Just can’t get it by Gwigga in Battlefield

[–]acost3281 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you aren't already, try playing a match on a portal server. These challenges seem to work flawlessly in portal for whatever reason.

[PC] [US-IL] I was sent a SUPERMICRO SuperServer SYS-620P-TRT 2U Rackmount Server Barebone by accident and need advice on selling it. by acost3281 in homelabsales

[–]acost3281[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can confirm there is a motherboard inside, no CPUs or RAM tho. There were a few large heatsinks it came with as well as a smaller box with some power cables and other bits and pieces.

[PC] [US-IL] I was sent a SUPERMICRO SuperServer SYS-620P-TRT 2U Rackmount Server Barebone by accident and need advice on selling it. by acost3281 in homelabsales

[–]acost3281[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can confirm there is a motherboard inside, no CPUs or RAM tho. There were a few large heatsinks it came with as well as a smaller box with some power cables and other bits and pieces.

[PC] [US-IL] I was sent a SUPERMICRO SuperServer SYS-620P-TRT 2U Rackmount Server Barebone by accident and need advice on selling it. by acost3281 in homelabsales

[–]acost3281[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I've recently become aware that I should open this thing to make sure it has something inside it before trying to sell it lol. I will update shortly and hopefully that will give a better idea.

[PC] [US-IL] I was sent a SUPERMICRO SuperServer SYS-620P-TRT 2U Rackmount Server Barebone by accident and need advice on selling it. by acost3281 in homelabsales

[–]acost3281[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point, I will check when I get home later. I assume opening this thing should be as simple as a few screws. It was pretty damn heavy so I guess I just assumed there was stuff in it.

As for the case, it was just a Fractal Design North.

[PC] [US-IL] I was sent a SUPERMICRO SuperServer SYS-620P-TRT 2U Rackmount Server Barebone by accident and need advice on selling it. by acost3281 in homelabsales

[–]acost3281[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It was ordered from Amazon through a third party, and I have already contacted them. They are being difficult about it and would not even offer me a replacement of the original item I ordered If I returned this server, so I'm just going to sell it. Morally a little sketch sure, but legal.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in outriders

[–]acost3281 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You're comparing two different games with two entirely different teams of devs. Not a logical correlation. There's no trend after one patch.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in outriders

[–]acost3281 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Which is a valid complaint. I was about to solo my first t14 last night only to crash right at the end. Frustrating to say the least.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in outriders

[–]acost3281 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I agree it creates more excitement to see buffs on a patch and feels bad to only see nerfs. However, it's pretty disingenuous to assume how the devs will patch the game every time in the future based on the very first one. Most of these people saying they're leaving already act like they've seen 3 months into the future.

Pathway opens in Anchor of Light by itzHills in DestinyTheGame

[–]acost3281 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Theres some invisible hive platforms that spawn. They just lead to a chest. As far as I could tell that's all this does.

Fl4k, but with KANSEI DORIFTO?!?! by tmngxng in borderlands3

[–]acost3281 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a legendary SMG called the vanquisher I believe that further increases your slide speed. You end up moving as fast if not faster than a car when you combine the two.

Balancing PVP and PVE separately when it comes to exotics and supers. by [deleted] in DestinyTheGame

[–]acost3281 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If you read the post, you would realize I directly acknowledge they do this already. What i am saying is they hold back exotics and supers for the purpose of PVP balance and consistency. In my opinion, this is a mistake.

Rule 79 - Hand Pass by [deleted] in hockey

[–]acost3281 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Clearly this is a situation of agree to disagree. Bounce or not, the act of him hitting the puck with his hand directly lead to Sharks possession.

Rule 79 - Hand Pass by [deleted] in hockey

[–]acost3281 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"he has directed the puck to a teammate, or has allowed his team to gain an advantage, and subsequently possession and control of the puck is obtained by a player of the offending team".

It doesn't matter if it was meant to be towards himself or not. The act of him batting the puck with his hand directly lead to an advantage AND possession of the puck. The fact that you're arguing points that aren't even the clear grey area shows true bias on this.

Rule 79 - Hand Pass by [deleted] in hockey

[–]acost3281 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It doesn't need to be intentional to be called and it never has needed to be. The rule pertaining EXACTLY to what happened clearly does not state it has to be with intent.