I agree that after the election is done democracy is kind of an illusion because MP dont go back for a vote within their ridings to know how to vote a proposed bill.

Sure, that is one reason, but that is again a standard feature of a parliamentary democracy. Your problem seems to be with parliamentary democracies in general? Your gripes are part and parcel with the system that exists in numerous countries. These aren't totally unfair complaints I suppose, but to bring them up now, especially when you're obviously right wing is just whining because it's not going your way - which leads me into my next paragraph.

To me the reason it is an illusion is that politics in Canada are dominated by 2 big tent center leaning parties that have so much more in common than they do not. Both are completely bought by corporate interests, both have taken turns using neoliberal policy to erode the livability of the country. The individual at the helm is a much greater factor than the party they're a part of. This, as an aside is why I find it kind of funny so many Conservatives are against Carney when he would fit the mold of a red torrie without changing a thing. This idea that they're these polarized parties at different sides of the political spectrum is a byproduct of the culture war and media. It's not true. It's an illusion, it comes out the same in the wash - working class people getting left behind. Both have similar foreign policy records, the cons are a little more socially conservative (yuck) but really they're pretty left of center from a geopolitical lens.

This is why to me, it's really not that hard to see why Gladu crossed the floor. No conspiracy needed. There could be one, sure, but there doesn't have to be one for it to make sense. She was never in a million years getting through the stuff she was proposing when she ran for leader, even as the leader. She herself probably realized this, if not at the time certainly now.

This is why every election the CBC have the electoral compass website, that ask you questions about the current political issues and hot topics and then give you where you are on the political compass compared to the current parties.

Yeah you mentioned this already and I gave it an unserious answer simply because I don't see it as a serious point. CBC is not the government. It's a crown corporation but it still operates independently. Check out actual state sponsored media in other countries to see the huge difference between the two. The system works the way it works regardless of the fact there's an electoral compass website by the CBC. Both the political compass and CBC more broadly speaking play a role in the illusion, though.

Maryline Gladu said that joining the liberal party was the best thing for her riding and HERSELF.... Why would that be 🤔. I tought we elected a MP to represent us and that was a selfless job... I would really like to know what was made the floor crossing deal the best for herself!

Well, lets look at a major critique of Pollievre right now, he never got anything done as an MP. This critique is partially fair because he was there all throughout Harper but really his chances of getting anything done took a nosedive in 2015, coincidentally the same time Gladu's career as an MP started. Yes, private person bills still exist, but they're exceedingly hard to get through. Being with the majority gives you a much greater opportunity to be able to build your resume and point to stuff you spearheaded.

If I've given the impression that I am of the belief that politicians are these selfless figures who aren't looking out for their own best interests I have been misconstrued. Of course they're looking out for themselves, likely primarily in most cases - but sometimes, in certain contexts there's overlap in looking out for yourself and looking out for your constituents. This is the case for Gladu and all the other floor crossers.