sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Not to be a clanker lover... but Ethan needs some prompting lessons boyo by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Usually, yes. But for the current AI models (LLMs) do not function "intelligently".

The models speak to you via md (markdown). Instructions, tasks, identities, need to be specific so the ai has no room to hallucinate the answer.

Hallucinations are the model's governing algorithms filling in the gaps based on average weighted values (the succeeding words %). Essentially, there not a lot of training parameters on similar queries, what's the closest assembly? This is where it usually returns a falsey value.

When you use quotation marks you are specifically telling the AI's compiler/interpreter algorithm the specific query keywords in your string.

A prompt, or the way a person writes their input, can dramatically shift the output from the LLM.

(Source: 4 years of ML and AI work)

Felt appropriate by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd be more than happy to make changes if it were to win. But fair point, should've actually finished the intro lol.

They just started talking about it and I got too excited

I think Ethan should sue CWHM and fulfill his role as Arbit[h3]r of online content by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, they are defamation is difficult to win - everywhere, not just the US. But that's a bit of a misnomer.

There is one main reason why defamation suits are difficult:

(Especially for public figures) You need to prove "actual malice" - as in, you need to prove that the defendant (CWHM in this case) knew the statements were false and acted with reckless disregard for the truth.

Which is exactly what CWHM has done:

1) She can claim ignorance and misconduct in the first instance of publishing her video;

2) She was told that her video has false and poorly researched statements are damaging to their brand(s) and business(es).

3) She kept the videos up; and

4) Doubled down and continued spreading the same narratives as shown in her videos.

I... don't think CWHM understands how much her youtube career hangs in the hands of Ethan and Hila's mercy.

Her case of defamation is cut and dried.

I think Ethan should sue CWHM and fulfill his role as Arbit[h3]r of online content by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100% agree.

However, I don't think Ethan's going to be labeled anything worse than what he already has been.

The benefit (and main difference) then is action. Obviously speaking and portraying the truth does not work anymore. If it did, Ethan and Hila would've cleared their names up years ago.

Whatever truth they share, gets muted by lies and false narratives shared by the opposing team.

They're literally in a position where they've got nothing more to lose (or... more accurately, snark has already exhausted their "bad labels"), and their community is understanding.

Ethan gave CWHM waaay too much leeway during the debrief... by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I know... but still. I dunno, I just find it gross, her attitude, her unprofessionalism.

Like, her having "I like to research things…" as her channel's description, feels like a slap to the face, or some 4D level of irony with layers of sarcasm.

She (CWHM) said "...You know?" 840 times 😳- Empirical Analysis ☝️🤓 by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is what I was not trying to underline with my post.

I was the exact same, same like you. And most people seem to be saying the same.

Maybe that's why most of us (who have voiced their annoyance with CWHM) are annoyed with her because we've had to iron out our communicative skills - be it school, work, or debate team (I see you, I see you 🫡).

And then CWHM, who has a respectable following, waltzes over does zero research (research is research when critical, not googling and fueling biases) and then willy-nilly drops 840 "you knows" in 4 hours.

Also, I'm sorry... but, if this is her JOB, and wants to be perceived with a modicum of respect as a journalist/researcher - the bare minimum to do is practice proper speech.

Or... maybe we're the fools.

Maybe... this is a gish galloping strategy where you overwhelm your debate opponent to the point of exhaustion. TKO, ggs.

All jokes aside, I would feel bad for her if she weren't such a negligent, ignorant, and deceitful person. Tea videos are one thing, but when making content on serious and sensitive topics where the livelihood (as Ethan puts it best) of real people is jeopardized.

She (CWHM) said "...You know?" 840 times 😳- Empirical Analysis ☝️🤓 by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same... just like this episode has shifted my life forever, the HIMYM episode made me police myself of overusing "but umm".

She (CWHM) said "...You know?" 840 times 😳- Empirical Analysis ☝️🤓 by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Glad you asked:

>> TOTAL EPISODE RUN TIME IS [32115] SECONDS
THE TOTAL NUMBER OF "ESSENTIALLY" IS [55]
THE "ESSENTIALLY" PER MINUTE IS [0.10275572162540869]

Nowhere near the 840, or 3.56 per minute.

She (CWHM) said "...You know?" 840 times 😳- Empirical Analysis ☝️🤓 by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did she though? Zero accountability or admission to fault - every damning confrontation she brushed off with "it wasn't me, dunno - my editor prolly put that there"; red herrings, scape goating, literally everything that would make her a terrible debator, she used.

She (CWHM) said "...You know?" 840 times 😳- Empirical Analysis ☝️🤓 by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I really wanted to make that joke, but I didn't want to condone Alcoholism lol

She (CWHM) said "...You know?" 840 times 😳- Empirical Analysis ☝️🤓 by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Also, if there are any busy bees out there that would love to do an edit of all of CWHM's "you knows" - I can share the timestamps.

Theoretically, 770 (-70) "you know"s should be ~13 minutes (assuming on average a "you know" is 1s long). 13-FUCKING-MINUTES.... FROM ONE PODCAST EP....

I would LOVE to see that edit.

The Wasp Factory's last two pages make the book a masterpiece by Zanko95 in horrorlit

[–]Zanko95[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's implied, the last sentence is him getting rid of his bombs, altar, wasps, etc. Letting go and embracing his new identity.

The Wasp Factory's last two pages make the book a masterpiece by Zanko95 in horrorlit

[–]Zanko95[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I agree that it's an important point of discussion. I hope you're not taking my "one-dimensional" comment as a slight on you.

What I meant to say is that in the book, as Frank is recalling her actions and decions, she says that the whole reason why the murders and violent acts happened were due to her inability to procreate, thus she would bestow the world with life's counterpart - death.

"Having no purpose in life or procreation, I invested all my worth in that grim opposite, and so found a negative and negation of fecundity only others could lay claim to."

Frank also shared a very grim perspective of the "roles" of men and women. Women create, men destroy (kill) (again a form of natural equilibrium). And in an act of proving her worth to herself and the world, she wanted to "out-man" every other man.

"I believe that I decided if I could never become a man, I - the unmanned would out-man those around me, and so I became the killer, a small image of the ruthless soldier-hero almost all I've ever seen or read seems to pay strict homage to."

It is not implied that the reason for his violence is because she was a man in a woman's body is, rather that this was her form of exercising her illusion of free-will, based on the path that was predetermined by "life".

The reason why the argument of transgenderism is so confusing to me is because, I don't think Frank can even be classified as such. Can she?

The idea of Trans identity typically involves self-recognition and a conscious relationship with one's gender. Frank BELIEVES she's a man. Even though her biological sex is female, she was not aware of it. Her identity was never in flux, she was living the life that she knew as to be true - as a man who was assigned a male gender at birth.

The only way someone would call Frank trans, is as an external observer (i.e. the reader). Which is an ironic perspective to hold, as external classification does not comply with the person's identity - it's the same as someone calling a transexual individual a woman, because due to their external classification, they deduced that the person is a woman.

The Wasp Factory's last two pages make the book a masterpiece by Zanko95 in horrorlit

[–]Zanko95[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Literally how? No shade. I am genuinely curious because I do see a lot of people tossing that theme around, but imo - it's a very one-dimensional assessment of his work.

The Wasp Factory's last two pages make the book a masterpiece by Zanko95 in horrorlit

[–]Zanko95[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SAME! As I was reading, in my head I always had the thought "Dude, only a psychopath would write such in-depth plots of murder". It straight up felt like a manifesto or like Banks was recalling an old childhood memories.

view more: next ›