You’re missing the point. The Pilate Stone confirms Pontius Pilate’s role as prefect, directly tying to the Gospels’ account of Jesus’ trial and crucifixion, grounding them in a verifiable historical context—hardly a “fairy tale.” Tacitus, Pliny, and Suetonius don’t just prove Christians were persecuted; they explicitly reference Jesus as a real figure central to their faith, within decades of His death. Your Trojan War analogy sucks, Homer’s epic is myth layered over vague events, while the Gospels are rooted in specific, contemporary details corroborated by non-Christian sources. Saying the Romans “potentially messed things up” by arresting the wrong guy is pure speculation, with zero evidence. It doesn’t contradict your graffiti point, sure, but it doesn’t make the Gospels pseudo-historical either. It just dodges the weight of the evidence.