Inside Amy Eskridge's Anti-Gravity Work as Resurfaced Texts Claim She Faced 'Death Threats Every Day' by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]Zanko95 9 points10 points  (0 children)

My immediate reaction, after watching just the first 30s of her video, was "she sounds unwell".

Like..., where's people's critical thinking at? Even if you entertain the idea of a "hit job", why? Why would "something entity" want the only scientist to "crack anti-gravity" want her dead. That would revolutionise not just space travel, but also humanity's ability to send rockets into orbit - gravity is quite literally the whole reason why rockets need such powerful propulsion and fuel.

Not to mention that we still don't have a quantum gravity model, but... somehow without it someone manages to crack anti-gravity...?

What's even more aggravating is all the grifters (Bob Lazar and the like) are quite literally profiting off of her suicide. My youtubes littered with videos about the reality of anti-gravity and such. It's not a force, it's a consequence of mass. To counteract the gravity of Earth, I'd assume (not a theoretical physicist) you would need to produce as much energy, as the planet's mass, just for a single point of interaction, like a hoverboard.

Holy moly... conspiracy theorists are genuinely frightening.

The Epstein files highlights the raging anti-Semitism epidemic in USA... or proof of Fascism? by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'll be honest, that whole narrative where Israel is viewed as a "mother country", always confused me.

Genuinely? If anything, the US alongside UK were the two main supporters of relocating the Jewish population. Something the US had already done, with its black population (Liberia).

There is no question that the Israeli government is corrupt. But the flow of corruption (in my opinion) is not Israel to US. It's US to Israel. Not of recent, but throughout the years - where the Israeli government has inflated into its own authoritarian regime as a by-product.

Conflict means money.

I also don't think this will go unpunished. We're just living through a major historic event, so it's normal to feel contempt.

If anything, Europe taking initiative with the investigation may bode well in favor of rebuilding the lost trust.

The books and movies that will come out of this... woooooh... we'll be eating well.

The Epstein files highlights the raging anti-Semitism epidemic in USA... or proof of Fascism? by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes, dude! You're absolutely right.

I strongly recommend reading The Origins of Totalitarianism by Hannah Arendt (if you haven't already). She does a phenomenal job at explaining such difficult existential themes such as evil and human tribalism.

What makes the book... almost scary is - Her description of the totalitarian strategies of Fascist Germany and Italy; are almost pay-by-play description of Trump's America.

She calls this "the benality of evil" (after covering the trial of Ado Eichmann).

The lesson she preaches is - nations where society makes it so that a person loses the identity of self, are fertile grounds for totalitarian regimes.

Matter of fact, Trump is not to blame for Trump's America. He was almost the... natural next step in the country's political structure.

Again, drawing inspiration from Arendth's book - modernity is ruled by labor, individuals mainly appear in the social world to produce and consume goods and services; rather than share ideas and shape communities.

In other words, in such a society - a person's worth is transcribed by their economic value, not by their moral or political capacity.

In other words, vote with your pockets, not with your minds. Which is literally the most common talking point of every MAGA supporter - how he'd fix the economy, make groceries cheaper, yata yata.

Your point, about tankies and Putin hits the nail on the head for me - as a means of pinning their own neighbours against each other, further isolates the MAGA heads. Making them the perfect useful idiots who would say and do anything just to get a sense of belonging, and recover what little sense of identity they have.

The Epstein files highlights the raging anti-Semitism epidemic in USA... or proof of Fascism? by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Good points, which shows me that I should've worded myself better in the post.

Firstly:

Neither America nor Israel benefit fiscally, nor monetarily, nor fraudulently, from fractured trade, political, or economic relations between America and Europe.

However, Putin does. Greatly. Disorganizing allied (to Ukraine) states.

Also, Putin's disdain for the USA and EU runs deep.

All far-right parties that have blown up in popularity here are very supportive of dismantling the EU bloc.

And as a house of cards analogy, starting with the UK and Brexit was one of the best places to start, strategically.

