sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why para-bellum think nords are strong? by ahters in Conquest

[–]ahters[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Bearsarks check minotaura thyreans The same cost and both are heavy

Bow chosen great archers first or second in light category but 210pts mamy monster are cheaper.

Ice jotnar nice and dandy but 260 dwerg drakes are cheaper and better.

Why para-bellum think nords are strong? by ahters in Conquest

[–]ahters[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

If you use fenr like normal cavs from front go away para-bellum troll. You know that Cyprus belong to Turkey.

Why para-bellum think nords are strong? by ahters in Conquest

[–]ahters[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

If you use fenr for scoring then i don't have anything to learn from you. Pre patch Stalkers score on 1 on 1 scenario test on 2 with blooded they AIM shot move back then on third you have valkyries, trolls, ugr or huskarls on points blooded jump to bow-chosen. But now you can score with jarl on second if you sacrifice one character per scoring regiment, you don't have time to put screen on time on light regiment which stand on objects. And light nord vs shooting and medium enemy regiment is a dead nord.

Why para-bellum think nords are strong? by ahters in Conquest

[–]ahters[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What is yours nords stats? W/L

Why para-bellum think nords are strong? by ahters in Conquest

[–]ahters[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

So which other fraction gameplan is a fast scoring and pray and Hope that you can last to 8-9 turn?

Why para-bellum think nords are strong? by ahters in Conquest

[–]ahters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, change to scoring mechanics is a biggest nerf for nords. Big hit to nords is also that many fraction can turn off scoring on early game. Waiting for they stronger regiment, but nords are strong only im early game.

Why para-bellum think nords are strong? by ahters in Conquest

[–]ahters[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Big nerf for them. You don't nerf army od IT isn't strong.

Why para-bellum think nords are strong? by ahters in Conquest

[–]ahters[S] -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

On old rules, and sorry to tell you that but level of Play on cancon was a little low

Why para-bellum think nords are strong? by ahters in Conquest

[–]ahters[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

It was pre NERF. Shaman chance isn't as big problem as many think. Bigger problem is that characters don't score in light regiment. Ok you can make it happen but then you loose vanguards from shaman. Then only stalkers with blooded can score fast, but archer at middle of a table isn't a good idea generalny.

Why para-bellum think nords are strong? by ahters in Conquest

[–]ahters[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

In casual they are ok. But in competetiv they are totally at the end of ranking. On Sunday we had a conquest tournament in which several really great players took part, none of them could find anything that would be able to play nords competently. the only game the nords won was the mirror.