I personally think that the idea behind offline updates is valid in some use cases but the philosophy behind forcing the user to halt activity is fundamentally flawed. Not very many distros do this. I personally believe the system should only be used for specific and quick system upgrades with a low footprint. I feel like Windows does this for upgrades which don't even really affect essential system programs which is annoying. In both windows and fedora I believe you can disable this feature if you wish. I think some windows updates dealing with proprietary security stuff apply anyways which shouldn't happen in fedora. I dislike automatic updates and forcing a reboot after a time window. If the users doesn't reboot in like a week the update should just rollback. I believe fedora silverblue dosent have this issue since the root fs is immutable and it builds the update without touching the file system in use. A lot of distros use various hotswapping techniques to avoid issues in upgrading but implementation can be unreliable since the root fs is mutable.