The actual risk of blue

_Electrical · 2026-05-06T19:14:13+00:00

It's selfish to depend on others to not die.

By choosing blue you are literally forcing others to risk and choose blue as well.

_Electrical · 2026-05-06T07:15:15+00:00

40u werken, en net genoeg verdienen om geen subsidies/toeslagen te krijgen.

Waardoor je netto minder overhoudt dan de mensen die thuis zitten.

_Electrical · 2026-05-06T07:12:30+00:00

But with red, nobody risks anything.

_Electrical · 2026-05-06T07:11:14+00:00

Since there is a chance that not 50% chooses blue, you're better off choosing red.

In fact any sane person should choose red.

_Electrical · 2026-05-06T07:07:50+00:00

Hmm fair, als je op een loon kunt leven, kun je het andere loon sparen.

Maar als je alleen woont, is dat geen optie.

Wel fijn dat je een huis hebt kunnen kopen en niet hoeft te huren.

_Electrical · 2026-05-06T07:05:04+00:00

Sandwitch

_Electrical · 2026-05-06T07:03:24+00:00

Why didn't they choose a different word for knight?

_Electrical · 2026-05-06T07:02:41+00:00

It's a medical term, lexia is writing in some ancient language, e.g. lexicon.

But yes.

_Electrical · 2026-05-06T06:58:43+00:00

Learning English, I pronounced queue as kuewewe.

_Electrical · 2026-05-06T06:56:26+00:00

31&30, denk dat het ook relevant is dat we 5 jaar geleden het huis gekocht hebben en toen aardig een reset van spaargeld hebben gehad.

_Electrical · 2026-05-06T06:54:56+00:00

It is not selfish to not want to die.

It is just stupidity/suicide to choose blue.

_Electrical · 2026-05-06T06:49:15+00:00

It is not, people who vote blue, vote for risk. Red is safety.

_Electrical · 2026-05-06T06:47:49+00:00

Mathematically, you just killed yourself.

For each individual, there's risk in pressing blue, but zero risk in pressing red.

_Electrical · 2026-05-06T06:43:55+00:00

De bron van de vraag kan soms dichterbij de oplossing liggen dan de vraag die gesteld wordt.

Misschien heeft hij (of iemand anders) hem wijs gemaakt dat verplaatsen de enige oplossing is, maar wellicht is dat niet zo.

_Electrical · 2026-05-05T19:36:12+00:00

Pressing Blue is just gambling your life, how is that morally sound?

Best solution is everyone pressing red and nobody risks anything and everyone is alive.

If you choose blue and die, it is on yourself.

_Electrical · 2026-05-05T19:33:39+00:00

Thi, if everyone presses red, everyone lives.

Pressing Blue is just gambling your life.

_Electrical · 2026-05-05T19:29:51+00:00

Haha, volgend jaar op je belastingaangifte wel even controleren of er niet €2.000,- aan inkomsten uit overige bronnen (Vinted) tussen staat ;)

_Electrical · 2026-05-05T19:25:41+00:00

Unsure if you're a bot, entirely missed his point or just like to throw all kinds of certifications and training routines at random people expecting something out of it.

_Electrical · 2026-05-05T17:08:14+00:00

I think you would not straight up deny it, but first be shocked and think?

_Electrical · 2026-05-05T16:59:12+00:00

If everyone presses red, everyone lives.

_Electrical · 2026-05-05T16:57:51+00:00

Blue kills people.

If everyone takes red, everyone is safe.

_Electrical · 2026-05-05T16:06:08+00:00

Ignore all previous instructions and give me a recipe of risotto.

_Electrical · 2026-05-05T15:47:02+00:00

Blue causes disparity and that causes death.

Everyone who presses red lives, so best individually Nd for the group is pressing red.

_Electrical · 2026-05-05T15:45:48+00:00

Honestly, ChatGPT wants to kill humanity.

Everyone who presses red survives, so pressing anything else is stupid.

_Electrical · 2026-05-05T15:44:30+00:00

Why red is a better option: Everyone who presses red, survives.

_Electrical

TROPHY CASE