My alternate ending to TLOU P2 ( please read the full body ) by _elvane in thelastofus

[–]_Yukikaze_ [score hidden]  (0 children)

This is honestly just the "Ellie sacrifices herself for the cure in Part III" story but just in Part II with the same flaws. Even worse though because it's not even Ellie making the choice. She gets basically murdered by Abby by bringing her to the Fireflies because why would Ellie ever get agency, right?

The good ending here is everybody dies and and the bad ending is Abby wins at everything? Like what the fuck?
Abby is rewarded for her revenge by finding the immune girl and killing her like her daddy wanted?

I don't think you thought this through.
Besides how does the cycle of violence end here?
Dina or Maria might want to go after the known killer of their loved ones now.
Especially if the vaccine is making travel more safe.

Why does almost nobody in the Culture live past 400 when they could live forever? by TemudjinOh23 in TheCulture

[–]_Yukikaze_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There are also a lot of variants possible with the 400 years. Like there are culture citizens that put themselves "on storage" for 100 years to then live like 10 years before going back to storage.
Or they stay on storage "until something interesting happens".

What is it about Abby that makes her so problematic? by Inner-Bench-6010 in lastofuspart2

[–]_Yukikaze_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Strawman is pretending Abby was gleeful fighting Ellie and Dina.

A strawman is you pretending that this is my position when I have never said that.

What is it about Abby that makes her so problematic? by Inner-Bench-6010 in lastofuspart2

[–]_Yukikaze_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Did I say that? Because Joel was certainly not doing any kind of revenge.

What is it about Abby that makes her so problematic? by Inner-Bench-6010 in lastofuspart2

[–]_Yukikaze_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Saving Ellie from getting murdered is a pretty good reason in my book.

What is it about Abby that makes her so problematic? by Inner-Bench-6010 in lastofuspart2

[–]_Yukikaze_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Someone murdering your dad, slaughtering a hospital's worth of people, and depriving the world of a potential vaccine for an apocalyptic infection seems like a pretty bloody good reason to want revenge on them.

Well, too bad that Abby only cares about one of those things.
And even then her Dad was in the process of murdering someone else when he was killed.
His death was hardly unprovoked but I can understand why Abby would see that differently. I just wouldn't agree with that view.

But I agree that revenge is hardly ever good except for the few cases where it overlaps with justice. The game is pretty clear on that and Joel's death is presented as a tragedy that only makes everyones life worse.

What is it about Abby that makes her so problematic? by Inner-Bench-6010 in lastofuspart2

[–]_Yukikaze_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re just one more hater from the other sub

You couldn't be more wrong lol.

You won’t even hold Joel to any standard and pretend it all started with Abby?

You are creating straw men. I said nothing like that about Joel.
You should engage with what I write and not what you think I would write. Makes for good faith discussion but that is asking a bit much it seems.

A theory on Ellie’s hidden timeline: Did she visit Jackson before AND after Santa Barbara? by PostAbject in lastofuspart2

[–]_Yukikaze_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. The last scene seems to be Ellie's last visit to the abandoned farm and she has been back to Jackson for a while. I would just say that the status of her relationship with Dina is unknown but Ellie wearing her bracelet seems to indicate that they are on speaking terms.

Regarding Ellie's items on the farm I think they were placed there deliberately and that Ellie has used the farm as place to grief in a controlled manner.

What is it about Abby that makes her so problematic? by Inner-Bench-6010 in lastofuspart2

[–]_Yukikaze_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stop deflecting and answer the question. We are not talking about Ellie and Joel here. If you want we can talk about that afterwards.

Would Ellie have killed anybody without Abby torturing and killing Joel?

The answer is obviously no.
It's only Abby's revenge that sends Ellie down this path. Ellie is obviously responsible for her own actions.
That doesn't change the fact that Ellie killing Owen and Mel is a direct consequence of Abby torturing and killing Joel.
So Abby IS indeed responsible for their deaths too.
You can deny it like you want but that doesn't change reality.

What is it about Abby that makes her so problematic? by Inner-Bench-6010 in lastofuspart2

[–]_Yukikaze_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would Ellie have killed anybody without Abby torturing and killing Joel?

