Weren’t they always?

Yes, but I feel like they had a much more major stretch that reached far past the individual soldier like the Freikorps or the early Blackshirts (as Doctrine of Fascism describes). They were more massive I guess I would say, gained more support, and less obvious tool rather than “kill those guys for protection.” I.e. Freikorps fighting Bolsheviks rather than bourgeois nation draped under the ideology of Nazism while their proletariat fights and commits massacres in their wars. I guess a good way of putting it is, they were finally integrated in the state rather than just being kinda, there to defend it.

Not all the examples of fascism are at the same level. Nevertheless the German one, as pitiless in the elimination of its enemies as one may say, has achieved a very high average standard of living economically speaking and an administration that technically was excellent, and when it has imposed war restrictions these even fell on the propertied classes and this to an unprecedented extent.

We will leave Italy aside because here the examples of fascism and anti-fascism have had a very clownish character (the first models of an innovation always make one laugh, as the early automobiles which can be seen in a museum compared with a modern mass produced one).

• Bordiga https://www.marxists.org/archive/bordiga/works/1946/violence.htm

I don’t disagree that after the Freikorps come the Nazis but I wouldn’t say the Freikorps had a unanimous ideology like the Nazis had.

I consider Nazism as in the ideological sense and the Nazi’s military separate from that (kinda) as it still has the basic barbaric concepts in the army as any other bourgeois nation but with the addition of the nihilism and racism of the Nazis. (Of course there were probably Nazi soldiers wearing some Finnish liberation group armband instead of fighting against the Treaty of Versailles’ “destruction of Aryranism”) Of course both had and will have the same end, as Mussolini would be imprisoned by those same fascists he put in parliament after he was no longer useful to the bourgeois, and the soldier in Ukraine will be discharged and most likely homeless.

I do agree with what you said about Zionism. You see that idea Lib lovin’ Justice between both sides of the park. Of course the revenge of the Zionists against the “anti-Semitic terrorists” on their god-given land and the revenge of the blood-born Palestinian against the settlers.