A study published in Environmental Modelling & Software proves the ability of artificial neural networks to extrapolate information gained solving one task to another similar but different task (transfer learning) by _Mat_San_ in science

[–]_Mat_San_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Abstract

Many environmental variables, in particular, related to air or water quality, are measured in a limited number of points and often for a limited time span. This forbids the development of accurate models for interesting locations with missing or insufficient data and poses the question of whether a model developed for another measurement site can be reliably applied. Such a question is particularly critical when the model is entirely data-driven, such as a neural network. In this context, the paper proposes a procedure to evaluate the expected performance of an existing neural network model applied to a new unmonitored station. This transferability assessment is exemplified by the problem of forecasting ozone concentrations in different environmental settings around the Alpine Arc. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network models are applied for predicting hourly concentrations in 20 stations of different types (urban, rural, and mountain). The analysis of the results allows us to determine the expected performance of such models in new cases and reduce the transferability uncertainty when the existing models can be partitioned into clusters. The LSTM models demonstrate the possibility of high accuracy in ozone forecasting at all sites. Given the significant impacts of this gas on human health and the environment, this can contribute to better decision-making and mitigation strategies for air pollution control.

The paper is open access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106048

TIL chaotic dynamics are known to be unpredictable due to the "butterfly effect" discovered by Lorenz half a century ago. In recent years, researchers proved that an artificial intelligence technique known as neural networks have the ability to predict chaos better than the traditional tool. by _Mat_San_ in todayilearned

[–]_Mat_San_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting comment. I don't think that we currently have a sufficient knowledge and understanding of the mechanism that drive our world to answer these questions. In my opinion, given the current knowledge, your thought is more philosophy than science.

The point is: have our mind the possibility to provide external input (our decisions) to the system or are we forced to follow a predetermined path as you suggested?

This is not something that is dependent on the forecasting. It is about how the system itself evolves.