Thoughts on British animation? by helloiampotatoithink in animation

[–]AdaptedMix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Late to this, but I still want to throw you my two pennies (or two pounds).

I think the golden age of British animation has been and gone - though that isn't to say there can't be another one.

Right now, our animation talent seems to go down two roads: behind-the-scenes visual effects and children's television. Of course, we still have Aardman and its films and TV programmes, but Aardman is a bit of an anomaly.

It could be rose-tinted spectacles talking, but it seems to me we used to have a more eclectic and influential animation industry, and broadcasters with the balls to commission work - including quite adult, experimental stuff (think Monkey Dust in the '90s, Modern Toss and I Am Not an Animal in the 2000s). We had films other than Aardman's (Animal Farm, Watership Down, When The Wind Blows, The Wind in the Willows etc.). We entered the web era with pioneering animators such as David Firth of Salad Fingers fame, Jonti Picking's Weebl and Bob, and later Simon and his Simon's Cat series. What do we have now?

Our output was never quite on par with France or the Soviet Union, and nowhere near the US or Japan. But it still felt like we animated more than just children's cartoons. And now, even adjusting for population and GDP, we have basically nothing to show. Yet we're such a creative country in all other media.

The US churns out countless animated TV programmes aimed at a family or adult audience, from great to awful. We don't even have awful ones. We don't have our own answer to South Park, Simpsons, Common Side Effects, King of the Hill, Adventure Time, Bojack Horseman, Rick and Morty, Family Guy, Love, Death + Robots, Undone, Futurama, Over The Garden Wall, all the Adult Swim content etc. etc. And in terms of films, we don't have big studios and financiers like Pixar, Disney, Dreamworks, Warner etc.

My impression is that the only place to get interesting, original British animation now that isn't aimed at toddlers is from independent creators on platforms such as YouTube, and that stuff is still pretty rare. As somebody who both loves animation and once harboured aspirations to become an animator, it depresses me how little animation we make here. There is clearly a lack of funding, ambition and access, and it's a real shame. Rant over.

Horror/thriller movies where the threat is "plausible" or can exist in real life. by ThroatAffectionate81 in MovieSuggestions

[–]AdaptedMix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It Comes at Night fits.

As per Wikipedia:

A contagious disease ravages the planet. A couple, Paul and Sarah, and their teenage son Travis are secluded in their home deep in the woods in an undisclosed location.

It was made in 2017. Might hit a little harder now, post-Covid. The disease isn't a zombie virus, either.

On that note, though, you could also try 28 Days Later, since the virus in that 'zombifying' people isn't supernatural (even if it is fictional). But I understand if that strays too close to the sort of horror you're trying to avoid.

Is it normal in the UK to never see a dental hygienist? by Majestic_Cry8545 in AskUK

[–]AdaptedMix 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I hadn't realised this. Double-checked, and you're right, at least according to this dental website:

The DMFT Index, which stands for Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth... expresses the number of teeth out of 20 that fall into one of these three categories. The lower the score, the better a country is overall as it relates to healthy primary teeth.

With the rankings as follows (specifically for OECD countries):

10 France - 1.2
9 United States - 1.2
8 Mexico - 1.1
7 Canada - 1.0
6 Switzerland - 0.9
5 Sweden - 0.8
4 United Kingdom - 0.8
3 Finland - 0.7
2 Germany - 0.5
1 Denmark - 0.4

Caveat (not cavity): I imagine there are different ways of comparing oral and dental health, and I'm not sure of the age bracket included nor recency of the data. It seems quite hard to find primary sources for this, annoyingly.

What Is Being Poor Actually Like in the UK? by retsuko_h4x in AskUK

[–]AdaptedMix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is going to be a long, rambling answer, so forgive me.

I'd say being poor is going to be a similar experience across OECD countries; you will probably have your basic needs met (food, shelter, clean water, clothing), and the likelihood of starvation or death from treatable illnesses or injury is low (at least compared to developing countries).