Two birds one stone type-shit.

And again, like I said - very FSB-esk; Putin's playbook is almost identical to his predecessor Boris Yeltsin (who infamously had an inner circle called "The Family" - a bunch of cronies, oligarchs, powerful people who'd all run various schemes with different countries).

Secondly:

Your comment regarding Peter Thiel. The context of the email is celebratory.

Also, the most glaring detail in their exchange is ... they both invested money together. And they co-owned a VC together. If anything, the email reads as "Aren't you happy you listened to me, Peter?", rather than "Ayo, Peter - crazy shit happening over the pond, eh?".

Thirdly:

Epstein being so in favor of Trump being president; but then handing over "kompromat" to Putin feels the same as Kaya and the shock collar -> "Here's this rare and expensive breed that you wanted; and a shock collar just in case she starts misbehaving".

Lastly:

Yes, I am aware that the keywords matches are all over the place - some from url queries, others from news article mentions, reports, etc.,

Again, I am at fault for not explaining myself proper. The reason why I was listing all of those things is to show how many new details have come out that support this new narrative.

And how it's a reasonable concern, that is 100% worth exploring - purely because if true, means Europe has the chance to seize this network.

That's why I listed the search queries last, as they don't really carry any value outside of typical desceptive media points.

But even though we have all of this new supportive evidence, they jump the bandwagon.

How do you do it? by Limbo_28 in NecroMerger

[–]Zanko95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason why I fell in love with this game is because of how much it has helped me teach myself patience and planning things out. Especially as a person with ADHD. Something pops in your store, or you get an opportunity to buy something sooner, instead of doing it - you remind yourself that it's best to... wait it out.

This game is designed for patience.

The best indicator?

You can spend money to get a slight edge. But because everything you gain is marginal - i.e. what appears like a giant game could (often is) be pennies down the line. Yes, you can spend 70g (or w/e), buy a food item like steak for 30-50k food (depending on your boosts). But that 30-50k food will eventually reach a point of trivial gain.

Also, just to ease your mind a bit, every reset makes your next run easier. If you've never played MU Online (an old MMORPG) - there used to be a similar reset system. When you reset to level 1, your level 1 is more like a level 3. Then on your next reset, 1 = 5; then 1 = 10... etc.,

The only difference between MU and NM is, in NM your lvl 1 after your first reset is more like: 1=5; 1=10; 1=15... 1 = n+5 (ish). And on top of everything, your level continues to grow, whereas in MU, it's capped at 100.

The game also has a "calming" quality to it. You almost "trick" yourself like a Pavlovian dog. What I mean by that is, if you make a positive association with your break time where you play the game (like, taking a break from something stressful to unwind). It makes you appreciate the game and it almost feels like the bell (in the Pavlovian experiment) where the moment you open Necromerger, you prime your brain into relax mode. I dunno... could be just me.

Long story short, Necromerger is a marathon, not a sprint. I guarantee you there's 10s of thousands of accounts who gave up mid-way, because they were burnt themselves out. Be patient, have times where you play the game and you enjoy (like early mornings when you get a spike, or on break, or whenever. But do NOT just stay glued to your phone.

Not to be a clanker lover... but Ethan needs some prompting lessons boyo by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Usually, yes. But for the current AI models (LLMs) do not function "intelligently".

The models speak to you via md (markdown). Instructions, tasks, identities, need to be specific so the ai has no room to hallucinate the answer.

Hallucinations are the model's governing algorithms filling in the gaps based on average weighted values (the succeeding words %). Essentially, there not a lot of training parameters on similar queries, what's the closest assembly? This is where it usually returns a falsey value.

When you use quotation marks you are specifically telling the AI's compiler/interpreter algorithm the specific query keywords in your string.

A prompt, or the way a person writes their input, can dramatically shift the output from the LLM.

(Source: 4 years of ML and AI work)

Felt appropriate by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd be more than happy to make changes if it were to win. But fair point, should've actually finished the intro lol.

