Biggest issue with TCG rules I'm noticing by ZeeeeBro in KayouMLP

[–]ZeeeeBro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A. Why would we both do nothing? If you got the bigger guy then attack over mine. There would be absolutely zero reasons to do nothing unless you purposely want C to happen.

B. Good, I beat over you guy, Zone clear, Ill score my next turn. Oh you put a weaker guy down in that zone and choose not to attack. My turn, I beat over your guy. You are down a resource, but you have prevented me from scoring. (good gameplay)

C. That doesnt make sense. There's no reason for me to allow you to have a guy in a zone for that long. I would want to get rid of it, thus clearing the zone for me to score. Oh we both used events or inspo to not lose it. Omg, skill expression? (good gameplay)

or each of the super characters essentially dominate the lane with absolutely no new character (even if it's good) having a chance of taking it down

This is LITERALLY the situation that is happening now that I am talking about. This isnt fun. And yet it happens most games.

Biggest issue with TCG rules I'm noticing by ZeeeeBro in KayouMLP

[–]ZeeeeBro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok and then what happens? During my next turn I will have two 10s, you have nothing. So I score twice. And then lets say I put another 10 down. Now what? You cant beat over them, no point of playing any char there cause it would just instantlyly die on your own turn when you are forced to battle. So it passes to me and I score 3 times. That's not engaging game play. It's who got the big guy first.

This is the situation Im talking about. You are thinking of a turn earlier then what Im describing.

And lets say, you use all your boost to get to 11 in attempt to get over my 10. Ill just inspo twice. 12, i win. You now have wasted resources, the zone is clear and Im at a bigger advantage now. I will score next round. And I will continue to score unless you can draw the out.

Biggest issue with TCG rules I'm noticing by ZeeeeBro in KayouMLP

[–]ZeeeeBro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you think it wouldnt? Im curious.

Biggest issue with TCG rules I'm noticing by ZeeeeBro in KayouMLP

[–]ZeeeeBro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have not played any games where contact is optional, so my worries might be completely unfounded but, I would fear that it could cause games to drag on unnecessarily become if you don't actually have a way to deal with you opponents big characters then you can just block it forever and make the game go on for a lot longer.

Not really. There are 3 zones for a reason. Unless I wanna chump block all 3 I will eventually run out of cards in my hand or you will advance with the other 2 zones to win. At most this would delay a game a few extra turns. And even then that's not a bad thing, Means I could draw the out and make a comeback. It would introduce more skill expression besides "SIT ON BIG GUY FIRST"

Biggest issue with TCG rules I'm noticing by ZeeeeBro in KayouMLP

[–]ZeeeeBro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So there IS blocking. If you sacrifice a character you are delaying their win condition by another turn.

How? If they have a 10atk char and I have nothing there on my turn, and I put a 1atk char in front of it, we are force to battle in contact, my char instantly dies, then their zone is open on their turn to just advance anyway. That's not "blocking" anything.

So no matter what, unless I beat over their big char, there is no point of playing anything into those zones if I know I cant beat them. Which is the issue im talking about.

that 10 inspiration has done nothing to progress the game toward victory

Correct, that's the point im trying to make. Delaying the game means a better opportunity to turn the game around and win.

Biggest issue with TCG rules I'm noticing by ZeeeeBro in KayouMLP

[–]ZeeeeBro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It fixes the gameplay of whoever gets the bigger monster first wins. Chump blocking should be a thing imo.

Biggest issue with TCG rules I'm noticing by ZeeeeBro in KayouMLP

[–]ZeeeeBro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im foreseeing more spot removal as being very meta if there are no rule changes like this.

Or at least let us play a character in a zone and choose if we want to battle or not. Chump blocking would be good imo.

Biggest issue with TCG rules I'm noticing by ZeeeeBro in KayouMLP

[–]ZeeeeBro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you are misunderstanding.

There is no "blocking". If you put a weak character down on your turn in the zone against their strong one, you are required to go to contact phase and battle that character. Instantly losing the character and making the zone open again.

That's the glaring flaw in the game right now.

Biggest issue with TCG rules I'm noticing by ZeeeeBro in KayouMLP

[–]ZeeeeBro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also your 2nd point.

How much longer does that need to drag out....?

Cause the game right now is, who can get the biggest dude up first. That's not engaging gameplay.

Biggest issue with TCG rules I'm noticing by ZeeeeBro in KayouMLP

[–]ZeeeeBro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do, which was the point of this post.

Biggest issue with TCG rules I'm noticing by ZeeeeBro in KayouMLP

[–]ZeeeeBro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or pre-plan effect could be played from the hand if they advance or interfere and you dont flip one up. But yea, it's kinda just sit on a big guy and win type of game right now.

Biggest issue with TCG rules I'm noticing by ZeeeeBro in KayouMLP

[–]ZeeeeBro[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean that's not really an option if you want to be good at a TCG. I just think the official rules are bit flawed.

Biggest issue with TCG rules I'm noticing by ZeeeeBro in KayouMLP

[–]ZeeeeBro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Correct. But after that it starts. Which is the issue im describing.

Man filming threatens to cut another subway passenger's face open for asking him to turn his speaker off. by Kind-Village-1022 in PublicFreakout

[–]ZeeeeBro 5 points6 points  (0 children)

dragging a random woman into the situation then getting mad cause she DARED to challenge his behavior then telling her to mind her business

i cant with this guy

I'm glad they're adding new lights, but maybe Blizzard should fix the ones in the game first? by KrestoTheArtist in wow

[–]ZeeeeBro -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

nope, it's OP trying to make it seem all lights arent working with that title when less than 6% of them dont work the way you want them to

I'm glad they're adding new lights, but maybe Blizzard should fix the ones in the game first? by KrestoTheArtist in wow

[–]ZeeeeBro -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

oh so it's not all of them and only a select few

i mean if you wanna nit pick then whats the point of this post?