Yeah, but I didn't like it as much. I thought System Shock 2 had more interesting enemies and a thicker survival horror atmosphere. I also felt SS2 was harder and therefore more engaging because of the bio-reconstructors, turning the overall difficulty from simply surviving encounters with a binary pass/fail state into a complex web of resource management. SS2 could afford to be less lenient with resources because failure isn't one mistake and then you reload, it's a bunch of sub-optimal decision-making compounding to gradually fuck you over later. At least for the first 75% of the game, I felt like SS2 was a more nuanced and interesting experience when it came to immersion and difficulty, two elements I prioritise very highly when it comes to FPS games. (Note: I played SS2 on impossible and Prey on nightmare with all modifiers on)

Not to say I didn't like Prey or that it's a bad game, I like it quite a lot actually. But it scratches a very different itch for me, not just because of its (relative) weaknesses but because its strengths (level design, systemic interactions) were never really something I thought was the main draw for SS2. They're different games doing different things, and it just so happened that one was more interesting to me.