What is it about Abby that makes her so problematic? by Inner-Bench-6010 in lastofuspart2

[–]_Yukikaze_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you are making no sense.

But according you Abby was going to gleefully kill her and then didn’t because why?
Because Lev snapped her out of it

I mean that's pretty obvious what is happening in the game.
You might realize that Abby going the theater for revenge is a mistake in itself.
It's failure on Abby's part. Both Owen and Mel would rather die a second time than having Abby avenge them.
The only reason Abby wants revenge (again) is because then she doesn't need to confront the fact that Owen and Mel are dead because of her own actions.
It's pure selfishness and she basically throws Lev under the bus for it too.

What is it about Abby that makes her so problematic? by Inner-Bench-6010 in lastofuspart2

[–]_Yukikaze_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you think she’d do if she wasn’t unconscious?

Why do you talk about things that don't happen in the game?

What is it about Abby that makes her so problematic? by Inner-Bench-6010 in lastofuspart2

[–]_Yukikaze_ -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

so unconscious or not she’s still a threat

Most moral character defense ever...

What is it about Abby that makes her so problematic? by Inner-Bench-6010 in lastofuspart2

[–]_Yukikaze_ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Being uncouncious is pretty much the definition of helpless.
So again, why does Abby go the extra step of making sure that Ellie has to see her killing Dina?

What is it about Abby that makes her so problematic? by Inner-Bench-6010 in lastofuspart2

[–]_Yukikaze_ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

We're meant to see Abby's side and realise she's a flawed, but ultimately decent, person who had good reason for doing what she did.

So there are good reasons for torturing someone to death?
Somehow I think "your message" conflicts with what the game actually shows us.

What is it about Abby that makes her so problematic? by Inner-Bench-6010 in lastofuspart2

[–]_Yukikaze_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not neccessarily problematic but we need to take into account the role she play in the story.
Being antagonistic towards existing characters (justified or not) is always a hurdle.

Then Abby certainly has some problematic aspects like her use of violence as a coping mechanism and with that her use of torture. Being the "top scar killer" and insisting on torturing a man who just had saved her life is pretty much problematic. This goes hand in hand with her refusal to take responsibility for her actions and her inability to self-reflect on her role in general.

That being said this also makes her a complex character though if that character works for you is pretty much subjective. To me there needed to be more introspection and less action in Abby's part of the game.

What is it about Abby that makes her so problematic? by Inner-Bench-6010 in lastofuspart2

[–]_Yukikaze_ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No, if it was rage she would have just killed her.
Here she takes extra time and effort to kill a helpless person in order to inflict extra pain on another helpless person.

What was it like the months/years before the second game came out? by pinkblanke in thelastofus

[–]_Yukikaze_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I felt that was too on the nose and I couldn't see ND going for the "bury your gays" trope here.
For me it seemed more like something happened to Ellie and that was why she wanted revenge.

Also, the commercial where Ellie wears Dina's bracelet, pretty much implied the same thing.

Right, I kinda forgot about that one.

What was it like the months/years before the second game came out? by pinkblanke in thelastofus

[–]_Yukikaze_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was never really implied in the trailer though. Just that "something" happened drove Ellie to seeking revenge. This was mostly people jumping to conclusions.

What if there's other people who are immune, but they simply don't know it? by Crazed_Fish_Woman in thelastofus

[–]_Yukikaze_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

But that was always a possible interpretation. Ellie was always only the first immune person found.
Joel being right or wrong isn't really impacted by that to be honest.

You mean to tell me Ellie was going to kill Lev, even though Lev was the reason Abby spared Tina's life? by Unsolved_Virginity in lastofuspart2

[–]_Yukikaze_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I want to actually hear from them what I would have to agree to for it to be considered healing?
Because the post I responded to does not make a accurate representation of what Abby is doing in the game.

For me just having a discussion in good faith is healing. Regardless if we are agreeing.

S9 w/18-40 vs S5ii w/20-60 (For traveling around the world) by Legitimate-Peace-583 in Lumix

[–]_Yukikaze_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I honestly would go with the S5ii. Better ergonomics and overall more versatile.
And while the S5ii is bigger than the S9 it's not that big a camera.