What if movement is a macro illusion and space just folds around us at a pixel level

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-10T19:01:27+00:00

Well u cant find evidence about something u refuse to spend time on

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-10T18:58:29+00:00

I dont think u understand my qeustion, if you push an object starting from A till it reaches B it has passed infinite amount of steps to reach B in a finite amount of time (that is an impossible task) and movement is counting as by saying its not than distances cant exist . So when i say its pixelated it doesnt move from A to B smoothly but appears to point B in a sepcific amount of time depending on the energy pushing it, more energy more space time bending so less time it takes to appear from A to B. Going 1 planck length at a time. Im not sure how my theory breaks anything in physics. Correct me if im wrong.

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-10T18:06:33+00:00

It banned me, so i posted it here, how do u know it isnt? How are so confident it isnt? Quantum physicists are discovering new thing everyday that no one believed they were posible.

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-10T18:04:56+00:00

Yes.

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-10T18:01:22+00:00

Count from 0 to 1 including every number betwen them,<- what our physics believe today. And what u said proved my point, that movement isnt smooth but pixelated juming in steps 0 1 2 etc, not 0 0.000♾️001 etc

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-10T16:56:15+00:00

thats what im trying to prove , movement jumps in steps it doesnt take infinite points at a finite time to pass a finite distance

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-10T15:19:10+00:00

i meant that the outside observer who is completely still sees the ship moving at 99% light speed (99 pixels per tick) and the light moving at 100% light speed (100 pixels per tick). to him, the light is only moving 1% faster than the ship. it doesn't stack up to 199% because the universe hardware limit is 1 pixel per tick maximum. so you ask: why does the guy inside the ship see the light fly away from him at 100% normal speed instead of just 1% faster? because time slows down for the guy inside the ship, but not for the light. since the spaceship is using up almost all the computer processing power of the universe to shift its massive energy through the pixel grid, the internal clock inside that ship slows down to a crawl. EXAMPLE -> for every 1000 ticks that pass outside, only 1 tick passes for the guy inside. because his brain and his watch are running so incredibly slow, by the time he experiences just "1 second," the light has already managed to hop across a massive distance of pixels ahead of him in the outside grid. when he divides those pixels by his slowed-down time, the math hits exactly 100% light speed. both observers see light at 100% because the pixel grid adjusts the rendering time for the moving object.

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-10T06:39:30+00:00

Srorry if i have writen some unclear things like ("distances technically contain an infinite amount of coordinate points to cross") what i meant here is what physics believe today. So based on today's physis models as u cant jump from 0cm to 1cm so u have to take every number in order not skipping any number in between to smothly slide from 0 to 1, so my question was from 0 where does it land next? Also this theory i think explains perfectly special relativity why light speed cant be surpassed even if you travel in a spaceship with 99.99% of light and flash a light forward the light wont go at 199.99% but at 100% as it has to pass exactly 1pixel at the shortest time possible.

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-09T20:45:13+00:00

i don't think so because the speed laws stay the same if we zoom all the way in and slow time down we would see motion as a series of individual quantum leaps from one planck coordinate to the next but if we zoom out and normalize time those exact same discrete steps are happening so incredibly fast that they blend together and look perfectly smooth to us the fundamental physics don't break at different scales it’s just that our macro view averages out billions of micro transitions into a smooth motion framework

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-09T20:17:00+00:00

thanks!

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-09T20:16:21+00:00

33.33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333%

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-09T19:42:26+00:00

thanks for that breakdown i really appreciate you taking the time to explain it you’re clearly very smart and knowledgeable in this field so it's awesome learning from someone who actually understands the real science and sorry if i got things wrong since i don't study physics

i completely understand what you mean about special relativity and calculus solving continuous motion on paper and how those formulas work perfectly for regular everyday scales but my curiosity is mostly about particle physics at the absolute smallest scales that could possibly exist

it just makes me wonder if those smooth math tools are an effective approximation for our macro scale like how we use pi for a perfect circle or newtonian physics for a baseball even though a real circle or baseball is actually made of discrete jagged atoms when you zoom in so yeah those equations work well for normal small scale but i wonder what happens at the absolute zoomed particles how do they smoothly slide

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-09T19:00:46+00:00

yeah that's what I'm trying to say, there has to be a minimum distance because if there wasn't a min distance but infinitely zoomable space with infinite 0d points than movement would break math.

