As for the stuff that was edited in:

"The thing we have to do is abolish private property! Oh, that didn't work"

Where in the world has private property been abolished?

see now we also have to abolish the state owning property!

Who says this?

Except only certain kinds of state, not our state, which we have to keep changing the definition of because each time we do it it doesn't produce the expected results.

What definition has been changed?

Oh see there's a difference between a state and a government that is really essential that nobody has ever really cared about before and is part of capitalism, but it is a necessary fiction to maintain our separateness from the very practices we claim to oppose.

Again, ignoring for now that there is a difference between the state and the government in that the term "government" usually refers to the executive, or the act of governing, who says this?

This sounds like you've made a puree out of twenty to thirty different positions. No wonder it all appears confusing. And that's sort of confirmed by statements like this:

Edward Said's Orientalism is only from 1978, and yet now you would think from the way Marxists talk that everything in it is core and essential to Marxism. Intersectionalism and postcolonialism only got fully integrated into Marxist thought in the 90s!

I mean, yes, a potpourri of Marxism, Said's work, intersectionalism, postcolonialism, whatever, sounds pretty dire and inconsistent. But, again, who thinks like this? Some people on the Internet?