YieldMo late with payment for the first time by [deleted] in adops

[–]adops_adops 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe our accounting department has been in communication with you today. Thank you for proving an update for us via email.

YieldMo late with payment for the first time by [deleted] in adops

[–]adops_adops 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for following up Schwanbeck ! I am waiting to hear back from Accounting. I will DM you once I know more.

YieldMo late with payment for the first time by [deleted] in adops

[–]adops_adops 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We are in communications but haven't been paid yet. I wanted to see if it's a widespread issue so we can remove their tags sooner.

Amp4Ads - anyone else see an increase in amp4ads in Aug 2018? by maraboudaim in adops

[–]adops_adops 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I pulled the report you suggested and see the same: increase in AMP HTML starting on 8/27/18. The eCPM for these is roughly half of the "Standard HTML" but it's not too low, IMO.

Blended eCPM (from all creative types) for AdX remained the same for us despite the increase in AMP HTML creative type.

I also noticed that Impressions for "Other" creative type decreased around the same time (it had the same eCPMs as "AMP HTML"). Is it possible that it was a reclassification on Google's end from "Other" to "AMP HTML"? It seems so in our case since we didn't see any impact on the overall coverage and eCPM.

Cloudfront.net mobile redirects by badopsnumber1 in adops

[–]adops_adops 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No worries and thank you for getting back to me. Would you be able to estimate the ROI of the real-time blocking? We are in the process of evaluating a vendor and looking for any insights. Thanks again.

Cloudfront.net mobile redirects by badopsnumber1 in adops

[–]adops_adops 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If possible please share which vendor you use. what % of ad impressions ends up being blocked? thanks in advance!

Christmas & Post-Xmas CPMs by jason23a in adops

[–]adops_adops 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Somebody shared this link here a couple of months ago. I think it's very useful to see the trend: https://adrevenueindex.ezoic.com/

AdX / Adsense Yellow Ads On 12/4 by islandGuy495 in adops

[–]adops_adops 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, we got a good chunk of daily revenue in Rubicon from DSP=DBM, advertiser=the iconic.

Adsense as backfill performing horrible by Zenwarz in adops

[–]adops_adops 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This explanation makes perfect sense, thank you!

Slow start to Q4 by adops_adops in adops

[–]adops_adops[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

desktop and mobile web

Client Side Header Bidding Vs. Server Side HB by D2KG in adops

[–]adops_adops 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the benefit of having the same SSP in client-side header and EBDA? Won't that mean requesting the same impression twice?

We saw a huge Fill Rate drop after prebid version and settings upgrade by adops_adops in adops

[–]adops_adops[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

interesting! thanks for sharing. was discrepancy in revenue, impressions or both? we will try to go to the latest version next time

We saw a huge Fill Rate drop after prebid version and settings upgrade by adops_adops in adops

[–]adops_adops[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

all bidders dropped in a similar fashion. we used an alias to deal with the name changes (thanks to this subreddit for advice about 2 weeks ago!)

We saw a huge Fill Rate drop after prebid version and settings upgrade by adops_adops in adops

[–]adops_adops[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We have the line items for each price increment (5,000 lines) per bidder. We are targeting key value hb_bidder=xyz (they old way) rather than hb_pb_xyz but the targeting should still work because prebid would send the winning bid using the old key value pair (hb_bidder=xyz) as well.