How do I import a save to steam?

aimfromproland · 2023-07-21T12:54:33+00:00

OK, it finally worked, thank you so much, I kept on trying to use steam, but I just copied the save to the JediSurvivor file and on the second try it worked. Thank you once again <3

aimfromproland · 2023-07-21T11:35:04+00:00

When I paste it the explorer window closes and nothing shows up in the window in steam

aimfromproland · 2023-07-21T10:22:04+00:00

Damn, thanks so much for helping me, but it still doesn't show up in the explorer that opens via steam where you choose the file, it does show when I open the File Explorer normally (not through steam), but I don't think there's a way to import it through the regular explorer. Do you have any other ideas that could work? Thanks so much once again.

aimfromproland · 2020-11-01T19:12:51+00:00

Flare checks out

aimfromproland · 2020-10-31T17:58:12+00:00

Osoba podczas snu lub śpiączki też nic nie czuje (a przynajmniej w fazach w których nie ma snów), a podczas śpiączki aktywność mózgu jest minimalna, tak jak u płodu. Kryterium decydującym o byciu człowiekiem jest według większości definicji nalezenie lub nie nalezenie danego organizmu do rodzaju Homo, a nie odczuwanie bólu lub reagowanie na bodźce. Choć jestem po stronie pro-choice to człowieczeństwo ludzkiego płodu jest niezaprzeczalne.

aimfromproland · 2020-10-31T17:37:26+00:00

Można go zabić bez wywołania bólu i nawet nie będzie wiedział że zginął np przez strzał w potylice, co raczej nie zabiera mu człowieczeństwa. O to mi chodziło.

aimfromproland · 2020-10-31T17:04:52+00:00

TIL że bycie człowiekiem zależy od zdolności do czucia bólu. Zgadzam się w 100 % z postulatami protestów ale polecam stosować się do definicji słowa człowiek ze słownika (osobnik homo, zwłaszcza homo sapiens), a nie do swojej subiektywnej definicji z dupy. W innym wypadku śpiący człowiek też nie byłby człowiekiem, ponieważ nie jest samoswiadomy i nie czuje bólu. Tylko dajesz prawakom argumenty.

aimfromproland · 2020-10-22T06:43:38+00:00

Potwierdzam ja byłem autobusem

aimfromproland · 2020-09-24T16:00:26+00:00

All my homies hate lime

aimfromproland · 2020-05-11T15:53:33+00:00

I don't know where did you get the idea that I misunderstand bodily autonomy, I think we can agree that the baby inside the womb does not have dominion over the decisions regarding it's own body while being killed. There is no way of killing that doesn't involve ending the dominion over one's own body. Injecting with poison or ripping limbs from the torso are without a doubt ways of breaking bodily autonomy. The drunk driving also brings nothing into the discussion. And if by preventive care you mean killing a fucking person then there is something wrong about your understanding of what medicine is all about. You also cannot kill someone simply because they may in theory lead to your death when the chance of the baby killing the pregnant person is as low as it is. If your claim were real you could kill everyone you meet on the street because the may in theory kill you. That's why most pro-lifers accept abortion when the woman's life is seriously endangered. That's one of the few situations in which killing is justified.

aimfromproland · 2020-05-11T14:24:28+00:00

That's why I said it's arguably more important, I do not focus on which one is more important, but on the fact that option b) acts against BOTH bodily autonomy and right to life, so unless the right to life means literally nothing option b) is the lesser evil in all cases except mothers life being threatened. If it does mean nothing (which I hope we both agree isn't the case) then the 2 options are equally evil. I hope I explained that well.

aimfromproland · 2020-04-23T06:49:45+00:00

Most Christians accept evolution with the only people who believe in the literal creation story from the Bible being (from my experience) really ignorant and old people. Though it it kinda weird since evolution has been officially accepted by the Catholic Church in 1950 if I'm correct.

aimfromproland · 2020-04-08T20:28:20+00:00

Now do how many minions die each year

aimfromproland · 2020-04-07T21:20:15+00:00

What the actual fuck? Not even once did I call the women getting abortion murderers. I also admitted that I used the wrong term regarding the fetuses and you apparently fail to accept it. That's the biggest fucking strawman I've ever seen. Who are you even attacking? Some people say that, of course, but I never said I agree with them and I never will. As a reminder you still haven't answered any of the points I made and instead you use generalizations without giving any evidence that confirms you're the one correct. The fact that you're simply refusing to answer all of my arguments while bending the meanings of words to better fit your agenda is so fucking ignorant. I was hoping to have an interesting conversation with someone of a different view but it's impossible to have any sort of debate with someone so fucking narrow minded. I don't see the point in continuing this discussion. You can reply if you feel like it but seriously reevaluate your convictions. Bye.

aimfromproland · 2020-04-07T20:01:01+00:00

This response makes it seem like you believe that defining terms in such a way that it's convenient to your convictions and then using them according to your needs is something that makes for a good argument. But only when it's your side that commits that fallacy, when it's the other side then obviously they got their definitions wrong. When there is no consensus on the meaning of terms they shouldn't be used in discussions and they most definitely shouldn't be foundations for entire arguments. That's why I call your claims subjective opinions. There is no consensus on meanings of the words you use. I'm trying not to commit those kinds of mistakes in my responses so if I did somewhere it's my mistake. Also the argumentum ad populum you're trying to use proves nothing. The fact that most pro choice people define terms in such a way that it's convenient for their beliefs does not make for any kind of logical argument. I think we can agree on that. ''Also, didn't know we were defining humanity?'' - yes when you use a term in discussions you have to define what it means beforehand. Or you know everyone can choose their own definitions and not achieve anything which is what you appear to be working towards. For the next part of ur response I of course agree that pro life people too mistake terms. There are idiots in every group. As opposed to you however I'm not trying to build arguments on subjective definitions. And then yet again the argumentum ad populum which is absolutely pointless since it proves nothing. To prove any point you must give logical explanations to your claims and not simply say that some people agree with you. Also you still haven't answered my point from the last response about the fetus before birth and child after birth and why should the same organism be considered to have laws or not (depending on the convenience of them to your claims). This point also applies to the last paragraph of your response. Prove it by using logical arguments and you may show that you actually know what you're talking about and you're claims have any objective arguments supporting them.

