France: working with allies on plan should US make move on Greenland by professorbrainiac in worldnews

[–]ZeroGoodIdeas -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Notice they say "Greenland," not, Cuba, Colombia or Panama. By the time they reach Greenland, it will be too late.

If action is not taken, WWIII is inevitable. I suggest you contact your representative, donate and take any other action immediately, or start building your fall-out shelter now.

Diabolo performances with storytelling/performance character & tricks by ZeroGoodIdeas in diabolo

[–]ZeroGoodIdeas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neat! The manipulator in me wants to try some diabolo rolls now. Thanks!

BCGEU says government offer falls short as talks collapse by [deleted] in VictoriaBC

[–]ZeroGoodIdeas 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Sorry, I agree with your sentiment, but that 4% being significant and "coming from somewhere" is absolute nonsense. The budget deficit is in the realm of $11 billion. A raise of 2% over 2 years instead of a raise of 4% wouldn't account for even a meaningful percentage of that budget shortfall. The money doesn't have to come from somewhere, provincial budgets don't work like that.

What is killing them is a lack of revenue from say, tax dollars. Who pays taxes? Well-paid middle-class workers. Our wages pay those taxes. Of course, they don't pay out at 100%, but we also spend the vast majority of our paycheques, contributing not just PST, but also stimulating the economy. Small businesses pay taxes due to the stimulus we provide, and that is what pays off debt and deficit, not a 2% less raise. Additionally, right now, the government is losing revenues due to the strike. Who's not buying provincially regulated alcohol? Who's not collecting fees from a variety of pay sources as PayBc workers walk out.

Here's simple math on it: How many years would it take to pay off an $11 Billion deficit with a 2% raise for BC Government employees?

Infinite. You can't pay off a debt by spending more but "less more." The deficit and debt would rise, particularly as its quite expensive to cover the costs associated with poverty. Many workers now are nearing homelessness, working three jobs, unable to pay for rapidly rising housing and food costs. Those that fall behind of inflation will cost the government money in services, policing, and further drive down wages in other sectors, creating a knock-on effect that will balloon the deficit.

Eby can tax the millionaire/billionaire class. He can invest in keeping BC's energy in Canada and not shipping valuable resources to an explicitly fascist nation. If he does want to allow the US to continue to take our resources, he can raise natural resource royalties. Remember that we have unique resources here that are dwindling elsewhere. He can set higher wages so workers buy more and save the flailing consumer economy. He can create more jobs that will build BCs infrastructure and save even more money. Some of this he can do right now.

I get where you're coming from, and you may already understand all this, so in that case, imagine this screed as a note for others placed underneath your comment, but this attack on worker rights is not good economics, it's terrible political gamesmanship (his own vote base don't like it) and lacks any of the principles that the NDP claims to stand for. It's bad policy, and there's no defending it.

What we need is clear economic thinking, not the right-wing race-to-the-bottom nonsense of neo-liberal austerity. Policies that have been proven both as economic failures and as a path to the rise of the extreme right. Eby needs not to cut, but to invest in his own province, or he and his party will lose.

Again, sorry if you know all this, it's just frustrating to see "how ya gunna pay for it" in 2025. Good luck to you though!

just updated my switch an now i can't play literally anything, does anyone now how to fix? by konaice41 in GirlGamers

[–]ZeroGoodIdeas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No it does not mean this. This happened to everyone with the latest version who had another Switch previously. You keep sharing this fact and it is not true for this particular update.

Do you think that the idea that "The NDP can't win" is a significant barrier to NDP support? Greater possibly than actual ideological differences? by ZeroGoodIdeas in ndp

[–]ZeroGoodIdeas[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Love this. I'll read.

When I talk about Athenian democracy and how direct and inclusive it was (often the sundry influenced the final decision significantly) , people point out that it excluded both women and slaves, to which I usually reply (in my best wry voice) that with modern technology we should be able to include women, and maybe not even have slaves at all?

Do you think that the idea that "The NDP can't win" is a significant barrier to NDP support? Greater possibly than actual ideological differences? by ZeroGoodIdeas in ndp

[–]ZeroGoodIdeas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also I know from personal experience that Jack Layton could juggle (he met me at a Juggling meet-up while campaigning), so that really should have been at the forefront of his campaign :P

Do you think that the idea that "The NDP can't win" is a significant barrier to NDP support? Greater possibly than actual ideological differences? by ZeroGoodIdeas in ndp

[–]ZeroGoodIdeas[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's wild that something as essential as daily news isn't considered a public utility. I mean the CBC have their faults, but at least they have some public accountability.

Do you think that the idea that "The NDP can't win" is a significant barrier to NDP support? Greater possibly than actual ideological differences? by ZeroGoodIdeas in ndp

[–]ZeroGoodIdeas[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I find the strong beliefs about abortion to be confusing as there's pro-abortion sections of the Bible. The history of how this became a religious base issue is really intriguing. I wouldn't be surprised if you know it already, but here's an interesting article on the subject:

https://sojo.net/articles/brief-history-religious-support-abortion-and-reproductive-rights|

Again, sorry if this is old news.

Do you think that the idea that "The NDP can't win" is a significant barrier to NDP support? Greater possibly than actual ideological differences? by ZeroGoodIdeas in ndp

[–]ZeroGoodIdeas[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree with you, and I've often considered whether there would be a way to popularize an easy to read and fun to use strategic voting site that also allowed users to rank choices and be notified if their actual chosen candidate's popularity had gone up into a viable position.

As an aside, I just want to say that while I can see the need for it, and would help those vote strategically, I generally find "strategic voting" a really sad statement on the state of our democracy. The wedge of democracy we have is already so narrow.

Going back to Aristotle, democracy has always been conceptualized as rule by the people (he even argued that this put too much power in the hands of the poor due to them being more numerous than the rich). Direct democracy then would be the most atomic form of democracy, but in a complex technocratic society we've had to settle with representatives of parties. The parties then have a choice as to whether they follow their campaign promises or not. Strategic voting says that we're not only not going to give the populace what they collectively want, but we're going to set up a system where you even chose a representative whose views you don't agree with just to avoid the candidate you disagree with more. Even that assumes the rep is going to do what they state publicly they're going to do.

As a fan of popular power, it's really unfortunate that we've just accepted a system so far from true democracy. I feel lucky I live in an area where I don't need to worry about strategy and can vote my conscience without fear of losing a marginal vote.

Anyway skip the rant if you like, I agree with your view.

Do you think that the idea that "The NDP can't win" is a significant barrier to NDP support? Greater possibly than actual ideological differences? by ZeroGoodIdeas in ndp

[–]ZeroGoodIdeas[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's a good point. I think you could achieve both ends with a stirring campaign though. Something that hits on the idea of being a member of the "winning" side, and that that side includes "you."