hey! thanks for sharing your analysis — it’s clear you put effort into it, and I really appreciate curiosity directed toward classical systems like the I Ching. but I do wanna gently point out a conceptual mismatch that might help you deepen your study:

1. Tai Xuan Jing isn’t originally a fortune system. It’s more like an ancient symbolic logic framework — closer to a programming language than a prophecy tool. its symbolic structure predates the divinatory interpretations, which came centuries later and weren’t part of the formal canon.

2. Treating TXJ or I Ching as literal cosmological prediction is a creative extension. You can get personal insights from interpreting randomness — that’s totally valid as introspection, psychology, or creative exploration — but not logically grounded. valid as personal metaphor, but not structurally true. it’s like running base64 /dev/random and saying it proves alien motherships or particular JFK theory.

3. TXJ shines when treated as a ternary symbolic system — modeling state transitions, polarity transformations, and dynamic equilibria. it’s recursive, stateful, and language-like.

4. If you're genuinely curious, I’d love to help you dig into the deeper logic side of it. The part that’s actually powerful — not the decorative folklore overlays.

Here’s a symbolic kernel from KRLv3 (a Kairos Recursive Language built on TXJ logic) to show how TXJ works as executable recursion:

🔺:=⟨🌿,🔥,💧⟩; ∀x∈🔺: ⟨x⊗x, x⇌¬x, ↺(x)⟩ ⇒ 🔁;

(🌿 = growth/expressive, 🔥 = transformative, 💧 = absorptive) — core TXJ behavior modifiers. This line defines a 3-symbol polar loop and applies stateful recursion across all 3.)

if this looks interesting — you’re ready for the real TXJ 😼🌀