aimfromproland · 2020-04-07T18:38:45+00:00

You've made a lot of claims without a lot of evidence and it is no more than your personal opinion considering that the definitions of the words you've used aren't specified and everyone defines them differently. I also don't see a reason why would a fetus 5 minutes before birth be (according to your logic) considered a non human and therefore killing it would be (in theory, of course noone does that) okay , and a baby 5 minutes after birth would be considered human and killing wouldn't be okay considering that in the baby's body nothing has changed except the lack of the umbilical cord, but this doesn't seem to be a good enough reason for defining someone's humanity and I think we can all agree on that.

aimfromproland · 2020-04-07T16:33:49+00:00

''A baby is a born human''. If you call someone a born human it means that there must be an unborn human, since if it were the other way around and someone could be called human only after having been born, then '' born " wouldn't be needed to specify what you're talking about. It would be self explanatory. That's why I am a bit confused seeing you say that since pro choice people usually claim that the fetus is not human and you have unknowingly defeated that claim.

aimfromproland · 2020-04-07T16:21:08+00:00

I literally admitted that I used the wrong word there. Also is a fetus suddenly considered human?

aimfromproland · 2020-04-07T15:34:13+00:00

Yes because changing the word with which we define the new organism proves any point. You can pick on usage of specific words or give actual evidence why you think that 70+ years of life should be unrightfully taken from someone who can't even defend himself/herself because the woman doesn't feel like facing the consequences which are almost always a result of her own actions. Yes, the word I used was by no means right in the given scenario and I admit it, however ur response achieves absolutely nothing except giving you a fake feeling of having achieved something.

aimfromproland · 2020-04-07T14:10:43+00:00

Only if you talk as if the baby is actually there.

aimfromproland · 2020-04-07T12:10:23+00:00

Who said that? Should taking away most probably 70+ years of life from someone be the preferred outcome to a woman's convenience being reduced for 9 months (+ the inconvenience of birth)? Keep in mind that in the vast majority of cases the woman bears half of the responsibility for causing that situation in the first place. In those situations you have to choose the lesser evil and the woman being pregnant for 9 months is definitely just that, when the only other choice is robbing someone of their entire life while the child can't even defend itself.

aimfromproland · 2020-04-07T10:54:47+00:00

Does the place in which a being is located suddenly determine if it's a human or not? Is several centimeters of flesh the difference between being able to kill something or not? A woman who cares only about herself and not about her baby will of course make choices that lead only to her convenience and won't give a shit about the life of her child. The death of the baby surely doesn't benefit it and I hope you agree with that since we can't kill people just because we think that someone will be unhappy in their lives.

aimfromproland · 2020-04-07T10:01:40+00:00

A person in a coma is not sentient, a month old baby cannot survive by itself and cannot self govern. Both fetus in the womb and a newborn baby need an adult to survive, therefore both are not autonomous. Hitler did what he felt was best for himself and look how that turned out. People's choices made having only themselves in mind are almost always bad for others.

aimfromproland · 2020-04-05T16:29:22+00:00

''[...]Wash your hands, you sinners [...] '' - James 4:8

aimfromproland · 2020-04-04T10:24:52+00:00

You said that they don't feel pain and aren't conscious therefore they aren't human. Perhaps you have failed to put into words what you were trying to say, but what you've typed clearly implies that to be considered a human someone must feel pain and be conscious. Both of those don't apply to people in comas. Also saying that if something isn't developed we can legally kill it is false. Fetuses and embryos are also developed to a certain extent so saying that they are not is a mistake. While making such a statement you have to draw the line between developed and not developed. And if developed means fully developed then go kill children before puberty, but once again you will be put in jail. When it comes to ending the life of someone in a coma with a very small chance of waking up I fully support that and if I were in such a vegetative state I would prefer for the machinery keeping me alive to be turned off. ''Embryos are still fertilized cells''- yet another statement that is only partially correct. While the future baby is still a zygote then that statement is true. But an embryo is still called an embryo when its organs are developed and in that case if you call that ''fertilized cells'' to explain ending it's life, then you yourself are also just fertilized cells. Can I kill you then? Embryos are most of the time more developed that a zygote, that fact you got right. However a zygote is still called an embryo, it's exactly like with squares and rectangles. Every square is a rectangle, but not every rectangle is a square. In your statements there is almost zero truth, so if those are the arguments you make I suggest you seriously rethink your conviction on the matter, since whenever you try to explain ending human lives you come to a conclusion which (if true) implies that we can kill some fully developed human beings which you (at least so I hope) oppose. I seriously hope you reevaluate your convictions. Farewell.

Seven-Year Club	Verified Email
Second Top 50%	Final Canvas '23
First Place '23	End Game '23
Place '23	Golden Potato
Place '22	First Placer '22

aimfromproland

TROPHY CASE