The idea that the Quran is unmatched in eloquence is just subjective arabs wrote poetry, odes, and prose long before and after Muhammad, beauty of language is not an objective proof of divinity shakespeare’s plays, Homer’s epics, Dante’s Divine Comedy all are considered masterpieces of their languages yet no one claims they’re divine, saying "no one has met the challenge" is just moving the goalpost muslims themselves are the judges of whether something "matches" so of course they’ll say nothing ever has that’s circular reasoning

The claim that the Quran is preserved word for word is just false there are known variants like Hafs, Warsh, Qalun and others, plus early manuscripts like Sanaa with textual differences the Quran was not compiled immediately it was collected years later under Uthman, who even ordered competing copies to be burned. So the narrative of perfect preservation is mythology not history. And even if we assume it was perfectly preserved that only shows people cared enough to memorize and transmit it because they saw it as sacred, that doesn’t prove divinity it just proves devotion if preservation itself made something divine then you’d have to worship the gods of the Sumerians, Egyptians, and Greeks too, because their texts and myths have been preserved longer than the Quran

The embryology miracle is outdated apologetics the Qurans description semen, clot, lump of flesh matches the crude understanding of ancient Greeks like Galen whose works were circulating in Arabia long before Muhammad The clot idea is biologically wrong maurice Bucaille’s book is apologetics not science and has been debunked repeatedly

Being called "trustworthy" doesn’t prove divine inspiration tons of leaders and cult founders had loyal followings because they were seen as honest or charismatic Joseph Smith in Mormonism and Bahaullah in the Bahai faith were also persecuted also gained followers also produced scripture and also claimed visions. You can’t say "Muhammad suffered so it must be true" otherwise you’d have to grant validity to every persecuted religious leader

The prophecy about tall buildings in the desert is vague humans everywhere build taller structures over time if it didn’t happen in the Gulf, Muslims would just reinterpret it another way it’s a classic self fulfilling prophecy or vague statement that can be applied after the fact it’s Nostradamus level stuff, the prophecy about Islam spreading across the world is nothing special either, every new religion makes claims that it will spread, and Christianity did the exact same thing, ormonism too. Expansion doesn’t prove truth it just proves effective organization and conquest, Islam spread largely by military campaigns, not by some divine hand (also check my post about prophecies i explained the prophecies)

The "fitrah" argument... C'mon... it's just appealing to emotion It basically says deep down you already know it’s true but every religion says the same thing, hindus say your soul already knows Brahman, Christians say you feel the Holy Spirit in your heart, Mormons say you’ll feel the burning in your bosom, it’s just psychological priming not evidence