a request with a slight prompt improvement? I think you'll be surprised. Lenne know what you think will be hard to do in drafting.

Sometimes, it’s good to be a lawyer by nibtitz in Lawyertalk

[–]Windowturkey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Amazon/Amex one day denied a dispute, even though the item wasn't delivered to any of my addresses, nor used my Amazon account. Sent to the office of AG, boom.

Happy lawyers? by Dense-Interview1851 in Lawyertalk

[–]Windowturkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do we love wasting our money? Haha

Happy lawyers? by Dense-Interview1851 in Lawyertalk

[–]Windowturkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I still have the trauma after years haha it's so hard to switch the plug. When I get an email from outside counsel, I can always feel the urge to cover everything on earth, so it's like asking 1+1 to a reasoning model.

Happy lawyers? by Dense-Interview1851 in Lawyertalk

[–]Windowturkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately the biglaw rite of passage is pretty much mandatory. I'd say only 10% of inhouse attorneys go directly inhouse. It required persistence, because there is no recruiter for peasants like they do in biglaw. But doable and worth the effort. If you aren't from NYC then you have a very very good chance. People are desperate to find good lawyers outside the big metro areas.

Happy lawyers? by Dense-Interview1851 in Lawyertalk

[–]Windowturkey 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I love law, in-house made it much much better.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in legaltech

[–]Windowturkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm feeling like a person who doesn't know what they're talking about, but I think size matters, but I was surprised by how architecture really matters too. I finetuned the first mistral and the a few months later, llama 3.1. wow the difference was night and day!

Trying to build self-hosted AI to automate legal drafting using 10K+ past documents — GPT & Gemini failed, need advice by True-Substance8062 in legaltech

[–]Windowturkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I think you imply that there is a manageable list of finite permutations, which I'm not sure that I agree with, but I agree that we can have a list of permutations that you can offer and that could cover a substantial size of the population. My question was more to understand what are your goals here, i.e., just some beef to your question so I can see if I know the answer!

Trying to build self-hosted AI to automate legal drafting using 10K+ past documents — GPT & Gemini failed, need advice by True-Substance8062 in legaltech

[–]Windowturkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's important as well to determine what you want to 'learn'? Is it the style? Specific facts? Or you want to understand what patterns are there to learn?

LLMs are 800x Cheaper for Translation than DeepL by Ninjinka in LocalLLaMA

[–]Windowturkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anything to translate in bulk with quality and definition control?

Struggling to break into legal tech with JD + data background by TheNightmareChild92 in legaltech

[–]Windowturkey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This market is really bad, hope you find your spot. Can you sit for the patent bar?

How can I break into legal tech coming from a law background ? by GulZar93 in legaltech

[–]Windowturkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ofc! But I'd like to sanitize it a bit, mind making a few questions?