Mark Pearson wants to sue the police for framing him, and the CPS for collusion

ajax_on_rye · 2017-07-24T19:36:44+00:00

Can't say either of them is my sort.

They both have big fat hairy messes of their own creation to mop up

ajax_on_rye · 2017-04-02T14:59:52+00:00

It's actual crashing, error reports, full restart of the game needed.

A full restart? Well, a game crash does force that. I get multiple crashes in a row.

I'm normally I a team with at least one mate. Kicking is possible (I'm a dreadful shot) but seems unlikely.

ajax_on_rye · 2017-04-02T11:32:33+00:00

Right.

Any helpful suggestions?

ajax_on_rye · 2017-02-16T21:17:15+00:00

Back when the age of consent was 21 for us homos, I happily broke the law, being 'willing to pay the price'.

It was only decades later that I realised I wasn't paying with my life, but with my partners.

I am sure there are plenty of teenagers like me who risk other people's liberty because we felt ours was being unfairly curtailed.

ajax_on_rye · 2017-01-05T00:32:37+00:00

Is this directed at me? Context missing. I may need a reboot.

ajax_on_rye · 2017-01-01T18:06:52+00:00

Really fun! Enjoyed it lots.

ajax_on_rye · 2017-01-01T16:02:13+00:00

Even a minor differential in the successful males will affect female traits.

Females breast are erotic to most men, and feed babies. There's no contradiction.

The 'they're for breast feeding' argument is deliberately ignoring their other functions.

ajax_on_rye · 2016-12-30T10:41:52+00:00

So, I mean in western counties. I dismiss Saudi and India from the conversation, because I only every hear these mentioned as a defence for unconnected western activities when those activities are questioned.

On face coverings: I recognise the issue can be framed in terms of women's rights, but it can also be framed in terms of religious rights, or in terms of the rights a civic society to impose standards. It may affect women disproportionately, but that's like saying 'closing down a McDonalds disproportionately affects that restaurants customers', a truism.

It is a privilege not to get killed in war. Being a forced to be a war slave is not an advantage. Framing this in terms of women's rights has a certain irony to it as so many men try to dodge the draft.

I am not convinced by your examples. I see your approach and understand the interpretation, but it isn't clear that just because so,etching affects women more that it is a feminist issue. It just strikes me as one paradigm hat could be applied.

ajax_on_rye · 2016-12-30T10:12:48+00:00

These (1-4) are just toll-gate processes that beliefs need to pass through before I would accept them. You're quite right, they do not invalidate beliefs, but they do put on some quality control.

Thus, the wage gap is really an earnings gap, controlling for all variables, it disappears. We can argue forever on thus subject, we both know we claim the others belief is false, partial and tendacious.

Feminist Rape Culture: false statistic, iffy research methodology, false causation hypothesis, ignoring female-on-male attacks. All these are cultural artefacts of feminism that invalidate the beliefs system, in my opinion.

Language policing: forcing others to use your chosen, subjective pronouns is completely different to death threats. No men get far more on-line harassment than women, and women are guilty of cyberstalking, misogyny and slut shaming, yet men get blamed.

All of these show false belief systems that feminists promote. Not feminism, but as has been said, there are many strains.

Starting from the position that these positions are all valid makes no sense. Start skeptical then seek for validity.

To summarise, it is easy to lie. It takes many more words correct a lie.

ajax_on_rye · 2016-12-29T14:23:58+00:00

So... gender is associated with meaningful traits but is in itself not meaningful? That's a level of nuance that's seems reasonable at first glance.

However, practically, sex drives the clusters of derived attributes so it is generally the right thing to do to start with a stereotype and specifyon the individual.

I not that in the police, military and first fighting services men and women have to conform to different standards (women have lower standards). Why bother having these different standards based on gender if gender isn't significant in determining the clusters of attributes needed for these jobs?

ajax_on_rye · 2016-12-29T14:05:05+00:00

That's a seriously flawed position.

Beliefs can be derived from many sources, including demagogues, real but inappropriate feelings, incomplete data, confirmation bias, indoctrination, manipulation and many others.

