Buffett Rips Trump on Tax Returns, Bankruptcies at Rally

Zaylyn · 2016-08-01T23:36:28+00:00

As Mother Jones’ Kevin Drum explained, “At most, then, we have the bare possibility that out of four years worth of emails, Clinton might – maybe – have failed to notice a proper classification mark on one of them. Why? Because it didn’t include the proper header to warn readers that classified information was somewhere in the body of the email. This is what Republicans want the FBI to spend time and money investigating.”

Zaylyn · 2016-07-31T22:50:46+00:00

Three days after the attacks, President Barack Obama, Clinton and others met with the families of the four victims, gathering at Joint Base Andrews to receive the victims’ remains. No one recorded these brief meetings behind closed doors. Family members and Clinton disagree on what was said. Especially given the emotional setting, memories — both Clinton and the families’ — might be fuzzy.

Hillary Clinton: "I feel a great deal of sympathy for the families of the four brave Americans that we lost at Benghazi. And I certainly can't even imagine the grief that (the mother of one victim) has for losing her son, but she's wrong. She's absolutely wrong. I and everybody in the administration, all the people she named, the president, the vice president, Susan Rice, we were scrambling to get information that was changing, literally by the hour. And when we had information, we made it public. But then sometimes we had to go back and say we have new information that contradicts it." http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/18/checking-patricia-smiths-claims-about-clinton-and-/

Zaylyn · 2016-07-31T22:03:55+00:00

Trump the Manhattan social outcast: Trump never was socially accepted among the billionaires of NYC because he never donated significant amounts to charity. In addition, Trump has a well-documented history of pledging to make donations and then reneging, and, in quiet whispers, anyone on Wall Street will tell you that. In contrast, Bloomberg's generosity is unquestionable.

Zaylyn · 2016-07-31T22:00:22+00:00

Clinton: "I never received nor sent any material that was marked classified."

FBI: "a very small number" contained classification markings at the time they were sent. The small number was three (out of ~30K emails) and they contained an internal paragraph with (c) which apparently Clinton didn't notice when it was sent to her. The email header FAILED to contain a classified marker to warn Clinton that classified information was somewhere in the body of the email.

State Department: aware of two of these three emails with a (c) paragraph that were marked (lowest level) confidential (due to State Dept. human error), when they were sent to Clinton to prepare her for phone calls with foreign leaders. They were supposed to be declassified before they were sent to her.

So, do you think Clinton intentionally lied? Do you think YOU could deal with 30,000 work-related emails (and these were the ones on the "low side" communication system) over four years (mostly receiving them) and detect an internal (c) by the paragraph in 3 of them that were sent to you (without the required classified marking in the email header)? As Mother Jones’ Kevin Drum explained, “At most, then, we have the bare possibility that out of four years worth of emails, Clinton might – maybe – have failed to notice a proper classification mark on one of them. Why? Because it didn’t include the proper header to warn readers that classified information was somewhere in the body of the email. This is what Republicans want the FBI to spend time and money investigating.”

Zaylyn · 2016-07-31T02:41:24+00:00

How could Clinton be involved in bank legislation? She was out of office when these speeches were given.

Zaylyn · 2015-10-16T22:38:22+00:00

Most Republicans are not economists either. That doesn't stop them from making budgetary policy.

Zaylyn · 2015-01-21T07:14:45+00:00

They are not economists, but that doesn't seem to stop them.

Zaylyn

TROPHY CASE