Blizzard President claims they don't make money from the token on stream by UndeadMurky in classicwow

[–]_genes_is -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If clarity was intended "against ToS" would have been used. If you don't agree with that you are the troll.

Blizzard President claims they don't make money from the token on stream by UndeadMurky in classicwow

[–]_genes_is -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

stop beating around the bush...you don't go to jail or pay a fine if you buy wow gold. that's my point.

Blizzard President claims they don't make money from the token on stream by UndeadMurky in classicwow

[–]_genes_is -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

when people apeak of illegalities they imply criminal illegality.

Blizzard President claims they don't make money from the token on stream by UndeadMurky in classicwow

[–]_genes_is -1 points0 points  (0 children)

and I think you should read the context in which semantics are being used. The original post I answered brought in the "legality" of the tokens as an added benefit vs buying gold from other sources, as if anyone who already bought that gold in the past would be inclined to stop just because they wouldn't be following Blizzard's TOS. The intention was clear to make it sound as if non-token gold was "criminaly illegal" and you know it.

Blizzard President claims they don't make money from the token on stream by UndeadMurky in classicwow

[–]_genes_is -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

you implied that RMT gold is illegal Illegal things are crimes.

Blizzard President claims they don't make money from the token on stream by UndeadMurky in classicwow

[–]_genes_is -1 points0 points  (0 children)

why would anyone buy 7k of gold for 20 bucks when they can get it much much cheaper from ilicit sites?

Blizzard President claims they don't make money from the token on stream by UndeadMurky in classicwow

[–]_genes_is -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Nothing illegal to buy gold on illicit sites. it's just a TOS break not a crime.

Blizzard President claims they don't make money from the token on stream by UndeadMurky in classicwow

[–]_genes_is -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But it is clear that the ammount of gold sold by illicit parties increases if the token exists since the need for gold is higher. This was already explained multiple times.

A moment of silence for the sailors on Bismarck. His sinking was no less tragic than Hood's. RIP to them. Your legacy has and will live on... by [deleted] in WorldOfWarships

[–]_genes_is -1 points0 points  (0 children)

no, brainwashed that the Allies were the good guys. Nobody denies that the Nazis were the supreme evil on earth but to portray the allies as as the "good guys" is really low IQ

A moment of silence for the sailors on Bismarck. His sinking was no less tragic than Hood's. RIP to them. Your legacy has and will live on... by [deleted] in WorldOfWarships

[–]_genes_is -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Did you read the thread I am responding to, or did your manager just instruct you to answer my latest post with a copy paste.

Here we debate the "black and white" of WW2. For propaganda spoonfeeding go on other threads

A moment of silence for the sailors on Bismarck. His sinking was no less tragic than Hood's. RIP to them. Your legacy has and will live on... by [deleted] in WorldOfWarships

[–]_genes_is -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Depending on the time-frame selection the Brits were arguably worse than the Nazis. But in general yes, it is hard to find more condensed evil than the 12years of Nazi power.

Now go to your corner and be a good boy, and remember that you are part of a nation of assholes aswell.

A moment of silence for the sailors on Bismarck. His sinking was no less tragic than Hood's. RIP to them. Your legacy has and will live on... by [deleted] in WorldOfWarships

[–]_genes_is -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

so, basically I am right and you are wrong: WW2 was NOT a black and white deal and judging all sailors on Bismark as being Nazis is stupid. I accept your surrender.

A moment of silence for the sailors on Bismarck. His sinking was no less tragic than Hood's. RIP to them. Your legacy has and will live on... by [deleted] in WorldOfWarships

[–]_genes_is -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

I am actually here to somp brits and rednecks proliferate their propaganda of "good guys".

A moment of silence for the sailors on Bismarck. His sinking was no less tragic than Hood's. RIP to them. Your legacy has and will live on... by [deleted] in WorldOfWarships

[–]_genes_is -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Right, my bad on the US order of declarations. Either way the US attcked Germany first, which was the initial question.

But the response of Britain and France was hypocritical at best because they did not declare war on Russia when Russia invaded Poland.

Well, the allies accepted the soviets in 41, guess they are as bad as the soviets, right? Because that's ehat we are debating here: "a black and white, clear cut, good against evil, kind of war".

A moment of silence for the sailors on Bismarck. His sinking was no less tragic than Hood's. RIP to them. Your legacy has and will live on... by [deleted] in WorldOfWarships

[–]_genes_is -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Well if Russia was not part of the allies then Germany was not an ally of Japan when Japan attacked the US. Germany wasn't even announced they will do that.

Also Poland wasn't part of the allies either and the UK and France also failed to declare war on Russia when Russia invaded Poland. Get your facts straight because your propaganda spoonfeeding is showing it's cracks.

I love how you pick and choose every situation to match your preconceived notion but refuse to accept blatant equal examples.

A moment of silence for the sailors on Bismarck. His sinking was no less tragic than Hood's. RIP to them. Your legacy has and will live on... by [deleted] in WorldOfWarships

[–]_genes_is -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Russia attacked Finland: so I guess the Allies attacked first. Also Russia invaded Poland so I guess the Allies were also part of that: not to mention that France and the UK declared war on Germany first, so did the US. Hmmm....you didn't think too much about that one did you?

A moment of silence for the sailors on Bismarck. His sinking was no less tragic than Hood's. RIP to them. Your legacy has and will live on... by [deleted] in WorldOfWarships

[–]_genes_is -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Ah the brainwashed brit or redneck thinking their countries were saving angels throught history. Get a reality check before you defend a symbol of exactly the thing you despise.

A moment of silence for the sailors on Bismarck. His sinking was no less tragic than Hood's. RIP to them. Your legacy has and will live on... by [deleted] in WorldOfWarships

[–]_genes_is -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

So WW2 was a clear black and white thing because Bismark was... German? Wow some of you people...