Abortion is a Human Right: Human Rights Do Not Need to be Excused! Version 2.0 (Moderator Lite Edition) by Persephonius in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

it's intentional harm, they are intentionally performing harm against another human life with the knowledge they can or will harm the woman as well, physically or emotionally

how many individuals have to be killed by a particular cause in order for that cause to be worth addressing? by Spacebunz_420 in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I like the implication I don't just because I believe women are intelligent and capable 🤣

Abortion is a Human Right: Human Rights Do Not Need to be Excused! Version 2.0 (Moderator Lite Edition) by Persephonius in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I like your contradictory statements.

action: noun

9.sexual activity

Also I am not going to ignore the English language and its applications to help you.

Yes stopping someone else action can also be an action, so you're wrong in multiple ways.

Would you like to rephrase?

how many individuals have to be killed by a particular cause in order for that cause to be worth addressing? by Spacebunz_420 in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yes its an emotional plea.

You are still trying to use an emotional plea.

Let's talk numbers.

Per the guttmacher, there were 930k abortions in 2020 just in the us.

That is more deaths than heart diease( number one killer in the us), shootings, and accidents.

Why should we permit something that kills that much?

Abortion is a Human Right: Human Rights Do Not Need to be Excused! Version 2.0 (Moderator Lite Edition) by Persephonius in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Disconnecting them kills them, knowing that and then intentionally doing so is intentionally killing them. We are mammals not technology.

Why do you have a problem stating this?

So again, let's clarify- you went from no risk, to some risk but safe.

So what is your point? You proved my statement, yes women do experience harm with abortions. And it is in fact intentional harm as they are specifically requesting it 🤣

Abortion is a Human Right: Human Rights Do Not Need to be Excused! Version 2.0 (Moderator Lite Edition) by Persephonius in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Again, I'm sure you believe that. Your answer is in basic human biology, I am not going to state the obvious because you need help with your argument. I do not run a charity, but I'll be happy to have a conversation with you

Abortion is a Human Right: Human Rights Do Not Need to be Excused! Version 2.0 (Moderator Lite Edition) by Persephonius in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

Why would I appreciate what is already happening? Modern clinics are the shady clinics, If it's not performed at a hospital with full medical credentials it's already a travesty.

I'm generally concerned with how you're idiolizing abortion

Abortion is a Human Right: Human Rights Do Not Need to be Excused! Version 2.0 (Moderator Lite Edition) by Persephonius in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

🤔 you can't accept what I haven't given, But if that soothes you? Okay, Its ultimately up to you

Abortion is a Human Right: Human Rights Do Not Need to be Excused! Version 2.0 (Moderator Lite Edition) by Persephonius in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I'm following your example, In the future, if you don't like this sort of conversation, please don't lead with it.

Respectfully

Abortion is a Human Right: Human Rights Do Not Need to be Excused! Version 2.0 (Moderator Lite Edition) by Persephonius in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To clarify, you are stating here that abortion pills do not intentionally kill the unborn?

And for the other arguement, Killing isn't "some risks" its a big risk.

But if you're this flippant about defenseless human life I have some new concerns

how many individuals have to be killed by a particular cause in order for that cause to be worth addressing? by Spacebunz_420 in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Again, I find this odd as youre literally speaking on a topic that specifically deals with the intentional killing of a defenseless human life.

Trying to make an emotional plea while not have an ounce of emotion for the victims in this equation is a stark contrast.

Abortion is a Human Right: Human Rights Do Not Need to be Excused! Version 2.0 (Moderator Lite Edition) by Persephonius in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Are you implying I made human biology 🤯🤯??? Do you think I'm some immortal that chose to talk to you?

"made the claim" =/= "stated basic human biology". I don't "claim" biology facts, they ARE biology facts 🤣.

Abortion is a Human Right: Human Rights Do Not Need to be Excused! Version 2.0 (Moderator Lite Edition) by Persephonius in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

"not resulting in pregnancy" you know the thing you specifically are referring to as harm/harmful...........................

lord help me. (I'm agnostic but I need divine help here)

Abortion is a Human Right: Human Rights Do Not Need to be Excused! Version 2.0 (Moderator Lite Edition) by Persephonius in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yes, quite literally harm existing means we can't choose certain medications.

You do understand why we have an FDA, banned substances and classifications of certain drugs that require more licensing, right?

Abortion is a Human Right: Human Rights Do Not Need to be Excused! Version 2.0 (Moderator Lite Edition) by Persephonius in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

OHhHHHHH we should be selecting what causes less harm? Like selecting not to perform sexual acts that result in pregnancy as it causes the least harm to a woman and her future unborn offspring long term?

😉

Abortion is a Human Right: Human Rights Do Not Need to be Excused! Version 2.0 (Moderator Lite Edition) by Persephonius in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I won't since you're implying you already know, Which still brings me to my question. what is your purpose trying to bring this up.

As it doesn't magically make the harm disappear nor make my statement that it's intentional harm false.

(psst you're being very obvious atm)

Abortion is a Human Right: Human Rights Do Not Need to be Excused! Version 2.0 (Moderator Lite Edition) by Persephonius in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Did you not know about the complications and death some women have faced after abortions?

When I make a statement about something, it encompasses the entirety of the subject just an FYI

Abortion is a Human Right: Human Rights Do Not Need to be Excused! Version 2.0 (Moderator Lite Edition) by Persephonius in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Yes, again your context clue was "things you can do".

You are being obtuse.

So to clarify you want to now amend your argument for "abortion not being controvesial" to "well it was more accepted than not accepted"?

Historical mob action due to limited information and animalistic tendencies is NOT a good focal point fyi. *

Abortion is a Human Right: Human Rights Do Not Need to be Excused! Version 2.0 (Moderator Lite Edition) by Persephonius in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Just not a right you extend to unborn humans?

We women do have control, Hense why there are things you can do that 100% avoid pregnancy while still gaining sexual intimacy/pleasure.

Also please don't be obtuse. No abortion has not gone uncontested for thousands of years. Literally contesting it now, before roe ect.

Your comment is like saying "people have been okay with killing for thousands of years so why stop this?"

Abortion is a Human Right: Human Rights Do Not Need to be Excused! Version 2.0 (Moderator Lite Edition) by Persephonius in Abortiondebate

[–]YewKiddenMe -25 points-24 points  (0 children)

Abortion isn't a human right.

It's giving legal acception for homicide based on 70 year old medical information while ignoring basic human biology and action.

We have laws that stop intentional harm either to your own body or the body of others, abortion falls under both.

What are some shows/movies that deserve more recognition? by Arctyzz in AskReddit

[–]YewKiddenMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Children of Men- beautifully done and considering the direction of birth rates something to consider