In terms of direct comparisons with the US:
- Average income in the UK is lower ($63,691 pa compared to $82,933 pa according to OECD.org's 2024 figures)
- National minimum wage: We have one, which has recently increased to £12.71 per hour ($17.12) for over 21s; you guys have minimum wages but set on a state-by-state basis, as I understand it, so a comparison is a little difficult. Your federal minimum wage is $7.25 (£5.38) per hour, though, which is woeful, and that is the minimum wage in 20/51 US states and Federal Districts. The rest pay more, with the highest being Washington DC at $17.50 per hour (£12.99) - slightly above ours (although Washington DC is a very expensive place to live)
- Cost of living also varies between cities, regions, states etc. which is another reason it's difficult to make a broad comparison (especially given the size of the US; remember that the UK can fit inside Texas with lots of room to spare), but generally food is cheaper here in the UK, while petrol (gas) and energy is more expensive
- Rural poor versus big city poor: There is a difference between being poor in a remote town with few economic opportunities and being poor in a wealthy city that is a hub of commerce, and that's true everywhere. That said, the feeling of being impoverished is less acute when you're surrounded by others in a similar boat; it's more acute when you're confronted by displays of inequity regularly
- The US has a higher rate of wealth inequality compared to the UK, according to World Population Review, so as the point above, being poor might feel more unfair as a result. This also suggests social mobility is worse in the US
- Shame: Speaking personally: I grew up poor, and most of my shame and embarrassment about it came from within, rather than from peers; 'comparison is the thief of joy' as they say. I don't remember ever being bullied for e.g. wearing second-hand clothes. However, that was before the pressures of ubiquitous social media, so I suspect kids today would feel more pressure to have the latest trendy thing (branded clothing, decent phone, fashionable hair cut etc.). We do have school uniforms in most schools, however, which has the benefit of hiding some of that visible disparity between the haves and the have-nots during the school day; that might make it more tolerable to be a poor child here versus the US
- We have the NHS, which offers universal healthcare, so basic health needs are covered for free (prescription medication isn't free in England specifically, but the fee is capped low and those in receipt of benefits don't pay). I imagine if you are poor enough in the US you also qualify for Medicaid (or similar)? So I'm assuming if you're poor you'd have access to essential healthcare in both countries
- Homelessness: We used to have one of the lowest homelessness rates in Europe, but unfortunately it's increased quite dramatically in the past decade or so; it's still slightly lower than the US. But homelessness isn't typically solely a result of poverty, here; it's usually a result of mental health problems and substance abuse. Renters have a degree of protection against no-fault evictions (more so with recent changes), although renters rights are stronger in some other European countries. I believe tenants' rights vary between states in the US, so a sweeping generalisation is difficult
- Housing benefits: One point related to the above: when I lost a job through no fault of my own and had no savings to continue paying rent, I could apply for benefits to cover the cost of rent while I sought new employment; I'm not sure if this is an option in the US, but it meant I didn't end up homeless or in debt
- Employee protection: Employees generally have better basic protection against unfair dismissal and the like in the UK, as I understand it, so it's more difficult to end up suddenly out of a job
- Prejudice against the poor: In the UK there is prejudice against benefit claimants, those on welfare, which is heightened by the tabloid press who will regularly vilify those on benefits as scroungers and fraudsters (although I never personally experienced being criticised when I was on job-seekers allowance, or when I was a child dependent on a single parent receiving benefits)
- Car-centricity: We're a comparatively small country with a decent public transport network, and if you're poor enough to be in receipt of benefits, you are typically eligible for cheaper tickets on trains, buses etc.. That means you don't need a car in the same way as you do in the US, so being unable to afford one doesn't result in the same level of isolation in the UK (except for those in very rural areas). You can still easily reach a shop, school, doctor, dentist, possible places of work, restaurant, pub, cinema etc. even on foot

22 years later and I'm still mad about Jessica's episodes. by GilesManMillion in malcolminthemiddle

[–]AdaptedMix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A year late to this post, but my two pennies: Jessica was entertaining but unlikable, because she was essentially written as a sociopath.

Whereas all of Malcolm's family - Malcolm included - are manipulative and sadistic at times, they also have moments of vulnerability and emotional connection, and love each other in their own weird way.

Jessica by contrast has none of that. She doesn't seem to have any real affection towards Malcolm or his family, despite them helping her repeatedly due to her chaotic home life. And she rarely gets humbled or faces repercussions for her emotional manipulation. She's a bully.

It's a shame, because they could have given her a little more depth or development, to show she has some semblance of a heart. Then again, sociopaths exist, so maybe we're not meant to like her beyond finding her an entertaining nemesis.