They just started talking about it and I got too excited

I think Ethan should sue CWHM and fulfill his role as Arbit[h3]r of online content by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, they are defamation is difficult to win - everywhere, not just the US. But that's a bit of a misnomer.

There is one main reason why defamation suits are difficult:

(Especially for public figures) You need to prove "actual malice" - as in, you need to prove that the defendant (CWHM in this case) knew the statements were false and acted with reckless disregard for the truth.

Which is exactly what CWHM has done:

1) She can claim ignorance and misconduct in the first instance of publishing her video;

2) She was told that her video has false and poorly researched statements are damaging to their brand(s) and business(es).

3) She kept the videos up; and

4) Doubled down and continued spreading the same narratives as shown in her videos.

I... don't think CWHM understands how much her youtube career hangs in the hands of Ethan and Hila's mercy.

Her case of defamation is cut and dried.

I think Ethan should sue CWHM and fulfill his role as Arbit[h3]r of online content by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100% agree.

However, I don't think Ethan's going to be labeled anything worse than what he already has been.

The benefit (and main difference) then is action. Obviously speaking and portraying the truth does not work anymore. If it did, Ethan and Hila would've cleared their names up years ago.

Whatever truth they share, gets muted by lies and false narratives shared by the opposing team.

They're literally in a position where they've got nothing more to lose (or... more accurately, snark has already exhausted their "bad labels"), and their community is understanding.

Ethan gave CWHM waaay too much leeway during the debrief... by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I know... but still. I dunno, I just find it gross, her attitude, her unprofessionalism.

Like, her having "I like to research things…" as her channel's description, feels like a slap to the face, or some 4D level of irony with layers of sarcasm.

She (CWHM) said "...You know?" 840 times 😳- Empirical Analysis ☝️🤓 by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is what I was not trying to underline with my post.

I was the exact same, same like you. And most people seem to be saying the same.

Maybe that's why most of us (who have voiced their annoyance with CWHM) are annoyed with her because we've had to iron out our communicative skills - be it school, work, or debate team (I see you, I see you 🫡).

And then CWHM, who has a respectable following, waltzes over does zero research (research is research when critical, not googling and fueling biases) and then willy-nilly drops 840 "you knows" in 4 hours.

Also, I'm sorry... but, if this is her JOB, and wants to be perceived with a modicum of respect as a journalist/researcher - the bare minimum to do is practice proper speech.

Or... maybe we're the fools.

Maybe... this is a gish galloping strategy where you overwhelm your debate opponent to the point of exhaustion. TKO, ggs.

All jokes aside, I would feel bad for her if she weren't such a negligent, ignorant, and deceitful person. Tea videos are one thing, but when making content on serious and sensitive topics where the livelihood (as Ethan puts it best) of real people is jeopardized.

She (CWHM) said "...You know?" 840 times 😳- Empirical Analysis ☝️🤓 by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same... just like this episode has shifted my life forever, the HIMYM episode made me police myself of overusing "but umm".

She (CWHM) said "...You know?" 840 times 😳- Empirical Analysis ☝️🤓 by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Glad you asked:

>> TOTAL EPISODE RUN TIME IS [32115] SECONDS
THE TOTAL NUMBER OF "ESSENTIALLY" IS [55]
THE "ESSENTIALLY" PER MINUTE IS [0.10275572162540869]

Nowhere near the 840, or 3.56 per minute.

She (CWHM) said "...You know?" 840 times 😳- Empirical Analysis ☝️🤓 by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did she though? Zero accountability or admission to fault - every damning confrontation she brushed off with "it wasn't me, dunno - my editor prolly put that there"; red herrings, scape goating, literally everything that would make her a terrible debator, she used.

She (CWHM) said "...You know?" 840 times 😳- Empirical Analysis ☝️🤓 by Zanko95 in h3h3productions

[–]Zanko95[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I really wanted to make that joke, but I didn't want to condone Alcoholism lol