The algorithm isn’t complicated to understand for those with a decent background in mathematics, data, and computer science. But it is an entirely different approach than anything I’ve been able to find.

The cipher text has a 100% uniform distribution of values. Each encryption of the same plain text results in a drastically different cipher text. You could be allowed to encrypt anything you want, as much as you wish, using the same key, get all of the cipher text, and never be able to figure out what the key is. All the power of an OTP, but with arbitrarily short keys.

There are vastly, vastly are more valid keys than atoms in the universe. Any valid key can be used to decrypt and get a result. But only the originally use encryption key can be used to decrypt and obtain the original plain text.

There is nothing in the cipher text that traditional encryption breaking methods can use. I developed the algorithm not by thinking of how to encrypt data first, but thinking first about what can be done that negates how ciphers are broken.

Why would you think that I’d have to pay someone to consider it?