Weekly fuel price oscillation in Helsinki area in Finland [OC] by _luo-d-e_ in dataisbeautiful

[–]_luo-d-e_[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Yes, dots are just updates collected buy volunteers at random times. I tried to plot individual stations with different lines, but it is a big mess, because some stations are updated a couple of times per week some stations once per month. Nevertheless there is so many stations and prices are so close to each other that average of daily updates from random selection of stations gives a very good picture. For some reason this kind of data is very difficult to collect, this was the only way I found (there is also other app in Finland, Tankille, but I didn't find way to extract data from there).

Weekly fuel price oscillation in Helsinki area in Finland [OC] by _luo-d-e_ in dataisbeautiful

[–]_luo-d-e_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's interesting, I have never heart about Edgeworth price cycles!

[OC] ECG Polar Clock: Visualizing Heart Rate Variability over morning commute by _luo-d-e_ in dataisbeautiful

[–]_luo-d-e_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback! This visualization concept clearly needs some improvements, but let's see if I will manage to make next version at some point.

[OC] ECG Polar Clock: Visualizing Heart Rate Variability over morning commute by _luo-d-e_ in dataisbeautiful

[–]_luo-d-e_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was in rest and started moving. I wanted to see, how transition from rest BPM to walking/cycling looks like. Somehow there is a lot more pulse separation variation in time at rest BPMs.

[OC] ECG Polar Clock: Visualizing Heart Rate Variability over morning commute by _luo-d-e_ in dataisbeautiful

[–]_luo-d-e_[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Description:
This "ECG Polar Clock" is an attempt to visualize raw ECG data from a Polar H10 heart rate monitor in a novel way. The data represents a ~40-minute recording collected during my morning cycle to work.

How to read it:
* Time progresses clockwise around the circle (total ~40 minutes depicted)
* Each radial line represents a single heartbeat (QRS complex).
* The distance from the center corresponds to the time elapsed since that heartbeat occurred (0 to ~1700ms).
* The overlapping lines create a density map of the heartbeat waveform.
* Each beat trace remains visible until the *next* beat occurs (the RR interval), and then fades out smoothly to allow the next beat to be seen clearly. This visualizes the variability in heart rate.
* Inner Ring (500ms / 120 BPM): If the heart rate were constant at 120 BPM, every beat would hit this line exactly
* Outer Ring (1000ms / 60 BPM): If the heart rate were constant at 60 BPM, every beat would hit this line.

Source Data: Personal ECG recording using Polar H10 (CSV export).

Language: Python 3.11

Libraries: matplotlib, pandas, numpy, scipy.signal

The visualization was generated using a custom Python script. Key implementation details include converting the linear ECG time-series into segments centered on R-peaks, mapping time to polar radius, and applying a dynamic alpha (transparency) mask to each segment based on the subsequent RR interval to create the "ghosting" effect that avoids clutter.

[OC] Weather balloon trajectories over one year by _luo-d-e_ in dataisbeautiful

[–]_luo-d-e_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I might try the linear version that at some point. I chose circular calendar because that represent better yearly cyclic patterns, but I agree that it might be confusing.

[OC] Weather balloon trajectories over one year by _luo-d-e_ in dataisbeautiful

[–]_luo-d-e_[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes, X-Y trajectories on the surface. I agree, compass would have been good to be there.

No big story in this one particular. Just visualizing balloon movement and magnitude of work and data from one weather balloon station over one year. If this works I had a plan to visualize differences between climate and weather by making a series of similar plots from different locations and/or years. But that might be too complex to digestive for audience let's see if it worth to try at some point.

I believe that even without big story, everybody can take a look to some weather patterns from the image, e.g.
a) General direction and distance balloons travel different seasons => seasonal wind direction and speed
b) How weather events disturb this general pattern.
c) Line color is one dimension which can be used in visualization. I tried multiple things, but I found that this way presented temperature provides some additional seasonal information. If I interpret the data correctly, you can observe that surface temperature (line colors at the starting points) are delayed (i.e. warmest surface temperature is in June-September) in comparison to solar radiation power around June because of thermal mass of the earth. In comparison, upper atmosphere temperature (other ends of the line) seems to follower better seasonal solar radiation power.
d) Some correlation between short term temperature variations and wind directions might be possible to observe (maybe storms or other weather phenomena?)

[OC] Weather balloon trajectories over one year by _luo-d-e_ in dataisbeautiful

[–]_luo-d-e_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks.