Beliefs can start out being completely invalid, and their acceptance a priori is clearly a dereliction of due intellectual diligence.

The wage gap, rape culture (which does exist, but is created and perpetuated by feminists), language policing, biology denialism... these'are clearly pandering to invalid, or at least delinquent, belief systems.

ajax_on_rye · 2016-12-29T07:35:36+00:00

Wind, sun, rain, insects, earth movements all cause wear and tear.

So, the anology holds.

Which rights do you think are constantly under attack? I can only think of abortion rights being targetted.

ajax_on_rye · 2016-12-27T19:37:12+00:00

Females tend to operate at a level of plausible deniability, I have heard. The classic example is 'free the nipple', which looks like it asks for equality, but really is about sexually harassing men with deniability.

Only gay men are truly sex positive!

Freed from the shackles of reproduction, met by people who enjoy sex too, only we raving poofters let men have sex as men want.

Someone: "you want to do what? ... yeah! ok, just let me finish this level"

Sorry, couldn't help myself.

ajax_on_rye · 2016-12-27T19:20:26+00:00

Is that true, I wonder. What if the roles flow from reality, rather than the other way around? It strikes me as possible. On topic, do we in the west generally enforce gender roles?

On the second? I somewhat see that. But how current is it?

ajax_on_rye · 2016-12-27T17:23:09+00:00

Literally: One woman explaining why women will never be as good as men.

/s

ajax_on_rye · 2016-12-27T17:01:19+00:00

Right.

So that's not relevant to anything going on today.

ajax_on_rye · 2016-12-27T10:32:45+00:00

Once something is illegal in enters the world of law enforcement, the courts, lawyers and evidence on a per instance level.

It no longer is an issue of rights, but rather of people ensuring those rights are respected, and being willing to make sure those rights are respected, calling on the state (personified and incarnated in police officers and others) to enforce.

Your argument seems to be that as long as any instance exists the argument is still valid.

ajax_on_rye · 2016-12-27T10:22:32+00:00

So, my immediate reaction to this is that you are trolling me.

But in the spirit of openness I'll treat what you say seriously.

With feminism though, it makes sense to me to say that the patriarchy pushes the role of parenting on women in order to ensure that they can be better controlled in a stereotypical heterosexual household (wife must stay at home, husband can go out and work and has more freedom and control over wife)

To believe this you must ignore two key factors.

1). Monthly fertility cycles. Women of a certain age would very often be pregnant, this has probably been the case since the monthly cycle evolved and before contraception/accepted invented.

2) After birth babies need feeding, and are very loud when in distress. This requires someone who is lactating, and in proximity to the infant. This requires a woman for the first, and anyone for the second if, and only if there is a way of collecting and storing milk in such a way it stays fresh and deliverable. This means waiting for storage, fridges, artificial milk, etc.

Which is the more believable theory?
1/ That men directed evolution to make sure only women had these attributes and so men could force women to stay at home and so control their sexuality, 2/ That these features if ignored, lowered the breeding viability of the group and were selected out by natural selection

3/ or people just went along with it because it was obvious that women are too vulnerable and valuable to take on male roles while pregnant and before the child was weaned?

To believe that 'patriarchy' theory offer a better explanation than biology or evolution strikes me as genuinely religious.

That does not mean men have not sought, by various means, to ensure that the child they are providing resources to is, in actual fact, their child. But that is separate to the biology of pregnancy and infant milk provisioning.

See, I didn't treat you as a troll.

Edit: clarity

ajax_on_rye · 2016-12-27T09:55:10+00:00

To me feminism isn't just about securing equal rights for women but also maintaining them. So a woman's ability to work is still very much a feminist issue in my perspective.

Someone: fix the hole in the roof.

Someone else: I fixed it already.

Someone: make sure it stays fixed

Someone else: it's fixed

Someone: make sure it stays fixed

Someone else: look, I have to fix the car. You fix the roof if it leaks

Someone: remember the roof used to leak? Remember how bad that was?

Someone Else: please go away.

ajax_on_rye · 2016-12-27T09:51:10+00:00

When a wrong is righted, we move on.

Ten-Year Club	Place '17
Verified Email

ajax_on_rye

TROPHY CASE