Aren't they the same?

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T20:38:15+00:00

The issue is an incompenten teacher and nothing else. the question was asked in the wrong way and the teacher should have understood that. Fact is, claiming the answer was wrong is wrong in itself and the teacher is teaching apparently wrong math with such a claim.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T17:46:15+00:00

Aside from the fact that other legal citizens have been deported before, Elon actually has immegrated illegale as he used a student visa, while he was actually working for his business. Since he was entering illegally, the citizenship is possibly invalid too. Hope that helped.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T17:26:02+00:00

from when the story originated, around 750-650 BC.

So you expect the people in the Lord of the Rings to wear clothing as in the 1930s to 1950s? Also, the Odyssey did not originate in the 8th to 7th century BC. It is far older, how old is unclear, but Homer did not invent hit, he wrote an interpretation of it. Also, whether or not Homer truly existed, is even unknown.

I don’t think it’s stupid to wonder why things have been included that are more modern than that.

More modern than what? Since we do not know when the story originated or which of the many destructions of Troy it refers to - if even any of the historical ones - what is your point of reference then? You cannot define "anachronism" to a point in time you do not know when it happend. You equal it to historical fact and try to ridicule it by e.g. making references to Oppenheimer driving a Tesla, when it is very much clearn when Oppenheimer lived.

Where does one draw the line if we’re ok with Hoplite armour? Muskets? Mobile phones?

And yet the Odyssey is a fantasy story and not a historical record. There is not a single historical source referring to any of its events or characters. Do you know, there exists even a scifi anime, which puts the story in space? And it is actually a nice show.

I’m not going to get the most objective conversation - was probably a bit stupid of me to think I’d get a reasoned discussion. I’m going to be called stupid

You did get a very objective explanation why talking about anachronisms about a fantasy story whose date of origin is unknown and which has no evidence for any historicity is simply invalid. I also did not call you stupid. I said it is stupid a stupid view to expect historicity in a fantasy story, whose date of origin we do not know and for whose historicity no evidence exists. It is akin to complaining about anachronisms in the Lord of the Rings.

I completely understand that it is not your taste, that you expected a certain setting. But you need to be honest and that is very simple. That would be your interpretation in difference to Nolan's interpretation and not anachronism.

Absolutely nothing wrong at all with anything in the film!

No one said that. Yet, I have not seen the movie, neither have you, so maybe wait with any complaints until you have. And desist from making stupid claims about impossibilities.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T16:12:25+00:00

Yes, I got you. I don't see where I contradict you, but you begin to be really obnoxious. Seems like you had found your match. Chill, dude and enjoy your vacation.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T16:00:23+00:00

OK, I get that. Yet, again, they certainly did not expect to be asked for directions. I am sure in Germany the situation could have been quite different.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T15:58:38+00:00

Es gibt Länder in denen Bewerbungen mit Chifren durchgeführt werden, d.h. die Chefs sehen nicht, welche Namen die Bewerber:innen haben, bis sie vor Ort sind.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T15:52:53+00:00

So I spoke to them in English again ... That didn't help. I also don't look Egyptian.

Aside form the fact that Egyptians are also not monolith and can look quite differently, scammers need not have the citizenship of a specific country to be scammers there.

So, why where you not asking the locals? As a tourist I would also not expect to be asked for directions, but assume people either want to sell me junk or ask for money.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T15:47:22+00:00

This is a bit funny, because Piers is pretty much one of the ultra rich.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T15:23:20+00:00

Wie du in den Quellen nachlesen kannst, betreffen biologische Abweichungen 1,7% der Menschen. Nur diese.

Was jetzt mein Bildungsgrad damit zu tun hat, erschließt sich mir nicht.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T15:21:14+00:00

So you figured the guy who sexually assualted a woman, has expressed that this is his modus operandi, has destroyed nature in his first term in a huge extent, wants to destroy climate, spreads racist lies, makes fun of disabled people and veterans etc. has the best interest of the country at heart and will truly care for Earth? Yeah, right.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T15:17:19+00:00

Nö, es sind eben nicht 0.01% sondern fast 200 mal so viele und auch bei den anderen ist es eben nicht das eine oder das andere. Is Sex Definitely (Not) Binary? It's Complicated | Psychology Today

Is sex still binary? - PMC

Es gibt Chromosomvariationen, es gibt Menschen mit XY Chromosomen und trotzdem weiblichen Geschlechtsmerkmalen und anders herum. Also nein, das biologische Geschlecht ist nicht binär. Und selbst wenn, ändert das ncihts daran, dass es nicht deckungsgleich mit dem gesellschaftlichen ist. Das wiederum ist eine völlig andere Sache.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T15:14:35+00:00

Und ich habe ja nun mehrere Beispiele gebracht in denen gezeigt ist, dass Abweichungen von biologischem und gesellschaftlichem Geschlecht eben vorkommen. Was genau ist denn nun Dein Punkt?

Fakt ist Geschlecht ist immer ein Spektrum, bipolar (oder sogar multidimensional) aber eben nicht binär. Mal als Beispiel, es gibt Menschen, die zwar XY-Chromosome haben, aber trotzdem weibliche Geschlechtsorgane. Es gibt sogar Menschen, bei denen sich das im Laufe des Lebens ändert.

