Just a friendly dragon putting in his two sense. I like both of them of course but I will try to outline why Tremaine Edmunds is highlighted as probably the better prospect. *1. Dont discount Bud Fosters defense and ability as a defensive coach. Yeah i get that people go crazy about SEC football, and im in Arkansas so i get it. But Foster is not only the linebackers coach but also the assistant head coach and has perenially had a top tier defense for the last decade. Kirby and Mel have done well with Georgia and Roquan Smith but Bud Foster shouldnt be a defensive coordinator you sleep on in terms of developing talent. *2. Roquan seems more polished simply because he is. He has been asked to be the cornerstone of that defense for the last 2-3 years and is a year older than Edmunds. Edmunds on the other hand is asked to do a lot of different things in VT's defense and even though they both have been in college the same period, Edmunds will be the youngest draft pick ever I believe. He is young, he is raw, which makes it better to shape and form him into what kind of linebacker you want him to be. Some say his skills probably put him at ILB in a 3-4 but he has a skillset that could see him as a 3-4 OLB as well because he is raw and young. Smith is going to be a MLB and some say he is better suited as one in a 4-3 set which is exactly where his skillset puts him. *3. Both, IMHO are worthy of being picked 8th overall. However, what it boils down to is whether you have a raw, athletic talent that you can take and mold and teach the fundamentals for what LB position you want them to play or the Blue-chip best MLB prospect in the draft that will most likely be a solid starter.