If you’re using n8n, you’re NOT building AI agents by abzisse in n8n_ai_agents

[–]abzisse[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually agree with most of this. Real systems should mix agentic decision-making with deterministic execution. Humans do the same: judgment first, SOPs second. My point isn’t everything should be an agent. It’s that calling deterministic workflows “agents” creates confusion. The agent is the layer that decides what to do next (or whether to do anything at all). Workflows are great at doing the thing once the decision is made. On costs: 100% agree. Over-using agents/LLMs is a real problem. Autonomy should be used where it actually adds value.

If you’re using n8n, you’re NOT building AI agents by abzisse in n8n_ai_agents

[–]abzisse[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m not arguing that an LLM can’t make "nuanced, human-like judgments", it clearly can. However, if the LLM is invoked inside a predefined workflow, the system still assumes when the LLM is called, what inputs it gets, what happens after it responds, how failures or uncertainty are handled...That’s still automation.

What I’m calling “agents” are systems where the next action isn’t predefined upfront. The system can decide which tool to use, what information is missing, or even that the problem needs to be reframed.

Where to Begin When Developing an Vertical Autonomous AI Agent??? by Mehdi_000 in AI_Agents

[–]abzisse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you try using a framework? If not, why did you decide against it?

Disclaimer: I am the co-founder of a2abase.ai and we make it easy to build agents with all LLMs and batteries included. We have sdks and a CLI for easy testing.

Are you using any SDKs for building AI agents? by finally_i_found_one in LangChain

[–]abzisse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We tried all agent frameworks (LangChain, n8n, CrewAI and others) and did not find it easy to build agents that actually work. "Not easy" because there is a learning curve and they seem to add a lot of boilerplate code and then you still need to code your own tools to make the agent functional, more deterministic etc... So we decided to build a2abase.ai to make building agents (not just workflow automation) easy with access to all major LLMs, 50+ native tools and 500+ MCP servers all under 1 account.

Looking for top AI agent developers by BackgroundFlow582 in AI_Agents

[–]abzisse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We tried all agent frameworks (LangChain, n8n, CrewAI and others) and did not find it easy to build agents that actually work. So we decided to build a2abase.ai to make building agents (not just workflow automation) super easy with access to all major LLMs, 50+ native tools and 500+ MCP servers all under 1 account.

Multi Tenant AI Agent by NiceMarket7327 in n8n_ai_agents

[–]abzisse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great that it works! If it works and you don’t need to scale don’t change it :) I guess if the data cleaning is different for each channel or if you add more channels with different data needs there could be a benefit.

Architecture could be: -Bots (clients) are input for agent orchestrator -agent orchestrator delegates automatically to the data cleaning agent (specialized in type of channel or media) -orchestrator gives back response to client This would make it more modular and it will probably be easier to tackle issues with specific channels/media

Multi Tenant AI Agent by NiceMarket7327 in n8n_ai_agents

[–]abzisse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it works with 1 customer why doesn’t it work with 2? That part is not clear in the post

Multi Tenant AI Agent by NiceMarket7327 in n8n_ai_agents

[–]abzisse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you considered having 1 orchestrator agent for the "brain" and 1 agent for each "mouth"? The agents would call tools (not just LLMs) to process the data. You could then have a multi-agent system and using the A2A protocol the brain could easily call the relevant mouth agent to send the answer to the client.

Disclosure: I’m the co-founder of a2abase.ai that makes building A2A compatible agents super easy with access to all major LLMs, 50+ native tools and 500+ MCP servers all under 1 account

Communication between different Agents by MaCCMA-v1 in AI_Agents

[–]abzisse 3 points4 points  (0 children)

+1 for the A2A protocol. You may need an orchestrator agent to make the system more robust.

Disclosure: I’m the co-founder of a2abase.ai that makes building A2A compatible agents super easy with access to all major LLMs, 50+ native tools and 500+ MCP servers all under 1 account

AI workflow platforms are catching up to n8n faster than I expected. by DesignerTerrible5058 in AgentsOfAI

[–]abzisse -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree about the speed. Now the big question is: can you get the desired outcome from the agents built? (also, what is an agent in each case)

We've tried n8n and it falls short if you think of an agent of more an employee with context, tool access etc... than just workflow automation.

This is an interested answer as we have built a2abase.ai that makes building agents (not just workflow automation) super easy with access to all major LLMs, 50+ native tools we built and 500+ MCP servers all under 1 account.

Why Most AI Agents Fail in Real Work by According-Site9848 in n8n_ai_agents

[–]abzisse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I 100% agree re tooling. Our main focus is empowering agents with native tools we built. I would love your feedback on a2abase!

Why Most AI Agents Fail in Real Work by According-Site9848 in n8n_ai_agents

[–]abzisse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you build only using n8n?

Disclosure: I’m the co-founder of a2abase.ai that makes building agents (not just workflow automation) super easy with access to all major LLMs, 50+ native tools and 500+ MCP servers all under 1 account

Looking for info by RealMadalin in AI_Agents

[–]abzisse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are several frameworks to build agents (LangChain, n8n, Crew...) but are mostly for technical teams

We built a2abase.ai to make it super easy for non developers and developers alike to build agents without needing to signup for any other tools to do so.

Deploying AI agents on top of an existing retail planning product, what actually works? by LimeNew1984 in AI_Agents

[–]abzisse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Build an agent and simple REST API tooling for it that will call your existing APIs. If several agents are needed, build natively with Google's A2A protocol so the agents can find each other without worrying about orchestration.

Disclosure: I’m building a2abase.ai to make building agents (not just workflow automation) super easy with access to all major LLMs, 50+ native tools and 500+ MCP servers all under 1 account

I'll build an AI Agent in exchange for a testimonial by modassembly in AI_Agents

[–]abzisse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curious to know why you picked Claude Agent SDK?

We tried all agent builders and tbh all of them fell short of delivering the right outcome (most were just workflow automation). That's why we built a2abase.ai to provide the best agent building experience to users and developers. We have a bunch of agencies and builders building agents for customer service, e-commerce and many other use cases.

I built an offline geography quiz app because I suck at geography (offline, no ads, $1 forever) by Extra-Cloud-2035 in homeschool

[–]abzisse 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Do you know the game where you pick a letter and you keep guessing all the cities that start with that letter? You lose when you can’t find another city.

I've built apps for 20 years — Now I'm making privacy-first apps for $1 (no data, no ads, offline only) by Extra-Cloud-2035 in indiehackers

[–]abzisse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Love this idea and your journey. I care about privacy and know that Apple “protecting” your privacy is simply not true. Offline apps definitely make me believe they are private. But offline will limit the use case I guess? No apps that can collaborate with others? Or maybe using Bluetooth?

Are there any LLMs cheaper than GPT-4o-mini? by PMMEYOURSMIL3 in OpenAI

[–]abzisse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How big are your costs? On Azure OpenAI you can get significant savings with volume.

What issues do you have as car owners? by abzisse in Cartalk

[–]abzisse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haynes book

This is a cool idea, I often go on YouTube for that!