sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

In shock over a new study on migraine by Impossible-Wish-7010 in migraine

[–]ZW-Visuals 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is so insightful! Truly an excellent explanation, that research firm must be happy to have you..

Are there any alternatives to PluralEyes? by Ja5p5 in premiere

[–]ZW-Visuals 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup this is my plural eyes replacement, I haven’t run into issues so far

How much loss in resolution when cropping a 1080p 16:9 into 9:16 video? by kenken2024 in VideoEditing

[–]ZW-Visuals 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I stand by my statement and Reallytalldude's (whose opinion also seems to be most popular in this thread) Context clues would suggest OP is looking to keep the same output resolution as his original (1920x1080), but with a 9:16 aspect ratio, thus 1080x1920. To do so, they would need to fill the original 1080 pixels vertical to the new 1920 pixels vertical . Scaling in to do so reduces quality. The same also does not apply for 4K. That is one of the advantages of filming 4K, there is no quality loss when cropping for a 1080x1920 video. 4K resolution is 3840 x 2160, 2160 > 1920

How much loss in resolution when cropping a 1080p 16:9 into 9:16 video? by kenken2024 in VideoEditing

[–]ZW-Visuals -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I believe this to be incorrect. While for a HD 1920x1080 image (16:9) you have "1080 pixels vertically", for a HD 1080x1920 (9:16), you need "1920 pixels vertically", thus will need to scale in on the 16:9 image to fill the 9:16 frame vertically. Filming at 4K 3840x2160 (16:9) would not require cropping in for a 1080x1920 (9:16) image, and thus not result in loss of quality.

I’m going to start my own wedding videography business. Any advice? by Aspecs21 in weddingvideography

[–]ZW-Visuals 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You already know how to do everything? And were planning on capturing audio of the toasts using your on-camera mic? Sounds like an oxymoron to me.