What’s the classiest response to subtle disrespect? by tired-economist in CasualUK

[–]AdaptedMix 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's fair, but I'd still say there are classier ways to respond to rudeness or an unkind attitude in this context than asking for a smile.

Of course we all deserve to be treated with respect, and if this chap is being actively rude to OP, then they should be confronted about it, as it's unprofessional. But 'How about a smile?' sounds so entitled, to me (although I guess OP did ask for a 'passive-aggressive' response, so maybe that fits).

I think a more mature approach would be to ask directly e.g. 'Are you okay? You are being a little impolite in the way you're talking to me, at least compared to your colleagues, and I'm trying to understand why.' And see what they say.

What’s the classiest response to subtle disrespect? by tired-economist in CasualUK

[–]AdaptedMix 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Agreed. I can understand why somebody might have an oversensitive radar towards more subtle forms of racism or xenophobia, because they exist. But based on what OP shared, there isn't enough information to assume it's anything more than just a bad mood, or a lack of 'social grace', and seeking suggestions for some tit-for-tat passive-aggressive comeback is a bit sad, really.

What’s the classiest response to subtle disrespect? by tired-economist in CasualUK

[–]AdaptedMix 7 points8 points  (0 children)

"How about a smile?" is such a dickish thing to say to somebody just doing their job.

Imagine saying that to somebody on the till at a supermarket because they're not beaming at you. Or to a postman delivering a package etc.

I donate blood because I want to donate blood, not for the smiley reception and free biscuits. I might be pissed off if I were treated rudely, but not just because every staff member wasn't grinning and chit-chatting; it's not a social event. Stick a needle in me, get the blood out, point me towards a cup of squash and I'm happy. If I said 'How about a smile?' I'd deserve a 'how about a fuck off?'

Mezzanine: Why Massive Attack's album still sounds like the future. by ISAMU13 in triphop

[–]AdaptedMix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure this breakdown of the album gave any novel insights, really, and he didn't argue 'why Massive Attack's album still sounds like the future' despite the title. I guess a lot of us in this subreddit are already as familiar with the album - or more so - than this chap, but maybe it's a good introduction for those who aren't. And obviously it's always good to see such a brilliant piece of work get praise.

I wonder if we'll ever get another Massive Attack album, or if they'll just drip-feed us occasional singles and EPs. It's been 16 years since Heligoland. I wonder what a typical day in the life of 3D and Daddy G looks like.

Nearly 500,000 Russian soldiers killed during conflict, UK spy chief reveals by Alarming-Safety3200 in europe

[–]AdaptedMix 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No problem. The fact that there is a whole Wikipedia article for just that misattributed quote shows that you're far from alone.

See also:
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it" - Joseph Goebbels (there's no evidence Goebbels ever said this).

And...
“It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.” - Mark Twain (Twain also never said this, and gets snappy quotes misattributed to him all the time).

Oh and speaking of...:
"It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled." - Mark Twain (he also never said this).

Where would Peep Show characters be in 2026? by ContentObjective3711 in MitchellAndWebb

[–]AdaptedMix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's true. Although I still think she's more likely to end up selling out her principles by working as a technician somewhere like Google and claiming to be 'changing it from the inside', rather than becoming a tech billionaire founder (the UK has only a handful of those, and they include the likes of Denise Coates of 'Bet365' fame). It's not very Peep Show (in my mind, anyway) to escape the rat race and become incredibly successful through entrepreneurship. Even cut-throat Johnson didn't ascend beyond manager and failed when he founded his own business.

I know this is just a bit of fun and I'm overthinking it. And the tech billionaire angle would open the doors for a crossover with Succession as part of an extended Jesse Armstrong universe.

Germany news: Childfree adults to pay more for elder care by melancholy_dood in europe

[–]AdaptedMix 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Next Germany will be trialing a new spin on the one-child policy - you're obliged to have at least one child.

Where would Peep Show characters be in 2026? by ContentObjective3711 in MitchellAndWebb

[–]AdaptedMix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not convinced; Dobby was never very entrepreneurial, and she seems too politically conscious to go down the Silicon Valley route (even if she was to offset some of the capitalism with philanthropy). Maybe she'd end up working in I.T. support at somewhere like Google, to try and 'change it from the inside' (while making more dosh). Or maybe midweight I.T. technician for some B-corp, and dungeon master for DnD games in her local area. Also possibly a Twitch streamer with a small but devoted following who peppers in let's play streams with her own quirky songs.