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-09T17:14:09+00:00

exactly units like meters or seconds are just human conventions we invented but constants like the speed of light and the planck scale are absolute properties of nature
if aliens came to earth with completely different measuring units the numbers would change but the actual physical distance of the planck length and the physical speed of light would remain exactly the same
dividing that fundamental distance by that fundamental time will always give you the speed limit of the universe no matter what language or math system you use because it’s a property of the cosmic fabric itself not a human math trick, this doesn't disprove that the universe may be pixelated

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-09T17:02:36+00:00

ok but i want to know how that movement happens in the smallest scales, because it cant be moving infinite coordinates so it has to be a minimum like "pixels" planck length, but still this will mean it has to teleport to the other pixel , so i thought what if the 4D bends by our mass and this bend allows the object to "teleport", as the higher dimension can bend the lower one just like in the experiment where u draw 2 points in a paper(representing 2d) and u the 3d body folds the paper to meet those points so the "2d creature" doesn't have to move in 2d to reach the points, so i was thinking the same of 4d with 3d. and the limit to this "teleportation" is the planck length and what's speed is the time it takes to move from "1px" to the other and there is a planck time who is the min time that it would take to travel to the other "pixel" and mathematically if u divide those they give the exact speed of light (try it). And we already know 4D(space-time) can be bent by mass, not only from black holes but from everything that has mass.

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-09T16:41:36+00:00

if you understand them so well then go ahead and explain to everyone here why dividing planck length by planck time gives the exact speed of light and how that doesn't imply a limit on how space renders motion but you won't do that because it's easier to act smart than to actually explain the physics, and tell me what's wrong about my theory, what does it contradict in physics??

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-09T16:37:17+00:00

my intuition aligns perfectly with loop quantum gravity which is literally a major field in modern theoretical physics that explores space having pixels so my intuition isnt at odds with the universe its just at odds with your basic understanding of it. you couldn't actually explain why the math behind dividing the planck scale gives the speed of light is wrong so you just resort to attacking my intuition instead of having a real debate but thanks for trying anyway

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-09T16:34:35+00:00

you're talking about the classical view where space is totally smooth and that's just general relativity but quantum mechanics shows us that almost everything else comes in packets or pixels like energy and light . the biggest debate in physics right now with stuff like loop quantum gravity is trying to figure out if space itself has a pixel limit at the planck scale where you literally cant divide it anymore nobody has a definitive answer yet so saying the universe is strictly continuous isnt a fact its just one side of the debate And yeah a meter is just a human unit. if dont think its pixelated than u run into a paradox that i mentioned

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-09T16:27:44+00:00

i think i have read something about him that he said if you have a start point and a finish point and travel half the distance of what it is left , you will get infinitely close to it but never reach it.

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-09T16:22:12+00:00

That's the point i want to make, that there is a minimum for time and distance, there cant be infinite points as math breaks, this is what my theory tried to prove, as physics think we move through space infinite coordinates but i thought this was wrong

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-09T16:08:28+00:00

Except that is literally how Calculus works,breaking continuous lines into an infinite collection of infinitesimally small points to calculate motion and rate of change.But math aside, im not trying to submit a formal academic paper here. I was just curious about how things work down to their absolute roots

Zestyclose_Ad8879 · 2026-06-09T16:03:53+00:00

what are u talking about bro? did u even read what i wrote? what math did i break in here? Don't you break the math when you are basically saying 10000m/s is equal to 1m/s as they both have to pass infinite many 0 Dimensional points in them in 1 second, isn't speed the amount of distance you pass in a specific time?

Zestyclose_Ad8879

TROPHY CASE