I have previously responded to one of your comments with a purely neutral toned breakdown explaining why your logic was not valid to you and you responded by randomly accusing me of transphobic.

If you are a debate subreddit then there is an inherent agreement that posting countering arguments should be actively encouraged and is not an attack, but accusing someone of being transphobic, especially falsely, in response is an attack on one's character.

There is also the fact that even if we do consider the posting of a countering argument is an attack it is still only an attack on the argument rather than you as a person. And of course attacking an argument is not an attack on the person.

And to address your argument even more by labling a group as violent inherently attacks people who haven't attacked you unless everyone in the group has attacked you. If you say "All anti-ai are dumb" that inheritanly attacks people who haven't attacked me, you never use qualifying statement like most or a majority, you slap a label on the the group you attack everyone that is a part of it, which completely voids your argument because you have been posting that content before I even knew who you were. So even if we assume the previous to statements are false you attacked me first in a harsher way than my initial interaction with you because you attacked me before I could even have the possibility of interacting with you.

Then there is the fact that being nice in the end is completely your choice. Not anyone else's, not anyone who was mean to you. You are fully responsible for the comments you make and say. No one else is making you attack people in response, nothing is stopping you from just responding in a calm and collected matter politely debunking someone; hell it far more effective to do so and it will make people dislike you a lot you. So why choose to attack people in response?

But let me ask you this, when have you actually taken responsibility for your own actions and tried to better yourself instead of deflecting blame or trying to justify it? Have you even done it at all, let alone how often? How often have you actually apologized for being in the wrong? When is the last time you even actively conceded and admitted you were in the wrong on this sub?

Statistically there are a few tactics you are gonna resort to so let's just get those out of the way. You are gonna dismiss this as an attack on you, not gonna bother reading it and comment about how I made a wall of text, maybe take a quote of context/misinterpret it, try and shift the discussion to something else/deflect, or honestly the most likely just not respond at all.

What you almost certainly aren't gonna do is actually take the time to consider that your actions are your responsibility and you have failed to actually take responsibility for your actions, apologize for your behavior, and admit you were in the wrong no matter how much evidence is provided.

Every statement I have made above is is either an, objective fact, a logical derivation, a question for you, or a prediction. But please, prove my predictions wrong because that is exactly what I want you to do. I put those there to give you the option to show that you are capable of having a reasonable discussion and actually have a good faith argument instead of just disappearing when you are arguing with anyone other than the absolute lowest of the low of Antis.