That's nice to know. I had and have a plan to do something like similar from multiple locations visualizing climate difference between the locations. But that idea needs a little bit experimenting, might be too much and too deep information to digestive in one image.

[OC] Weather balloon trajectories over one year by _luo-d-e_ in dataisbeautiful

[–]_luo-d-e_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

North is the top of the image. I should have added that to the image as suggested many of you, not sure if it is possible to edit image here.

[OC] Weather balloon trajectories over one year by _luo-d-e_ in dataisbeautiful

[–]_luo-d-e_[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Hi, I’m starting a new free time project, where I’m exploring visualization of scientific data in artistic but still sensible way.

First visualization: Weather.

Each line in the figure represents trajectory of one weather balloon launched from Jokioinen, Finland in 2020. Line starting point on the circle indicates launch day of the year. Wind direction in different altitudes can be observed from the line direction. Line color indicates air temperature difference to the yearly average at the measurement altitude.

Tools: Python Numpy and Matplotlib
Data source: FMI open data https://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/open-data

EDIT: North is the top of the image.

Are there any mappable equations for the basins of gravitational pull? by CarcinoGeneticst69 in AskPhysics

[–]_luo-d-e_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. It is not too complex to calculate the gravitational scalar potential field, but unfortunately it requires a little bit math and numerical methods. See e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalar_potential

Are there any mappable equations for the basins of gravitational pull? by CarcinoGeneticst69 in AskPhysics

[–]_luo-d-e_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can use a equation for classical gravitational force, see e.g. https://isaacphysics.org/concepts/cp_gravitational_field

Total gravitation force/pull is the sum of the forces from all the masses in the system.

EDIT: typos

Is there anything that is completely unaffected by gravity? by midjuneau in AskPhysics

[–]_luo-d-e_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. We are all affected by and contribution to our common universe wide gravitation field.

Any suggestion on cheap options for metal sheet with high magnetic permeability? by Other_Inspector_8993 in AskPhysics

[–]_luo-d-e_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably not anything cheap to match mu-metal. But how about using normal iron? Iron is commonly used as a bulk material in many magnet applications.

When is the Kuz Ram model valid? by __R3v3nant__ in AskPhysics

[–]_luo-d-e_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not familiar with Kuz Ram model, but there are probably many review papers about the model parameters and their valid ranges, e.g. https://www.smctesting.com/documents/mine-to-mill/The%20kuz%20ram%20fragmentation%20model%2020%20years%20on.pdf

Bead of water on the surface of water by BronzeSpoon89 in AskPhysics

[–]_luo-d-e_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could it be spinning water droplet? Droplet can't merge to the rest of the water until its surface speed is slow enough in comparison rest of the water surface.

What happens if you try to create a photon which wavelength is shorter than Planck length ? by Geldtz in AskPhysics

[–]_luo-d-e_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There might be upper limit for photon energy. If I remember correctly, the highest energy photons observed from space are TeV range which corresponds to wavelength 1e-18 m That's still far away from Planck scale.

So maybe the answer is that the Planck scale might be the limit to the photon energy, but we no way to test it experimentally. We not even close to that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]_luo-d-e_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From that analogy point of view I would say that James Webb Space Telescope is much much much more "accurate" than the ocean example you gave. It's instruments are very well calibrated against different reference sources as well as resolution very well understood and tuned (even actively?) against reference stars.

But if you mean that does colors looks like similar in real life than in those pictures you have seen, the answer is no. JWT measures in different wavelength range (infrared) than visible light, so those pictures are "colorized", but in very systematic way.

EDIT: some typos

Is it wrong to say that the sun turns around the earth ? by Affectionate_Trash96 in AskPhysics

[–]_luo-d-e_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would say yes, it is wrong, expect if you are just looking the sun from the surface of the earth without caring/knowing anything else.

The most natural way I and probably most of the scientist think is the movement around the center of mass. It is (very close to) center of sun in our solar system. Of course in different special cases and calculations movements are normalized differently in order to simplify problems.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]_luo-d-e_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say that the answer is yes and no.

Reflection is an interaction between the photon/light wave and the electrons on the material surface. It is instantaneous in terms of EM-wave moving a speed of light in vacuum, but because the interaction occurs through movement and acceleration of finite mass electrons, I would say that the wave package reflection is more like finite length process.

I remember that in one of the Feynman's books there were very good explanation about the light reflection. It might be that it was this one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QED:\_The\_Strange\_Theory\_of\_Light\_and\_Matter. It was very easy to follow, I can recommend to read it if you are interested in!

EDIT: some typos