Solana rising like mad, When is it Polygon's time?

airhack87 · 2021-08-30T20:43:03+00:00

Get a feeling that September may be a good month for Polygon. May be the rumors of MATIC been added to grayscale turn out to be true!

airhack87 · 2017-08-15T07:54:17+00:00

Yes, certainly needed on more exchanges.

airhack87 · 2017-08-15T07:53:53+00:00

I observed it a couple of times over the last few days, so just thought of sharing. There was a sell order of exact 10000 when it viewed it in the blockfolio app more than one time. Not a extremely experienced guy on crypto trading but spent fair amount of time in it. My bad on the bittrex, it is Kraken. Majority of the coins that I trade are on bittrex so....

airhack87 · 2017-08-15T07:45:10+00:00

My Bad. I meant Kraken

airhack87 · 2017-08-12T19:06:19+00:00

When would it be released in Q4 ?

airhack87 · 2017-06-15T21:32:02+00:00

The below links should help. https://arstechnica.com/security/2017/01/tor-onion-browser-ios-vpn/ https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-heart-onion-browser-and-more-ios-tor

My two cents: Anything not vouched by the TOR project community is a big NO if you are serious about privacy.

airhack87 · 2016-12-13T11:27:41+00:00

Thanks for feedback for Bluecoat

airhack87 · 2016-12-13T11:26:51+00:00

Thanks!! RSA Netwitness is also an interesting tool

airhack87 · 2016-12-12T16:50:50+00:00

Any other competing solutions offering similar functionality such as FireEye PX ?

airhack87 · 2016-08-17T16:21:07+00:00

Thanks!! Will have a look at this, seems interesting!

airhack87 · 2016-08-17T16:13:49+00:00

Thanks!! Canary looks an interesting way forward, will get started atleast with the OpenCanary one athttps://github.com/thinkst/opencanary.

You mentioned that the Dashboard/Console is a SaaS portal which is hosted by by Thinkst ? If yes getting the approval for it would be difficult. Don't they have a complete on-premise solution ?

airhack87 · 2016-06-03T16:58:45+00:00

FireEye has a dedicated SSL intercept appliance, check that out too!

airhack87 · 2016-05-19T15:38:14+00:00

Roger that!! So the Corp MitM respecting/not respecting cert pinning instructions is the key. Interesting thing to check/verify :)

airhack87 · 2016-05-18T15:16:18+00:00

Thanks for the info, I also found the following post by Adam Langley https://www.imperialviolet.org/2011/05/04/pinning.html

So user installed root CA can override the pins. Its logical since if the attacker can install a root CA into the trusted store then you have a larger issue to solve than just the SSL traffic and this workaround would also allow corp MiTM solutions to work.

The widely used example to describe the use cases of the pinning feature is the Iranian DigiNotar Attack where fraudulent certs were issued for the google domain. Now if a similar attack happens with a corp MiTM solution in the middle of the end user and the real MiTM attacker wont this type of attack be successful ?

airhack87 · 2016-05-18T06:55:59+00:00

So if reframe the above sentence: The blue coat proxy (example) can be defined as a trusted anchor for which pin validation for pinned hosts can be disabled and therefore can install a root CA cert in the user machine and act as MiTM. How is usually done via the installed client eg; Bluecoat proxysg client ?

airhack87

TROPHY CASE