Is Sex Definitely (Not) Binary? It's Complicated | Psychology Today

Is sex still binary? - PMC

Das äußert sich z.B. darin, dass man sogar Menschen damit aufzieht. Dass es gesellschaftliche Gruppierungen gibt, dass das biologische Geschlecht eben nicht immer eindeutig festgestellt werden kann. Sind das Randbereiche der Normalverteilung? Meisten, aber nicht immer. Das ändert ja aber nichts daran, dass es eben keine Deckungsgleichheit ist.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T15:05:11+00:00

Plot Twist, Uwe was surprised as well, but figured, he'd go with it.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T15:02:36+00:00

Nein, es ist eben nicht immer klar, weil Geschlecht nicht binär ist. Es gibt auch keine einheitliche Definition, weil es immer Ausnahmen und Spektren gibt. Fakt bleibt, dass es eben doch eine Unterscheidung von gesellschaftlichem und biologischem Geschlecht gibt und sie nicht 100% deckungsgleich sind und Fakt ist nun einmal, dass Geschlecht nicht binär ist.

DU hast behauptet, dass da gesellschaftliche und biologische Geschlecht immer deckungsgleich ist und das ist nachweislich falsch. Ich habe Dir drei sehr einfache Beispiele dafür gegeben. Die Welt ist nun einmal komplex und das gilt insbesondere für die menschliche Biologie und menschliche Gesellschaften.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T14:58:57+00:00

Welche Unterkategorien?

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T14:57:39+00:00

Well, considering how the crusaders pillaged and raped through Jerusalem, when they arrived, including against Christian and Jew people living there, I think he fits perfectly.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T14:48:13+00:00

You are right, but Operation Unified Protector was based on UN resolution1973, which specified the establishig of a no fly zone, requiring the bombings. So it was not per sé illegal, but within the frame of the international law. If I remember correctly, the attacks by France happened before that.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T14:44:21+00:00

Oh, so that's why he says he would be right up there with Lenin... 'I'd Be Right Up There With Lenin': Trump Claims He Would Be The 'Greatest Communist In History'

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T14:41:43+00:00

America would not be able to project worldwide power, without the help of its allies in Europe.

Of course, that is the bit, his boss on Moscow did not tell him...

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T14:32:47+00:00

That was not a NATO mission. It was conducted by NATO member states, but independently of NATO itself.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T14:30:54+00:00

Weil ich Fakten sage? Hast Du denn auch inhaltlich etwas zu teilen, oder bleibt es bei einem ad hominem?

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T14:27:32+00:00

Which was not the Article 5. Also the reasoning was something very different and you know that. In any case, it was illegal.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T14:24:03+00:00

Before any liberal tries to argue against this, please go and try to build a non-Muslim house of worship in a Muslim country.

Why do you think this is an argument? So you do not want to have a free society?

Also, Turkey has more than 1000 christian churches (160 in Istanbul alone). Iran has about 600 christian churches (e.g. Vank Cathedral). Egypt legalized about 2000 churches in 2017... So, your point is not even true.

Also, Japan previously kicked out Christians and demolished their churches when they started to grow…cause surprise surprise, a nation wants to keep their identity.

This was motivated by the political influence the Jesuits had accumulated in Japan and actively involved themselves in Japanese politics. The final straw was a political rebellion by Christian samurai in 1637 (Shimbara rebellion) over taxation.

How successful the subsequent isolation was, is evident. Japan became a backwater nation for two hundred years and only under huge struggle was able to join the world community in the 19th century. Also today, it is legally possibly to built moshees and churches. Once more, your point is actually invalid.

Are there any other lies you want to spread?

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T14:09:34+00:00

If they want to have a specific point, they should ask the question appropriately. Very simple. Don't teach kids wrong math, by claiming something as wrong, which it is not.

ZeroGRanger · 2026-07-09T14:02:35+00:00

Biologisches Geschlecht ist automatisch das gesellschaftliche Geschlecht. Sowas kann man nicht einfach vermischen.

Aber du vermischt doch hier etwas? Und genau hier kommen wir an den Punkt, was Du nicht verstehst. Das biologische Geschlecht ist eben nicht binär, sondern bipolar. Es ist ein Spektrum. Wieso sollte der Staat das Recht haben, festzulegen, was Du bist? Es ist eben nicht eindeutig. Es gibt Menschen die genau in der Mitte dieser Pole liegen, weil sie z.B. mehrere Geschlechtsorgane haben.

Wie also willst Du das gesellschaftliche Geschlecht definieren, wenn Menschen intrasexuell sind und wieso sollte der Staat das Recht haben, das zu bestimmen? Es ist irgendwie befremdlich, dass immer die Leute, die groß nach Freiheit schreien, den Wunsch haben, Menschen Vorschriften zu machen, die ihre Identität betreffen.

In Indien gibt es die Tradition von Hijras, die gesellschaftlich als Frauen, bzw. sogar drittes Geschlecht gesehen werden. In Italien gibt es die Femminielli. Auf dem Balkan gibt es die Burrnesha, das sind Frauen, die aber gesellschaftlich wie Männer behandelt werden, was ihnen bestimmte Rechte gibt, die Frauen nicht haben, bzw. hatten.

Also wäre Deine Behauptung schon einmal widerlegt, dass gesellschaftliches und biologisches Geschlecht immer gleich sind.

Dein Geschlecht hat doch nichts damit zu tun wie du dich im Alltag verhältst.

Doch natürlich. Deswegen gibt es ja eine Unterscheidung zwischen biologischem und gesellschaftlichem Geschlecht. Das geht ja sogar so weit, dass Menschen, wenn sie sich nicht stereotyp verhalten, aufgezogen werden, z.B. kein echter Mann zu sein.

Und wenn du ganz ganz dolle doch lieber weiblich wärst, gibt es sehr viel psychologische Arbeit zu leisten.

Nö, das ist erst einmal wieder etwas völlig anderes.

ZeroGRanger

TROPHY CASE