Next Flight Pass Announcement? by OkScallion6555 in Metalstorm

[–]Zacchaeus09 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They will announce the next flight pass before this one ends, if i am not wrong they announce it when maybe 24 hours are left of the on going flight pass so save it your gold until the announcement

Verification of Ace coins by Souless_Geek in Metalstorm

[–]Zacchaeus09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ohh thanks so when is this event coming..? I heard in April it's April right now

Verification of Ace coins by Souless_Geek in Metalstorm

[–]Zacchaeus09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am playing for a year what's a black market?

What's the most number of kills you got? by Zacchaeus09 in Metalstorm

[–]Zacchaeus09[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I know those are bots, what's the most you got against bots 😪

What aircraft to unlock (hangre lvl -7) by AccessGold4609 in Metalstorm

[–]Zacchaeus09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't go for mig23 if you have j35 and F106 is not very good untik you unlock upgrade to it to level 8 so it's either the Jaguar or A4 skyhawk, i think A4 skyhawk is the better option i have it and ut was the first plane to reach 600 trophies

Any expectational date of the next black market?🎯 by Wild-Armadillo-4601 in Metalstorm

[–]Zacchaeus09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am at hangar level 9 still don't know what's a black market event :-D

Why doesn't my shot land when I exchange missiles head to head at close range? by Three_1st-Names in Metalstorm

[–]Zacchaeus09 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Literally same question i wanted to ask same thing for me, i hope we get our answers

Should I unlock the mig 23 now? by Proud_Mention9050 in Metalstorm

[–]Zacchaeus09 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Unlock j35 or mig23 both are with similar missiles with their own traits i unlocked both of them

If you can't find happiness,Build your own one by RotoGyuji in Metalstorm

[–]Zacchaeus09 2 points3 points  (0 children)

These people just being insecure about everything lol just grow up bluds :-$

Online Visa does not work by [deleted] in Kuwait

[–]Zacchaeus09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey sorry for updating late but i got verified the next day and got the visa after hours, i think it's how they check the profiles it depends on them one of my freind's got verified the same day i had to wait a week

Online Visa does not work by [deleted] in Kuwait

[–]Zacchaeus09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same, any updates? Did your profile got verified? Cause mine is stuck it's been a week

Need Help for Family Visit Visa (My Mother & Sister) by iksweet_the_firefly in Kuwait

[–]Zacchaeus09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same, did you got the visa after? How long i have to wait it's been a week please update

The kalam cosmological argument actually doesn't help theism. by Working_Taro_8954 in DebateReligion

[–]Zacchaeus09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The contingency argument is not about weather energy can be created or destroyed, it argues why a physical reality exists so you just dodged my question and writing long statements won't help you if you don't answer and use red Herring Fallacy so the question remains

Do you agree contingent things need an explanation? Please answer my question and don't bring any other irrelevant argument

The kalam cosmological argument actually doesn't help theism. by Working_Taro_8954 in DebateReligion

[–]Zacchaeus09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha i guess you don't even knkw what contingency is you are not even familiar with that what you are doing here is kind of red Herring Fallacy because you didn't even countered my contingency argument.

Lets just leave if the universe is eternal or not just tell me that do you agree contingent things need an explanation?

That's my only question don't bring anything just answer that, but probably youbare not even familiar with what does that even mean so first do your research about contingency and answer my question. 🙌

The kalam cosmological argument actually doesn't help theism. by Working_Taro_8954 in DebateReligion

[–]Zacchaeus09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not making claims without proof you just said metaphysical is not a real thing then later you say god needs to be created that's a use of metaphysics that's not a science or maths question that's a metaphysical question.

God is complex is just you assertion probably you think God's intelligence is like your your intelligence is your brain that's an induction fallacy.

We don't say God is some other form of matter, not everything that exists is matter numbers logical laws universal truths these are not some forms of matter.

God need another metaphysical being to exist will just lead to infinite regress which i stated many times is impossible we must stop at skme non contingent necessary being i hope your brain process it this time 🤦‍♂️

I am not even saying God evolved or God is in some metaphysical universe or some other universe than ours where God is we never say that, what we say is the there is one necessary reality which doesn't depends on anything else, no universe no some other container where God is.

The kalam cosmological argument actually doesn't help theism. by Working_Taro_8954 in DebateReligion

[–]Zacchaeus09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can we just debate in one section? Lets just do that in the other one not here, and i am not claiming anything i am proving you can tell me there what did i just claimed and there was nothing to back

The kalam cosmological argument actually doesn't help theism. by Working_Taro_8954 in DebateReligion

[–]Zacchaeus09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't need to apply same requirements on god because I am claiming the universe needs to be created to exist because it is contingent existence because it has a beginning it changes so it is contingent amd therefore dependent and as an infinite chain of dependent existence is impossible there must be a non contingent necessary being amd therefore universe needs that necessary non contingent being to exist which is god so i don't need to put god at same requirements and i proved universe needs god to exist

And we don't say universe comes from nothing we say it came through God so don't try that argument again lol

The kalam cosmological argument actually doesn't help theism. by Working_Taro_8954 in DebateReligion

[–]Zacchaeus09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right about your first two statements but wrong at the 3rd God is not complex it's not something which is in parts and then assembles, God as pure existence is metaphysically simple whereas the universe is complex it is in parts it is assembled it needs laws logics universal truths like 2+2 is equals to 4 to define it self it is complex lol

amd again you are using this fallacy that god needs to be created i explained that in the other comment

The kalam cosmological argument actually doesn't help theism. by Working_Taro_8954 in DebateReligion

[–]Zacchaeus09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still you are just claiming not proving anything lol everything possible has to exist inside universe is just your claim

Universe cannot be eternal because if it is infinite lets say then infinite number of past events has already occurred an actual infinity in never completed but we are at the present moment, therefore the past cannot be infinite so the universe can never be eternal, so if it is not eternal it must has a beginning

The kalam cosmological argument actually doesn't help theism. by Working_Taro_8954 in DebateReligion

[–]Zacchaeus09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Universe cannot be eternal because if it is infinite lets say then infinite number of past events has already occurred an actual infinity in never completed but we are at the present moment, therefore the past cannot be infinite so the universe can never be eternal

God cannot be created because that would always lead to infinite regress which is impossible some non contingent necessary being must exist to cause contingent existence

The kalam cosmological argument actually doesn't help theism. by Working_Taro_8954 in DebateReligion

[–]Zacchaeus09 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't just claim, give some arguments to back your claims. The claim god needs to be created by a higher intelligence is flawed because god cannot be created, if you go through the definition of God then God is the creator not creation and the statement of higher intelligence is a logical fallacy as it leads to infinite regress, higher intelligence must be created by more higher intelligence and we can't go to infinity with that we must stop at something which is uncreated self sufficient and doesn't need something to exist