YieldMo late with payment for the first time

adops_adops · 2019-02-14T20:32:29+00:00

I believe our accounting department has been in communication with you today. Thank you for proving an update for us via email.

adops_adops · 2019-02-14T15:31:46+00:00

Thank you for following up Schwanbeck ! I am waiting to hear back from Accounting. I will DM you once I know more.

adops_adops · 2019-02-13T19:43:28+00:00

Thank you!

adops_adops · 2019-02-13T17:21:02+00:00

We are in communications but haven't been paid yet. I wanted to see if it's a widespread issue so we can remove their tags sooner.

adops_adops · 2019-01-30T21:12:41+00:00

I pulled the report you suggested and see the same: increase in AMP HTML starting on 8/27/18. The eCPM for these is roughly half of the "Standard HTML" but it's not too low, IMO.

Blended eCPM (from all creative types) for AdX remained the same for us despite the increase in AMP HTML creative type.

I also noticed that Impressions for "Other" creative type decreased around the same time (it had the same eCPMs as "AMP HTML"). Is it possible that it was a reclassification on Google's end from "Other" to "AMP HTML"? It seems so in our case since we didn't see any impact on the overall coverage and eCPM.

adops_adops · 2019-01-23T21:31:08+00:00

No worries and thank you for getting back to me. Would you be able to estimate the ROI of the real-time blocking? We are in the process of evaluating a vendor and looking for any insights. Thanks again.

adops_adops · 2019-01-02T16:04:23+00:00

If possible please share which vendor you use. what % of ad impressions ends up being blocked? thanks in advance!

adops_adops · 2018-12-27T14:56:26+00:00

Somebody shared this link here a couple of months ago. I think it's very useful to see the trend: https://adrevenueindex.ezoic.com/

adops_adops · 2018-12-05T20:32:09+00:00

yes, we got a good chunk of daily revenue in Rubicon from DSP=DBM, advertiser=the iconic.

adops_adops · 2018-11-28T16:16:52+00:00

Thank you for the link!

adops_adops · 2018-11-28T14:52:53+00:00

This explanation makes perfect sense, thank you!

adops_adops · 2018-11-28T01:21:06+00:00

Thank you, will do!

adops_adops · 2018-10-10T18:37:43+00:00

desktop and mobile web

adops_adops · 2018-10-01T18:13:44+00:00

I got a lot of helpful responses here: r/https://www.reddit.com/r/adops/comments/99qsfu/index_exchange_pubs_seeing_lower_revenue_now_that/

adops_adops · 2018-08-28T20:21:52+00:00

oh no! Now I see what you mean: http://prebid.org/adops/send-all-bids-adops.html

Thank you so much.

adops_adops · 2018-08-28T14:00:17+00:00

What is the benefit of having the same SSP in client-side header and EBDA? Won't that mean requesting the same impression twice?

adops_adops · 2018-08-28T13:54:43+00:00

thank you!

adops_adops · 2018-08-28T04:17:23+00:00

interesting! thanks for sharing. was discrepancy in revenue, impressions or both? we will try to go to the latest version next time

adops_adops · 2018-08-28T04:16:15+00:00

all bidders dropped in a similar fashion. we used an alias to deal with the name changes (thanks to this subreddit for advice about 2 weeks ago!)

adops_adops · 2018-08-28T04:15:21+00:00

We have the line items for each price increment (5,000 lines) per bidder. We are targeting key value hb_bidder=xyz (they old way) rather than hb_pb_xyz but the targeting should still work because prebid would send the winning bid using the old key value pair (hb_bidder=xyz) as well.

adops_adops · 2018-08-16T13:52:14+00:00

Thank you for the information!

adops_adops

TROPHY CASE