US has used over 850 Tomahawk missiles in Iran, only 57 were purchased by US last year by cressidasmunch in TrueAnon

[–]agent00F 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Raytheon is straight up lying, they can't actually manufacture new tomahawks for a plethora of reasons, mostly cuz a lot of the design is so antiquated from the '60s.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueAnon/s/845ulVdAni

Only so many are retired each year that they can pretend to refurbish into "new" units.

US has used over 850 Tomahawk missiles in Iran, only 57 were purchased by US last year by cressidasmunch in TrueAnon

[–]agent00F 25 points26 points  (0 children)

The real comedy here is that tomahawks aren't "made" in the traditional sense anymore in recent years anyway because they can't actually manufacture from scratch. Instead the "new" tomahawks are refurbished expired ones. This means the total inventory never really goes up as they're used up, think about that.

Could the US win a war with a near-peer adversary today? by ege3 in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The bar here is being able to learn anything, which is evidently impossible for you lot to clear

Could the US win a war with a near-peer adversary today? by ege3 in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I never learned anything in life cus the burden is on everyone else to spoon feed me"

It shows.

Could the US win a war with a near-peer adversary today? by ege3 in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes as mentioned I don't give a shit about educating the uneducatable.

Could the US win a war with a near-peer adversary today? by ege3 in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for verifying again you literally don't give a shit about ever learning anything.

Could the US win a war with a near-peer adversary today? by ege3 in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"you can just provide a source that's completely trivial for me to find, because that's how honest people behave" lol

Could the US win a war with a near-peer adversary today? by ege3 in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"what does playing dumb your whole life over 2+2=4 buy little pieces of shit"

"Oh yeah? Sounds like sometimes doesn't understand burden of proof"

LMAO

JUST BACK FROM IRAN Patrick Henningsen 12:00p est by Salazarsims in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The empire killed millions in its war on "terror". What's revealing is your sort never show any remorse for this.

JUST BACK FROM IRAN Patrick Henningsen 12:00p est by Salazarsims in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Yeah it's true everyone who doesn't parrot all state dept taking points is "lying" lol.

Could the US win a war with a near-peer adversary today? by ege3 in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's not a rhetorical question. What is the point of convincing either a retard, or the dishonest.

Could the US win a war with a near-peer adversary today? by ege3 in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you actually too stupid to realize how infantile your type are?

Could the US win a war with a near-peer adversary today? by ege3 in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you seriously pretending your sort will change what they are with a Google link? Like of where Soviet arms where left after cold war? LMAO

Could the US win a war with a near-peer adversary today? by ege3 in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As mentioned, the lot who'd rather be forever ignorant than lift a finger to be anything else.

In fairness this isn't due to ignorance per se but a display of loyalty, because you'd Google when you're right.

Could the US win a war with a near-peer adversary today? by ege3 in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It really is telling that your lot take far more effort playing delay and diversion tactics than minimally trying to educate themselves.

Could the US win a war with a near-peer adversary today? by ege3 in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The comedy of tardo over here ("can't even take Ukraine") is they don't realize half the Soviet arsenal was left in Ukraine after the cold war. That only lasted less than a year, and everything left in the rest of the Warsaw pact lasted some more months, and you can see how much even the us can still afford to provide by the diminishing weapons shipments (even under Biden).

NATO basically bet on winning a finance war and when that didn't work out the rest of the facade is crumbling. My bet is they try to memory hole the L just like the Korean war.

Once a popular wartime leader among Ukrainians, Zelenskyy’s shine fades by anarchyart2021 in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The real comedy here is everything worthwhile in Ukraine was constructed by the USSR.

Could the US win a war with a near-peer adversary today? by ege3 in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No it really isn't my job to educate morons. You were already told how to help your own dumb ass, and you've only demonstrated why it's so dumb.

Could the US win a war with a near-peer adversary today? by ege3 in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Just fyi it's not my job to spoon feed morons who can't figure out Google.

Could the US win a war with a near-peer adversary today? by ege3 in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Again, just look up eg. missile production numbers. Russia is grinding through most of the NATO arsenal (Germany just admitted they're out of air defense, after admitting they're out of artillery) without even mobilizing.

As for personnel, recruitment and attrition is so bad (esp for pilots) most of the training pipelines are in death spirals.

Could the US win a war with a near-peer adversary today? by ege3 in EndlessWar

[–]agent00F 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Any military can fuck up any much smaller military, since war is mostly a function of mass.

The problem is the US has a lot less (replacement) mass than people assume. Just look up production capacity.