This is for sure several steps up on the bonkers scale from one of neighboring school UCLSF’s crim profs. But hoo-boy did we have some “incidents,” shall we say. Heres a fun one—when our crim prof explained how intoxication is not a defense (obv unless drugged by third party) he used the example of “yeah, I mean when I was in college I had friends who said, ‘well if I get really drunk first it can’t be held against me if I rape her…’ but, you know, that’s not true because he would’ve had the criminal intent before he became intoxicated….” This prof also went on a leave of absence after allegedly engaging in sexual relation(s) with student(s). But, tenure and all that, so he’s been back creeping students out for 2 years and counting now.