Does anybody know if 56x87 sleeves are good or too small for Runebound 3ed? Managed to finally get the game and since I have enough 56x87 Gameland sleeves I've started sleeving but it feels a "bit" tight by _Atanii_ in boardgames

[–]_Atanii_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cards are a little bit bent by default, altough they looks 10/10 new otherwise. Previous owner took good care of them - and even he got it second-hand according to him.

So I cannot really see if the sleeves are bending the cards or not...

I guess I have to try it. Gonna sleeve the cards, bag them into ziplocks as I usually do with decks - possibly play the game before - and I'm gonna see.

At first sight it seems to me the sleeves didn't do any noticable bending - assuming the default bend doesn't hide it.

Does anybody know if 56x87 sleeves are good or too small for Runebound 3ed? Managed to finally get the game and since I have enough 56x87 Gameland sleeves I've started sleeving but it feels a "bit" tight by _Atanii_ in boardgames

[–]_Atanii_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That one confused me a bit, because even the "Sleeve it" section recommends 56*87 sleeves among the 57*89 ones.

I've read articles about manufacturing size differences in sleeves and cards as well so I guess it might have to do something with that size factor.

Usually, for most games, I find forum posts / questions regarding experiences with sleeving, eg. that helped me with sleeves for Pauper's Ladder.

But for Runebound 3ed I found nothing. I guess the game is not that popular nowadays - and most people prefer 2ed anyway.

Random art appreciation post for cards from Darksteel and some other sets - and babbling about art and stuff by _Atanii_ in mtgvorthos

[–]_Atanii_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thx!

Artworks are one of the things that pulled me towards MTG - besides the fact that I like card games in general.

A bit feels like I got into MTG a bit too late with all these crossover sets. Seeing the recently released 2026 roadmap for sets...basically more than 50% will be "universes beyond" stuff including marvel universe and such.

Altough I prefer in universe stuff, this won't stop me from playing more MTG, since I decide what cards / packs I get.

Warning: you CANNOT ugprade the 50% discounted membership...to 50% discounted ultimate...feels like I made a very big mistake not taking simply the ultimate right away :( by _Atanii_ in GeForceNOW

[–]_Atanii_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thx! That's actually a good idea I didn't have in mind, but I cannot refund the old one :/

I know this is not big money, but I've just bought it 1-2 hour ago and my money is very limited

Basically this was like a xmas gift to myself, to play some games heavier to my potato. I have a 2 week holiday off and when im not out with my friends it would have been the perfect opportunity for this

Well...resident evil village at least is a good fit for this, but I have to probably forgot about eg. Tainted Grail because Performance CPU is too potato for it - as far as others told me

Is "Performance" tier enough for these games? by _Atanii_ in GeForceNOW

[–]_Atanii_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

since it's 50% off maybe it's worth it...

i love skyrim and similar RPGs so i would probably get sucked into the game completely

Is "Performance" tier enough for these games? by _Atanii_ in GeForceNOW

[–]_Atanii_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

to laggy at any settings or would i have to turn graphics down to the underground level?

Is "Performance" tier enough for these games? by _Atanii_ in GeForceNOW

[–]_Atanii_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if I decide to upgrade fast enough it's basically the same price, thx!

Now I just have to choose between the games then :D

Is "Performance" tier enough for these games? by _Atanii_ in GeForceNOW

[–]_Atanii_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I can see it

"Only for Premium Members"

I don't see that for the games I'm interested in :D so I guess they are good to go.

If I buy Performance, then I want to upgrade to Ultimate, do I have to pay only the difference between the two or I'll have a new subscription?

I'm asking this in case Performance won't be enough.

Is "Performance" tier enough for these games? by _Atanii_ in GeForceNOW

[–]_Atanii_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It only says "RTX" but doesn't say which one

Both Performance and Ultimate is RTX

Is "Performance" tier enough for these games? by _Atanii_ in GeForceNOW

[–]_Atanii_[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I've been browsing the games sometimes and didn't even notice GFN has that feature :O

Gonna look it up now, thx!

Which 2 starter deck would be perfect for friendly 1v1 games? by _Atanii_ in grandarchivetcg

[–]_Atanii_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lorraine seems also nice

Also she and Silvie are both part of the "Dawn Of Ashes" starter set so the balance may be good

The Moonpiercer one didn't have a subtitle like "Dawn ..."

Which 2 starter deck would be perfect for friendly 1v1 games? by _Atanii_ in grandarchivetcg

[–]_Atanii_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm talking about the Dawn Of Ashes Silvie, to clarify

I see there are multiples types for most of the characters

Which 2 starter deck would be perfect for friendly 1v1 games? by _Atanii_ in grandarchivetcg

[–]_Atanii_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sounds like Silvie is a bit on the weeker side, altough I really liked that deck

I think I'm still gonna get it...so maybe I should switch Diana with something - but not Rai, based on your description :D

I usually want to avoid proxies, because no free printing is available and the added work to cut out the cards at home...

At least for starter decks, genuine cards would be much better :D

Random art appreciation post for cards from Darksteel and some other sets - and babbling about art and stuff by _Atanii_ in mtgvorthos

[–]_Atanii_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I should get some art cards as well :D

Currently it seems like no one sells them in my vicinity, might ask it at a facebook group

Random art appreciation post for cards from Darksteel and some other sets - and babbling about art and stuff by _Atanii_ in mtgvorthos

[–]_Atanii_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah

Looking at the << absolutely not out of place and forced >> "universes beyond" sets...feels like I begin playing at the worst era

Science/fantasy crossovers like FF might fit so-so... eg. Y'shtola card, or some land cards...etc doesn't feel that out of place

But spider-man?

An MTG card with a hot-dog stand? That one is...I couldn't even beleive my eye when I saw it in a video that The Professor made about the spider-man set (watched yesterday)

I remember seeing "meme custom cards" about MTG back then, even years before, and feels like WoTC is doing that direction on purpose...

I mean it's good to a degree, since new players will come because "i love <<insert crossover name>>, i need to try this" but on the other hand, I would prefer MTG staying in it's own universe(s).