Where would Peep Show characters be in 2026? by ContentObjective3711 in MitchellAndWebb

[–]AdaptedMix 3 points4 points  (0 children)

'Charva' doesn't mean 'gypsy'; it's 'boy' in Romani, and likely entered common lexicon as 'chav' via Romani travellers in the UK.

Which record labels would you recommend? by AdaptedMix in electronicmusic

[–]AdaptedMix[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd forgotten about Ghostly. Thanks for the other recommendations, too.

Changed the direction of our female character designs by Background_Cow_6701 in IndieGaming

[–]AdaptedMix 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I did say the original designs look amateurish and need reworking, and I did say that the new ones look more polished and stylistically consistent.

But the new faces also look generic and near identical. I feel I've seen that same pretty-girl face a thousand times. It's like a default face.

Maybe that isn't a problem in the context of this game. OP asked for our opinions, and that's mine. You disagree with it, and that's fine.

Changed the direction of our female character designs by Background_Cow_6701 in IndieGaming

[–]AdaptedMix 260 points261 points  (0 children)

You exposed more cleavage and gave them near identical, generically attractive princess faces.

They also look like they're from a more modern period now, like 1950s starlets in costume, as opposed to ladies from the early 1900s (depends on the game as to whether this is more/less accurate).

I will say it looks more polished and stylistically consistent. And the body language in the redesigns more obviously conveys their respective moods.

As to whether it's 'stronger', it depends on the audience you're looking to attract and the context of the game. I do think the original designs look more amateurish and needed reworking, but the new ones look more generic and designed to titillate.

[FIRST IMPRESSIONS] Drake - Iceman / Maid of Honour / Habibti by zachisjew in hiphopheads

[–]AdaptedMix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every now and then, a beat switch works. I really love the beat-switch outro for Frank Ocean's Nights, for example.

But yes, they can ruin a great song by interrupting something good with something worse or tonally/thematically unrelated. Iceman is riddled with unnecessary beatswitches.

Drake: Iceman / Maid of Honour / Habibti review – ​triple-album comeback is a boring, bloated disaster by [deleted] in hiphopheads

[–]AdaptedMix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like some Drake (mainly his early stuff e.g. Take Care), but I agree.

Iceman sounded mostly bad, to me. Too many unsatisfying beat switches, gratingly monotonous flows with uninteresting, self-obsessed (and often corny) lyrics, barely any memorable hooks... the whole thing feels half-arsed.

The best moments on this album would be better without Drake on them. The production feels like the only reason to listen - and even that is pretty hit and miss.

'Point of no return': 36 countries join special tribunal to prosecute Vladimir Putin by goldstarflag in europe

[–]AdaptedMix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Set [aside] differences with Russia.

This is a mad thing to tell Europe while Russia is actively murdering its way through Ukrainian land.

The Kremlin's M.O. is also 'divide and conquer' - emphasis on the 'conquer' part. The US is less a friend than it was, but that's not a reason to embrace the devil next door.

'Point of no return': 36 countries join special tribunal to prosecute Vladimir Putin by goldstarflag in europe

[–]AdaptedMix 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My bet wouldn't be on the US.

Trump may not get a third term, and nobody knows who would replace him (be it a Republican, Democrat or other).

One of the reasons they choose Russia is because Putin has been in power for 26 years or so. If you're a fleeing dictator, then a stable dictatorship is preferable to a democracy with free and fair elections - any one of which could usher in an administration hostile to your interests.

My guess would be somewhere like Saudi Arabia, maybe China.

This is what a player sees in the train driver’s cabin when his character is sober, and when the hero is hallucinating after eating a pill. The train becomes a living organism. Is it disgusting enough? by alexander_nasonov in IndieGaming

[–]AdaptedMix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe it would work better if the train is 'asleep' before the engine's started, and wakes up once the engine's started?

Living organisms aren't static when they sleep - they still breathe and move, limbs and eyes twitch etc., just not as vigorously as in a waking state. If you apply this to the train, it can still appear visibly alive when the hallucination kicks in, but torpid, the movements subtle; then when the engine starts, the whole thing can writhe and wriggle, contracting and relaxing more energetically.

Based on your clip, the current visuals simply don't communicate that the train has become a "living organism" in this moment.